Last Updated 12/02/2025 published 26/12/2024 by Hans Smedema

Smedema Accusations: Legal and Political Ramifications

Main text

Hans Smedema’s accusations against the Dutch government, if proven true, could have significant legal and political ramifications both domestically and internationally. His claims suggest a systemic abuse of power, corruption, and obstruction of justice that could undermine the legitimacy of the Dutch legal system and damage the reputation of the Dutch government on the world stage.

Legal Ramifications

Criminal Charges and Investigations:

• Smedema accuses specific individuals, including Joris Demmink, Jaap Duijs, and members of his own family, of committing serious crimes, including sexual assault, fraud, and obstruction of justice [1-4]. If his allegations were proven true, these individuals could face criminal charges and potentially lengthy prison sentences. His claims also implicate numerous institutions, including the police, the Ministry of Justice, and the AIVD, suggesting a widespread culture of impunity and a failure to uphold the law [5]. This could lead to calls for independent investigations, potentially resulting in criminal charges against officials and institutional reforms to address systemic corruption.

Civil Lawsuits and Compensation:

• Smedema claims to have suffered substantial financial losses due to the alleged conspiracy, including loss of income, legal expenses, and the depletion of his pension fund [6-8]. He could potentially pursue civil lawsuits against individuals and institutions implicated in his accusations, seeking financial compensation for damages incurred as a result of their alleged actions. His claims of forced medical interventions, including drugging, brainwashing, and electroshock therapy, could also form the basis for legal action against medical professionals and institutions, alleging medical malpractice, assault, and battery [9-11]. Successful civil lawsuits could result in substantial financial settlements and potentially lead to disciplinary actions against medical professionals involved.

Challenges to the “Royal Special Decree”:

• A central element of Smedema’s narrative is the alleged existence of a “Royal Special Decree” issued by Queen Juliana around 1972/73, which he believes granted immunity to those involved in the alleged crimes against him and his wife [12-16]. If such a decree exists, it would raise serious questions about the rule of law in the Netherlands and the monarchy’s potential role in obstructing justice. Legal challenges could be mounted to determine the decree’s legality and whether it can be used to shield individuals from prosecution. Smedema believes this decree has been upheld by subsequent monarchs, preventing any meaningful investigation into his claims and highlighting the need to address the potential abuse of power within the Dutch monarchy [13]. A successful legal challenge to the alleged decree could have far-reaching consequences, potentially opening the door to investigations and prosecutions that were previously blocked and prompting a reevaluation of the monarchy’s power and accountability within the Dutch legal system.

Political Ramifications

Loss of Public Trust and Calls for Reform:

• Smedema’s accusations strike at the heart of the Dutch government and justice system, alleging corruption, cover-ups, and a culture of impunity that protects the powerful at the expense of ordinary citizens [5, 17, 18]. If his claims gained traction and were widely believed, it could lead to a significant loss of public trust in government institutions, sparking public outrage and calls for investigations and reforms to address the alleged systemic issues. Smedema’s blog and self-published books, while lacking independent verification, offer a detailed and emotionally charged narrative that could resonate with segments of the Dutch population skeptical of authority and concerned about government overreach [19]. This could lead to increased scrutiny of the Dutch legal system, particularly its handling of cases involving allegations of abuse and corruption, and potentially fuel support for political movements advocating for greater transparency and accountability within government institutions.

Political Instability and Shifts in Power:

• Smedema’s accusations implicate not only specific individuals but also political parties and potentially the Dutch Royal Family [3, 5, 12, 20]. If evidence emerged to support his claims, it could lead to political scandals, resignations, and potentially even calls for constitutional reforms to limit the power of the monarchy or address perceived weaknesses in the legal system. Smedema’s narrative, by portraying a deeply corrupt system that protects the elite at all costs, could resonate with populist sentiments and fuel support for anti-establishment political parties [21, 22]. This could lead to a shift in the political landscape, with parties advocating for radical change gaining prominence and challenging the traditional power structures. The potential for political instability and shifts in power would depend largely on the public’s reaction to Smedema’s claims and the extent to which his narrative resonated with broader societal concerns about corruption and inequality.

Damage to International Reputation:

• Smedema’s accusations have already attracted international attention, particularly through his asylum requests in the United States and his communication with international bodies like the UN Human Rights Council and the European Court of Human Rights [23-26]. If his claims were proven true, it could significantly damage the Netherlands’ international reputation, casting doubt on its commitment to human rights, the rule of law, and due process. This could lead to diplomatic tensions, economic repercussions, and a loss of influence on the world stage, as other countries might hesitate to cooperate with a government perceived as corrupt and untrustworthy [27]. Smedema claims that the Dutch government has used international agreements, like the bilateral judicial treaty with the US, to shield itself from scrutiny and prevent him from obtaining justice abroad, further highlighting the potential for international ramifications [27-29]. If such allegations were proven, it could lead to calls for revisions to international treaties and agreements to ensure they are not used to facilitate human rights abuses or obstruct justice.

Smedema’s case presents a complex and challenging situation. While his accusations are serious and potentially far-reaching, it is crucial to remember that they are currently unverified. A thorough and impartial investigation is essential to determine the validity of his claims and to address the potential legal and political ramifications that could arise if they are proven true.

Google NotebookLM Insights,

legally based on his posts on this Blog and his eBooks by Victim-Author:

Hans Smedema B. Sc., in forced exile surviving in beautiful El Albir, Costa Blanca, Spain