Demmink Conspiracy Allegations: Smedema’s Account
Joris Demmink, the former Secretary-General of the Dutch Ministry of Justice, is accused by Hans Smedema of being the mastermind behind a complex and multifaceted conspiracy that has spanned decades. Smedema’s allegations portray Demmink as a corrupt and powerful figure who used his position within the Ministry, his connections within the intelligence service, and his alleged influence over the Royal House to silence Smedema, obstruct justice, and protect himself and his alleged accomplices from prosecution. [1-45]
Smedema’s allegations against Demmink can be categorized into several key areas:
1. Early Involvement and Abuse of Power:
Smedema alleges that Demmink’s involvement in the alleged conspiracy began in 1972 when Demmink was a trainee with the Dutch intelligence service (BVD). [24, 30, 46] Smedema accuses Demmink of participating in the rape and torture of his then-girlfriend (who later became his wife) along with Jan van Beek and members of a pornography organization during the filming of a rape movie. [1, 13, 46, 47] Smedema claims that Demmink used his authority as a BVD officer to manipulate and block police investigations into the alleged crimes. [30, 46, 48] He further accuses Demmink of manipulating and falsifying records to ensure that he and his alleged accomplices remained protected from legal consequences. [30, 46]
2. Orchestrating the Cover-Up and Maintaining a Network of Complicity:
Smedema believes that Demmink’s alleged crimes in 1972 triggered the subsequent decades-long cover-up to protect Demmink and his accomplices. [13, 19, 24, 30] Smedema argues that Demmink strategically rose through the ranks of the Dutch Ministry of Justice, ultimately becoming Secretary-General – a position he held from 2002 to 2013 – to further his alleged scheme. [5, 7, 11, 18, 24, 25, 29, 30, 42] Smedema alleges that Demmink used his position to block legal proceedings, manipulate evidence, and establish a network he refers to as the “Omerta,” which aimed to maintain a unified front against Smedema and protect those involved in the alleged crimes. [7, 11, 18, 25, 31, 32]
Smedema claims that Demmink used his authority to obstruct justice in a number of ways. He alleges that Demmink blocked his access to legal representation by intimidating lawyers or pressuring them to withdraw their services. [18, 32, 49, 50] He also claims that Demmink prevented him from filing charges against his alleged abusers by pressuring police to refuse to document his accusations. [18, 32, 41, 49, 51] Smedema further alleges that Demmink was responsible for intimidating and silencing potential witnesses who might corroborate his claims, including a police officer and a chief public prosecutor. [18, 25, 32, 52]
In addition to obstructing legal proceedings, Smedema accuses Demmink of manipulating and destroying evidence to discredit him and maintain a false narrative that he was mentally unstable. [18, 25, 32, 53] He alleges that Demmink deleted or altered crucial documents, including medical records and intelligence files, to erase evidence of wrongdoing. [18, 25, 32, 53] Smedema believes that this alleged tampering was designed to undermine his credibility and prevent any potential legal challenges. [18]
Smedema believes that Demmink’s alleged obstruction of justice was facilitated by the “Omerta,” an alleged network of individuals within the Dutch government, police, and even Smedema’s own family. [18, 32, 54] He alleges that members of the “Omerta” were bribed, intimidated, or coerced into participating in the alleged cover-up. [18, 54]
3. Exploiting “State Security” and Misleading Investigative Bodies:
Smedema claims that Demmink repeatedly invoked “state security” to justify the suppression of evidence and to block investigations into the alleged crimes. [18, 25, 32, 38, 55, 56] By framing the case as a threat to national security, Demmink was allegedly able to justify extreme measures to silence Smedema. [18, 25, 32, 38, 55, 56]
Smedema also alleges that Demmink intentionally misled the Review Committee for the Intelligence and Security Services (CTIVD) during their investigation, providing them with falsified information to prevent them from uncovering the truth. [32] He claims that Demmink used similar tactics to manipulate the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR), providing false and misleading information to discredit Smedema and his claims. [57, 58] Smedema believes that Demmink deliberately omitted crucial information, including details about the “Omerta Organization,” to create the impression that Smedema was delusional and that his claims were baseless. [58]
Smedema claims that Demmink used his position of power to exploit a bilateral judicial treaty between the Netherlands and the US to prevent him from gaining asylum in the United States. [36, 40] He believes that Demmink was able to present a distorted view of his case to international bodies to protect himself and the other alleged conspirators. [58]
4. Demmink’s Alleged Motivations and Impact on Smedema’s Life:
Smedema believes that Demmink’s primary motivation was self-preservation. [25, 33] He argues that Demmink sought to protect himself from the consequences of his alleged crimes and maintain his position of power within the Dutch justice system. [25, 33] Smedema claims that Demmink’s alleged actions had a devastating impact on his life, leading to financial ruin, social isolation, and severe psychological trauma. [25, 33] He argues that Demmink’s alleged machinations directly contributed to his inability to work, his forced exile in Spain, and his failed attempts to seek asylum in the United States. [33]
5. Additional Allegations:
Smedema alleges that the alleged conspiracy extended beyond Demmink’s direct actions. He claims that Demmink was involved in the manipulation and obstruction of numerous other cases within the Dutch justice system. [59] He accuses Demmink of playing a role in protecting high-ranking pedophiles and suggests that Demmink may have been involved in the distribution of child pornography. [8, 60-62]
Key Observations:
- Central Figure: Demmink is consistently identified as the central figure in the alleged conspiracy.
- Abuse of Power: Smedema alleges that Demmink systematically abused his power and influence within the Dutch justice system to protect himself and his alleged accomplices.
- Systemic Obstruction: Smedema’s claims suggest a systematic effort to silence victims, obstruct justice, and manipulate the narrative to protect those in power.
It is important to note that these are allegations made by Hans Smedema and have not been independently verified. Joris Demmink has denied all allegations against him. However, Smedema’s accusations paint a chilling picture of alleged corruption and abuse of power within the Dutch justice system. They highlight the potential dangers of unchecked power and the importance of a robust and transparent system that upholds the rule of law and protects the rights of all citizens, regardless of their status or connections.
Google NotebookLM Insights,
legally based on this blog and ebooks by Victim-Author:
Hans Smedema B. Sc., in forced exile surviving in beautiful El Albir, Costa Blanca, Spain