Last Updated 12/02/2025 published 28/11/2024 by Hans Smedema

Smedema’s Evidence of a Conspiracy

Hans Smedema, through his blog and various online writings, presents a complex narrative alleging a vast, multi-layered conspiracy orchestrated by high-ranking Dutch officials, potentially involving members of the Royal family, to silence him and cover up a series of alleged crimes against him and his wife.

While he presents a detailed and seemingly coherent narrative, the evidence he offers primarily consists of:

• Personal Accounts and Interpretations: The primary sources for Smedema’s claims are his own blog posts and self-published writings. While he provides extensive detail and documentation, these accounts inherently reflect his personal perspective and lack independent verification. [1-19]
• Witness Testimonies: Smedema claims to have gathered testimonies from various individuals, including family members, neighbors, medical professionals, and former government officials. However, he also acknowledges that many of these witnesses are reluctant to speak openly or provide written statements, fearing repercussions from the alleged conspiracy. [20-23] Our conversation history shows that Smedema believes many individuals have confessed their roles in the conspiracy but refuse to offer written confirmation due to fear.
• Review of Personal Records: Smedema claims to have meticulously reviewed his personal records, including medical records, court documents, and correspondence. He highlights inconsistencies and discrepancies that he believes point to manipulation and a deliberate attempt to discredit him. However, accessing these records has proven challenging, and Smedema alleges that crucial documents have been deleted or altered by the authorities to maintain the cover-up. [20, 24, 25]
• The “Frankfurt Dossier”: Smedema repeatedly mentions a “Frankfurt dossier” that he claims contained evidence of the conspiracy, including information about his wife’s alleged abuse and the involvement of high-ranking officials. He alleges that this dossier, discovered in 1983 at the 97th General Army Hospital in Frankfurt, was erased by the Dutch intelligence service shortly after its discovery. Smedema believes a copy of this dossier may still exist in the United States but acknowledges that he has not been able to obtain it. [26, 27]
• American Investigation: Smedema asserts that the FBI and CIA investigated his claims during his asylum requests to the United States and found evidence supporting many of his allegations. He specifically claims that the investigation confirmed the non-paternity of his children, corroborating his claims of forced sterilization and the involvement of his wife in a network of sexual abuse. However, he states that the US government has refused to publicly release the findings of this investigation, citing a bilateral judicial treaty with the Netherlands that protects the Dutch Crown. [28-31]

Obstacles to Presenting Evidence

Smedema attributes his inability to present more concrete evidence to the very nature of the alleged conspiracy:

• Lack of Cooperation from Dutch Authorities: Smedema consistently claims that the Dutch government, including the police, the Ministry of Justice, and the intelligence service (AIVD), have actively obstructed his attempts to uncover the truth. He alleges that they have ignored his reports, denied him access to information, pressured witnesses to remain silent, and even manipulated legal proceedings against him. [1, 25, 32-34]
• Difficulty Securing Legal Representation: Smedema claims that lawyers have consistently refused to represent him or have withdrawn from his case after learning more about his claims. He believes that this is due to pressure from the Dutch government and the “Cordon Sanitaire” that has been erected to isolate him. [1, 32, 33, 35] Our conversation history confirms that Smedema believes that no lawyer would take his case because of the cover-up and pressure from the alleged conspirators.
• “State Security” as a Justification: Smedema argues that the Dutch government repeatedly uses “State Security” as a justification for denying him access to information and blocking investigations into his allegations. [2, 36] Our conversation history indicates Smedema feels this tactic shields the alleged conspiracy from scrutiny and accountability.

Credibility Challenges

While Smedema presents his narrative with conviction and offers detailed accounts, the sources provided do not include any independent corroboration of his claims. The evidence he presents, particularly his personal interpretations of events and witness testimonies that lack documentation, makes it difficult to assess the objective validity of his accusations. The lack of access to official records further complicates attempts to verify his claims.

Key Concepts

• Cordon Sanitaire: This term is central to Smedema’s narrative. He claims that the alleged conspiracy has created a “Cordon Sanitaire” around him, deliberately isolating him from support and manipulating individuals in his life to reinforce the perception that he is delusional. [9, 29, 37-40] This “Cordon Sanitaire” extends beyond his personal life, encompassing legal professionals, victim support organizations, and media outlets, preventing him from gaining any traction in his fight for justice. Our conversation history showed that Smedema believes that all Dutch victim support organizations were secretly instructed to deny him help.
• Joris Demmink: Smedema consistently identifies Joris Demmink, the former Secretary-General of the Ministry of Justice, as the mastermind behind the alleged conspiracy. He accuses Demmink of participating in the initial crimes against his wife and subsequently orchestrating a vast cover-up to protect himself and other high-ranking officials. [4, 15, 37, 41]
• “Royal Special Decree”: Smedema repeatedly claims that Queen Juliana issued a secret decree around 1972/73 that granted immunity to those involved in the crimes against him and his wife. He believes this decree was based on false information and was used to shield Demmink and the alleged conspiracy from investigation. [42-45]
• Forced Sterilization and Medical Manipulation: Smedema claims he was forcibly sterilized in 1972 and subjected to years of psychological torture, drugging, and “brainwashing” by medical professionals allegedly complicit in the conspiracy. He accuses specific individuals, including Professor Dr. Onno van der Hart, of participating in these acts to discredit his claims and portray him as mentally unstable. [20, 46-48]
• American Confirmation and Betrayal: Smedema highlights the alleged findings of the American investigation as validation of his claims. He believes the FBI and CIA confirmed the non-paternity of his children and acknowledged the validity of his persecution. However, he also expresses a sense of betrayal by the US government, claiming that they ultimately chose to uphold the bilateral judicial treaty with the Netherlands and refused to publicly release the information they gathered, further enabling the alleged cover-up. [28-30, 49, 50]

Understanding Smedema’s Narrative

Understanding Smedema’s evidence requires considering the overarching narrative he presents. He frames his experiences as a battle against a powerful and corrupt system determined to silence him at any cost. His claims, whether verified or not, raise important questions about the potential for abuse of power within governments and institutions, and the challenges individuals face when confronting these entities. His repeated comparisons of his situation to the “Dreyfus Affair” and other historical instances of government cover-ups underscore his belief in a deeply entrenched and systematic effort to suppress the truth. [51, 52]

Concluding Note

While Smedema provides a compelling narrative and presents his interpretation of events as evidence, the lack of independent verification makes it difficult to definitively assess the validity of his claims. His case, however, underscores the importance of critical thinking, source evaluation, and considering multiple perspectives when encountering complex narratives involving allegations of conspiracy and abuse of power.

Smedema Family’s Alleged Role in the Conspiracy: A Web of Betrayal and Complicity

The sources, primarily Smedema’s blog posts, depict his family, particularly his brother Johan Smedema, as central figures in the alleged conspiracy against him. Smedema contends that his family’s involvement stems from a desire to protect themselves and maintain a facade of normalcy, leading them to participate in a complex web of deceit, manipulation, and obstruction of justice.

Here’s a breakdown of their alleged roles:

• Johan Smedema: The Architect and “Godfather”: Smedema characterizes Johan as the mastermind behind the family’s involvement, labeling him the “Godfather” of the “family mafia” [1]. He alleges Johan collaborated with Joris Demmink, the “rapist-traitor” at the heart of the conspiracy, to establish the “Omerta Organization,” a clandestine network dedicated to silencing Smedema and protecting those involved in the alleged crimes against his wife [1, 2]. Johan allegedly used his position as a lawyer to provide legal cover for the Omerta’s operations and to manipulate legal proceedings to Smedema’s detriment [1]. Smedema claims Johan even employed a justice official part-time in his real estate office to lend legitimacy to their illegal activities [1].
• Tjitte de Jong: Taking the Reins: Smedema alleges that Tjitte, his brother-in-law, took over leadership of the family’s involvement in the conspiracy after Johan [1]. He accuses Tjitte of obtaining a video from Smedema under false pretenses, which was then used against him [1]. Smedema claims Tjitte, a devout churchgoer, acted with “meedogenloos en gewetenloos” (ruthless and unconscionable) disregard for Smedema and his wife’s suffering, allowing the alleged abuse to continue unchecked [1]. Smedema further accuses Tjitte of misleading private investigators hired to investigate the case, perpetuating the narrative that Smedema was mentally unstable [1].
• Rinske (Rinneke) Smedema: While less prominent in the sources, Smedema also implicates his sister Rinske in the conspiracy. He claims she, along with Tjitte, attended church regularly while simultaneously participating in the cover-up and ignoring the alleged suffering inflicted upon Smedema and his wife [1].
• Klazien and Betty: Our previous conversation highlighted the roles of Klazien, Smedema’s sister-in-law, and Betty, a friend of the family, in destroying key evidence, including photos of Wies’s alleged abuse. Their actions suggest a willingness to actively participate in the cover-up to protect the alleged perpetrators and maintain the Omerta’s secrecy.
• Financial Motives: Smedema alleges that financial incentives played a role in his family’s complicity. He claims that they benefited from his silence, as exposure of the truth would have threatened their social standing and financial stability [1, 3]. Smedema also mentions that his siblings faced financial repercussions due to legal actions taken against them as part of his attempts to expose the conspiracy, leading to questions about their motives and resentment towards him [3].

A Culture of Silence and Fear: The sources suggest that a culture of silence and fear permeated the family’s involvement in the alleged conspiracy. Smedema claims that family members refused to offer him any assistance or acknowledge his claims, adhering to the Omerta’s code of silence [1]. This silence, fueled by fear of repercussions from the powerful individuals allegedly involved, allowed the alleged abuse and manipulation to continue unchecked.

Psychological Manipulation and Wies’s “Double Personality”: Smedema’s claims extend beyond mere complicity; he accuses his family of actively participating in the psychological manipulation of his wife, Wies. He alleges that they reinforced the narrative that he was mentally unstable, contributing to his isolation and undermining his credibility [4]. Smedema’s descriptions of Wies’s “double personality” suggest that she might have been subjected to brainwashing and conditioning, potentially rendering her vulnerable to manipulation by those around her, including her own family [4, 5].

It’s crucial to acknowledge that Smedema’s accusations against his family, while detailed and presented with conviction, are based on his personal interpretations and lack independent verification. The sources do not present evidence beyond Smedema’s own assertions. However, his claims, if true, paint a disturbing picture of a family entangled in a web of deceit, manipulation, and complicity, prioritizing self-preservation and silence over truth and justice.

Google NotebookLM Insights

Amazingly correct, but not yet 100%. But it gives much much more power to try to solve this cover-up.

Based on this Blog and Ebooks by Author:

Dutch Hans Smedema B. Sc., in forced exile surviving in beautiful ‘El Albir’, Costa Blanca, Spain