Last Updated 13/07/2026 published 13/07/2026 by Hans Smedema

Sudden Negative Character Change as Fixed Pavlov Mind Control after Severe Torture Explained by the Horrifying Hans Smedema Affair

It is unbelievable but true that even in the 21 century this fenoma is still not fully understood in the current legal battles for justice.

Mostly underage defenseless Daughters!

And it is not understood by the Parents of mostly underage girls who see a sudden change of her character without understanding that their daughter has been drugged and mentally kidnapped by criminals who (ab)use this crucial but widely unknown knowledge. Simply in hours or a few days erasing 15 years of loving parenting!

The crucial mistake people are making: Is that they assume wrongly that by warning and even explaining to the victim what is going on, she will be cured! Impossible! Only weeks of forced care will help a little.

That their daughter has become an ‘Official Istanbul Protocol Torture Survivor’ they will never alone discover with the current understanding of this Pavlov reaction criminally engraved into their daughters brain by unscrupulous criminal gangs. I know this because I saw it happening with my girlfriend without understanding yet, what was happening in combination with her indoctrinated brainwashed denials.

She even was tortured into a beautiful defenseless mind controlled woman with an ‘Extra Emotional Personality’ as a sexslave without telling me her boyfriend, her sisters and parents during many weekends free without the criminal pressure at home! She simply went back on Mondays without warning us or the Police.

I myself am also an ‘Official Istanbul Protocol Torture Survivor’ which I found out only after 25 years of my own investigation into ‘The Hans Smedema Affair’. But that is the result of my own investigation by keeping track of all the strange and criminal events during those 25 years, not by the Parents, Sisters and other Siblings, and not even by Victim Lawyers and Justice employees.

The normal Pavlov simple dog reaction is of course well widely understood, which makes explaining this much more severe event even more difficult. When you try to explain they say: Yes I/we know what a Pavlov reaction is, but that is the simplistic dog Pavlov reaction!

The Mechanics of Induced Submission: A Briefing on the Pavlovian Conditioning and Structural Dissociation Phenomenon

1. Strategic Overview: The Hidden Crisis of Psychological Conditioning

This briefing addresses a critical and dangerous diagnostic deficit within the contemporary judicial system. Judges, lawyers, and legal guardians consistently fail to recognize the mechanics of sophisticated psychological conditioning, often misinterpreting the total absence of physical struggle as voluntary consent. This failure stems from an institutional ignorance of the “Pavlov reaction”—a targeted method of neuro-biological hijacking designed to automate submission. As documented in the forensic record, this conditioning involves the fundamental alteration of neurological fear-response circuitry through clandestine electroshock and drug-facilitated sessions.The foundational groundwork for this phenomenon was established during “Phase I” crimes (1972–2000), a period characterized by state-protected atrocities including forced infertility and mind control. These foundational acts were reportedly overseen by high-level actors, including former Secretary-General of Justice Joris Demmink, and were allegedly shielded by a 1973 Royal Special Decree ensuring absolute impunity for the perpetrators. Understanding these clinical mechanisms is the only viable path toward bridging the current evidentiary gap between engineered biological compliance and the resulting state of “Civil Death” ( burgerlijke dood ).

2. The Anatomy of the “Pavlov Reaction”: Mind Control via Neuro-Biological Hijacking

For the legal professional, a granular understanding of the biological basis of conditioning is the only safeguard against discrediting victims who appear outwardly “submissive.” This state is not a reflection of the victim’s will, but rather the result of a bypass of the prefrontal cortex via amygdala hijacking. In this state, thalamic sensory input is rerouted to automate a submissive motor response before conscious appraisal can occur, rendering the victim a biological passenger to their own automated compliance.The synthesis of this submission is achieved through two primary vectors:

• Clandestine Electroshock Conditioning:  Utilizing high-voltage shocks during secretive sessions in Catral (2008), Benidorm (2010), and Murla (2011), perpetrators induce peritraumatic dissociation and profound amnesia. These sessions were engineered by specialists such as Prof. dr. Onno van der Hart and intelligence operatives like Jaap Duijs (AIVD) to ensure absolute compliance and the destruction of the victim’s defensive neurological circuits.
• Chemical Subjugation:  This involves systemic, long-term pharmacological poisoning. A primary forensic example is the fraudulent repackaging of the potent antipsychotic Risperdal inside boxes labeled “Baby Aspirin 100-mg.” This allows for decades of chemical submission, maintaining the victim in a perpetually dampened neurological state without their conscious knowledge.These specialized sessions create a state of transnational control over the victim’s behavior, governed by the “Ubiquity Principle.”The Ubiquity Principle  This doctrine describes the capacity for transnational control over a victim’s behavior. Because the neurological conditioning is embedded at a biological level, the distress and automated submissive responses are triggered regardless of geographical location. This allows “intellectual authors” to direct harassment remotely through a network of proxies, ensuring the victim remains under control even in exile.This profound neurological alteration manifests as visible, yet frequently misinterpreted, psychological symptoms that require specialized forensic decoding to distinguish from organic mental illness.

3. Identifying the Symptoms: Structural Dissociation and the “Apparently Normal” Victim

A primary strategic obstacle in these cases is the victim’s “normal” appearance, which perpetrators weaponize to argue against the existence of trauma. This reflects  Structural Dissociation , where the personality is fragmented into distinct parts to survive a lethal environment. In the forensic analysis of the “Smedema-Jansma Psychological Dyad,” this fragmentation is stark:

• The Apparently Normal Part (ANP):  This persona handles daily survival by maintaining a “dissociative phobia of the trauma.” The ANP is not “lying”; rather, it is neurologically barred from accessing the trauma. This manifests in reflexive, handwritten denials such as “NOOIT GEBEURD” (“Never Happened”), which the state maliciously presents as evidence of a “delusional” reporter.
• The Emotional Part (EP):  This fragment carries the trauma-induced amnesia and the “double personality” engineered through mind control. The EP is the repository of the actual memories of abuse, currently sequestered by the conditioning.Key Diagnostic Red Flags for Legal Professionals:
• Unexplained Memory Gaps:  Persistent amnesia regarding specific decades or high-stress sessions (e.g., the Benidorm incident).
• Submissive Responses:  An unnatural, automated lack of resistance to perpetrators or specific authority figures.
• Contradictory Statements:  Direct conflicts between a victim’s ANP-driven denials and objective forensic evidence, such as DNA paternity results.
• Physical Indicators of Torture:  Evidence of electroshock trauma identifiable through the application of the  Istanbul Protocol .Institutional failure to recognize these indicators facilitates a “Cordon Sanitaire” that isolates the victim from the protection of the  Rechtsstaat .

4. The Legal “Cordon Sanitaire” and the Failure of Duty to Protect

The strategic danger of “institutional gaslighting” is the facilitation of the victim’s “Civil Death.” This is achieved through the structural merger of the Dutch Ministry of Justice into an ungovernable “Moloch” or “Leviathan,” where the powers of legal protection are subsumed by the “sword power” of the police and intelligence services.This “Cordon Sanitaire” is enforced through specific administrative and legal blockades:

• The Bruinsma Blockade (April 26, 2004):  Detective Haye Bruinsma, acting on ministerial orders, explicitly refused to create the mandatory  proces-verbaal  for the victim’s reports, blocking criminal investigation at the source and creating a circular evidentiary loop.
• Article 13 Advocatenwet:  Professional legal representation is systematically denied through the “Aardoom-Fuchs Blockade.” Dean I. Aardoom-Fuchs and the Dutch Bar Association utilize Article 13 of the Counsel Act to refuse the appointment of counsel, claiming cases are “unsubstantiated”—a condition engineered by the prior police refusal to record evidence.
• Extrajudicial Neutralization:  Perpetrators inform civilian witnesses and restaurant staff that the victim is “mentally sick,” ensuring they are socially isolated and that statements are never provided to aid the victim.
• Administrative Eradication:  The use of “Royal Special Decrees” and “Secret Curatele” (clandestine guardianship) to strip victims of their legal capacity to sign contracts or retain counsel, effectively rendering them legally void.

5. Conclusion: Forensic Recommendations for Judges, Lawyers, and Guardians

Judicial authorities must accept that the  absence of visible struggle is the highest indicator of successful Pavlovian conditioning , not evidence of consent. To break the cycle of state-engineered impunity, the following forensic standards must be adopted:

1. Mandatory Forensic Fact-Checking:  Insist on objective physical evidence over psychiatric labels. Authorities must utilize the  Istanbul Protocol  to evaluate electroshock trauma and DNA testing to expose familial and identity fraud, bypassing the “delusional” label weaponized by the state.
2. Bypassing the Domestic Blockade (The Spanish Anchor):  Because Dutch police operate under the Bruinsma Blockade, legal professionals must utilize Spanish “Denuncias” to trigger a  European Investigation Order (EIO) . Under EU mutual recognition rules, Dutch authorities  cannot  refuse an EIO from a Spanish  Juzgado de Guardia . This forces an interrogation of the “intellectual author” and operational leader ( Arne Smedema , known as “De Nieuwe Leider”) and the seizure of intelligence logs, bypassing domestic obstruction.
3. The Duty to Pursue:  Remind all judicial authorities of  Article 12 of the UNCAT , mandating prompt and impartial investigation of torture, and  Article 408 of the Spanish Penal Code , which criminalizes the omission of the duty to prosecute crimes.The restoration of the  Rechtsstaat  and the protection of underage girls and women from these sophisticated predatory tactics depend entirely on the willingness of the judiciary to look past the “Apparently Normal” surface and address the biological reality of the conditioning beneath.

This all is based on the Expert Experiences of:

ing. Hans Smedema B. Sc., Official Istanbul Protocol Torture Survivor based on the huge available evidence, in forced exile surviving in beautiful El Albir, Costa Blanca, Spain