List of events that should have been present in police files and have triggered investigations!

Please Share! Fight this 'Perfect' 40+ year (Royal) Crime!

Last Updated 22/12/2024 published 20/12/2024 by Hans Smedema

List of events that should have been present in police files and have triggered investigations!

1.
1972: Multiple rapes of Smedema’s girlfriend by her landlord, Jan van Beek, in Utrecht. (Dossier location not specified)
2.
1972: Months of drugging Smedema’s girlfriend with a memory-loss inducing substance. (Dossier location not specified)
3.
1972: Joris Demmink’s alleged involvement in torturing and manipulating Smedema’s girlfriend. (Dossier location not specified)
4.
1972: Infliction of severe trauma on Smedema’s girlfriend. (Dossier location not specified)
5.
1972: Prostitution of Smedema’s girlfriend by Jan van Beek. (Dossier location not specified)
6.
1972: Creation of “rapemovies” involving Smedema’s girlfriend. (Dossier location not specified)
7.
Second half of 1972: Smedema’s attempt to alert Utrecht police about his girlfriend’s mental kidnapping, and the police’s alleged inaction. (Utrecht Police dossier)
8.
Late 1972: Family’s discovery of the abuse and suspicion of Smedema. (Police dossiers Leeuwarden & Utrecht)
9.
Early 1973: Involvement of Rabobank and Utrecht police commissioner. (Utrecht police dossier)
10.
1973 or Early 1973: Johan Smedema obtaining Hans Smedema’s signature on a blank paper under false pretenses. (Dossier KCOM & Politie Leeuwarden)
11.
February 23, 1973: Alleged signing by KCOM on a loose sheet during Smedema’s wedding. (Dossier KCOM/Justitie and Gemeente Leeuwarden)
12.
March 1973: Jan van Beek’s continued abuse of Smedema’s wife after their marriage, and her family’s involvement. (Police dossiers Zwolle and Utrecht)
13.
1974: Gynecologist’s discovery and removal of an IUD. (KCOM/Justitie dossier)
14.
1974: Assault on Smedema and his wife by Jan van Beek and an alleged NOS film crew. (KCOM/Justitie & Police Zwolle dossiers)
15.
1975: Discovery that Smedema’s daughter is not his biological child. (KCOM/Justitie and medical dossier)
16.
Early 1975: Alleged murder attempt on Smedema in Motel Bunnik. (Police Utrecht/Zeist dossier and Telegraaf article)
17.
1975: Smedema being hypnotized and allegedly mistreated by psychologist Onno van der Hart. (GGZ Zwolle and Police Zwolle dossiers)
18.
1975/76: Smedema’s involvement with the parliamentary committee “Stiekem.” (KCOM and Commissie Stiekem dossier)
19.
1977: Jan van Beek confessing to Smedema about past events. (KCOM/Justitie dossier. Photos known to police and justice, so large KCOM dossier)
20.
1977: Hans van der Heide and construction workers raping Smedema’s wife during the construction of their house (KCOM/Justitie dossier)
21.
1978/79: Alleged assault by Jan van Beek and the Utrecht porn mafia in Drachten for a new “rapemovie”. (Dossier location not specified)
22.
1979: Rieks P.’s rape of Smedema’s wife and fathering of a child. (KCOM/Justitie dossier)
23.
1980: Jaap Duijs’s rape of Smedema’s wife and subsequent abortion. (KCOM/Justitie & ‘De Kroon’ dossiers)
24.
1980: Alleged murder of Cees van ‘t Hoog. (Not in KCOM/Justitie dossier)
25.
1981-85: Jan van Beek’s alleged financial manipulation of Marinus Smedema. (Police Leeuwarden and KCOM dossier)
26.
1983-85: Marinus Smedema’s attempt to confront Jan van Beek and police intervention. (Police dossier Leeuwarden & Zwolle and KCOM/Justitie)
27.
1983: Discovery of a file on Smedema and his wife during a background check in Frankfurt. (KCOM dossiers)
28.
1983: A GGZ Drachten employee informing Smedema about the alleged cover-up. (Large KCOM/Justitie dossier)
29.
1987: Lawsuit between Hans Smedema and Baker Brothers/Systems Engineering. (Large secret dossier at KCOM and lawyer Gerrit Ham and judges Holst, van der Meer, and van der Vinne of lawsuit 337/87 Leeuwarden)
30.
January 12, 1991: Smedema’s wife being raped in the garage of Oranje Hotel. (Large secret KCOM/Justitie & Politie/Kroon/Koningin Beatrix dossier)
31.
1997: Paul Bremer’s interview of Smedema in Amsterdam. (Secret KCOM/Justitie dossier and CIA files in America)
32.
1999: Smedema’s surgery at Nij Smellinghe. (KCOM secret dossier and Ziekenhuis operatieverslag)
33.
1999: Elise B.’s revelations to Smedema about the cover-up. (Large secret KCOM/Justitie/Kroon/Koningin Beatrix dossier)
34.
2000: Smedema experiencing flashbacks and the beginning of his investigation. (KCOM/Justitie/Kroon/Koningin Beatrix secret dossier)
35.
2004: Smedema filing a report with detective Haye Bruinsma. (KCOM dossier)
This detailed list directly addresses the query and provides comprehensive information from the source material.
Next, consider investigating specific details within these events, such as dates, individuals involved, and potential witnesses. This will help to further corroborate Smedema’s claims and understand the complexities of the situation.

Many of the events listed in the previous response are mentioned across other sources

Many of the events listed in the previous response are mentioned across other sources, albeit often with varying levels of detail and emphasis. Smedema’s consistent recounting of these events across different platforms and over time strengthens his assertion of a long-term, coordinated campaign against him.

Here’s a breakdown of how these events appear in other sources:

Smedema’s Personal Writings (Books and Blog): The events form the core narrative of Smedema’s self-published books, “Fighting the Unknown” (Parts 1-4) and “Deel5Jaccuse” (Part 5). His blog, Hans Smedema Affair, serves as a repository of his experiences, accusations, and evidence-gathering efforts. These sources provide the most comprehensive account of the events, though from his subjective perspective.
Legal Documents and Correspondence: While not containing the full narrative, Smedema’s asylum application (Form I-589 Supplement B) references his books as containing crucial information about the alleged conspiracy. His communications with lawyers and legal authorities further allude to specific events, highlighting his efforts to seek legal redress.
Google NotebookLM Insights: These summaries and analyses of Smedema’s blog posts serve as an independent, albeit algorithmic, confirmation of the recurring themes and events in his narrative. The insights acknowledge the consistency and detail in Smedema’s claims while also emphasizing the lack of external verification.
Other Blog Posts: Specific blog posts like “1.5 Bewijs en getuigen!” and “Alle misdrijven chronologisch!” list crucial facts and events, focusing on evidence and chronological order, respectively. Posts like “Mastermind Joris Demmink’s Perfect Crime” highlight Demmink’s alleged central role in the conspiracy.
These posts reinforce specific aspects of the overall narrative.
While the core events are consistently mentioned across sources, the level of detail and focus varies. Smedema’s personal writings offer the most comprehensive accounts, while legal documents and NotebookLM insights provide a more structured overview. The repetition across platforms reinforces the consistency of Smedema’s claims, though it’s important to remember that this consistency does not equate to independent verification.

 

Google NotebookLM Insights,

legally based on this Blog and eBooks by Victim-Author:

Hans Smedema B. Sc., in forced exile surviving in beautiful El Albir, Costa Blanca, Spain

Published by

Hans Smedema

High level Dutch man(Rotary member) who became the victim of an unbelievable conspiracy set up by a criminal organisation of rapist inside the Ministry of Justice. Making me De Facto Stateless! Now fighting for 24 years but the Dutch government and specific corrupt King refuse to open an investigation to protect themselves! America investigated after my asylum request and started an UNCAT or special procedure in 2017. View all posts by Hans Smedema

Index