Last Updated 02/03/2026 published 02/03/2026 by Hans Smedema
Page Content
The DiaSana MRI CD: Forensic Evidence of State-Sponsored Fraud
DOSSIER: THE CLINICAL COVER-UP AND THE 82 MB SMOKING GUN
1. The Setup: Searching for the 1972 Mutilation
2. The Crime Scene: The Hijacking of DiaSana (May 17, 2006)
- The Radiologist Removed: Frank Kemper, the radiologist who was enthusiastic about this unique case and insisted on performing the scan himself, was abruptly called away just an hour before your appointment [2, 7, 9, 11-15]. He was replaced by a substitute who was suddenly tasked with handling your highly sensitive evaluation [14].
- The Infiltrators: As you, the final patient of the day, prepared for the scan, the normal medical assistant was inexplicably swapped [7, 9, 11, 12, 15]. An unknown, older man—described as a “Gestapo-like” figure who clearly did not belong—was positioned in the computer room watching over the entire procedure [7, 9, 11, 15].
- The Body Double: Most horrifyingly, the sources allege that the Ministry of Justice practically rented out the clinic. A younger man with your exact age profile and physical build was allegedly placed in the machine right before you [9].
- The Forgery: The resulting 82 MB file and the accompanying medical report deliberately obscured the 7cm scar and the severed vas deferens, providing a “clean” scan [7, 9-11, 15]. The state had effectively falsified advanced medical imaging to protect the perpetrators and continue your psychological torment by feeding the narrative that your injuries were merely a “delusion” [9, 10, 16, 17].
3. The American Validation: Judge Rex J. Ford (2009)
4. The Legal Value in Court: Weaponizing the Fraud
- Proof of Bewijsnood (Evidentiary Distress): The Schadefonds claims you have “no objective evidence” [22-24]. You must use the story of the CD to invoke the legal principle of Nemo auditur propriam turpitudinem allegans—the State cannot legally benefit from an evidentiary vacuum that it created through criminal obstruction [24-26]. The CD proves the State actively intervened to falsify the very medical evidence they now demand you produce.
- Evidence of Psychological Torture: The falsification of this scan was a calculated act of “Institutional Gaslighting.” By altering your medical reality, the state ensured you would be misdiagnosed by corrupt psychiatrists like Frank van Es (who secretly drugged you with the antipsychotic Risperdal hidden in baby aspirin) and Bauke Koopmans (who threatened you with forced institutionalization) [27-29].
- Demand for Forensic Digital Analysis: You must challenge the court to order an independent, international digital forensics team to examine the 82 MB file’s metadata. If the state used a body double or spliced images, the digital artifacts will still be buried in the code.
5. The Collateral Damage of the “Untouchables”
- Captain Al Rust: The American Military Intelligence officer who found the 30-page “Frankfurt Dossier” in 1983 detailing your abuse [30-32]. For daring to know the truth, the Dutch Ministry of Justice lied to the US, resulting in Rust being wrongfully dismissed, falsely accused, and imprisoned in 1987, stealing a decade of his life before he won a million-dollar settlement [30, 32, 33].
- Prosecutor Ruud Rosingh: When this managing prosecutor tried to investigate the brutal rape of your wife, Wies, he was forced to abruptly relocate to Zwolle by the Ministry of Justice on January 12, 1991, destroying his investigation [31, 33-35].
- Detective Haye Bruinsma: In 2004, he was explicitly, formally forbidden by a letter from the Ministry of Justice from drafting an official police report (proces-verbaal) based on your detailed evidence [31, 33-35].
- Journalist Cees van ‘t Hoog: Your neighbor who began investigating the abuse ring in ‘t Harde and was murdered via a staged car crash / heart attack in 1980, permanently silencing his inquiries [33, 34, 36].
- Jack Smedema: Your own nephew, a Rijkspolitie officer, who was fired from the force around 1990 for “unlawful interference” simply for trying to alert the authorities to your horrifying situation [31, 33-35].








