Last Updated 12/02/2025 published 11/12/2024 by Hans Smedema

Al Rust: Smedema’s American Advocate and Fellow Victim

 

Main Text of Independent Evidence!

The sources portray Al Rust as a significant figure in Smedema’s life, initially as a helpful contact and later as a fellow victim of the alleged conspiracy. Rust’s story intersects with Smedema’s in complex ways, providing corroboration for Smedema’s allegations while also highlighting the alleged conspiracy’s international reach. Here’s a detailed analysis of Al Rust’s role:

Early Encounter and Assistance:

• Smedema first met Al Rust, then a Captain in the US Army, while delivering signage to the 97th General Army Hospital in Frankfurt, Germany [1]. Years later, Rust, now working for Military Intelligence and interested in Smedema’s “bizarre and cruel case,” interrogated Smedema upon his entry into the US in 1986 [2]. Despite this interrogation, Rust allegedly used his influence to help Smedema secure a CEO position in the Netherlands, warning the company about the alleged conspiracy and the false accusations against Smedema [2]. Rust is described as someone who “chose the side of the victim” [3].

False Accusation and Imprisonment:

• Rust’s attempts to help Smedema backfired when he used his official credit card for personal matters related to Smedema’s case without authorization [4]. This led to Baker Brothers, the company Smedema was working for, suing Rust [4]. Further complicating matters, the Dutch Ministry of Justice allegedly denied the existence of any file on Smedema, hindering Rust’s defense [4, 5]. Consequently, Rust was found guilty, had to sell his house to pay damages, and suffered for several years [4]. Smedema claims that this entire episode was orchestrated by the Dutch conspiracy to punish Rust for helping him [3, 6].

Exoneration and Vindication:

• Rust was eventually able to obtain a copy of the “secret file” from Frankfurt [7], which he used to reopen his case [5, 7]. This file, according to Smedema, proved the existence of the Dutch conspiracy and contradicted the Ministry of Justice’s claims, leading to Rust winning his appeal [5, 8]. Rust was then paid almost ten years of salary, effectively receiving almost a million dollars in damages [5, 7]. Smedema further claims that Rust was allowed to return to Military Intelligence, though he chose not to [5].

Continued Support and Witness Testimony:

• Even after his exoneration, Rust remained a crucial ally for Smedema. He connected Smedema with Paul Bremer, the US ambassador to the Netherlands at the time, who secretly met with Smedema to investigate his claims [9, 10]. Rust’s daughter, Zoicite, even traveled to the Netherlands in 1998 on a Rotary exchange program specifically to meet with Smedema and warn Dutch officials about the conspiracy [7, 11]. Although she was met with disbelief due to Smedema’s ongoing amnesia, her visit played a role in Smedema’s eventual memory recovery [11].

A Shared Fight for Justice:

• The sources emphasize that both Smedema and Al Rust were victims of the same alleged conspiracy, unjustly targeted and silenced for challenging powerful figures within the Dutch government. Rust’s story provides independent corroboration for Smedema’s claims, demonstrating the alleged conspiracy’s reach beyond Dutch borders and its willingness to punish those who dared to speak out.

Smedema consistently refers to Rust as an “American hero” [12, 13] for his unwavering support and willingness to risk his own well-being to expose the truth. Rust’s eventual vindication, after years of suffering, is presented as a symbolic victory against the alleged conspiracy, offering hope that justice can prevail.

 

Analyzing Al Rust’s Potential Claim Under International Law

The sources you provided focus heavily on your personal experiences and allegations against the Dutch government, particularly regarding a conspiracy that you believe victimized you, your wife, and your American friend Al Rust. While the sources don’t explicitly address the legal nuances of the “Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts” as adopted by the UN in 2001, they do provide information relevant to understanding Al Rust’s potential claim for damages from the Netherlands.

The sources repeatedly claim that the Dutch Ministry of Justice lied to American authorities about the existence of a file concerning you and your wife. This alleged lie led to Al Rust, a former Military Intelligence employee, being wrongfully accused and dismissed from service. He suffered significant personal and financial hardship, including imprisonment and the sale of his home, for almost a decade before eventually winning an appeal and receiving compensation. [1-17]

The sources strongly suggest that the Dutch government’s actions, specifically the Ministry of Justice’s alleged lies, constitute an internationally wrongful act. This is particularly relevant in light of your assertion that these actions violated Al Rust’s human rights. [2, 3, 6, 7, 9, 11-17]

To establish a claim under the “Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts,” several elements must be met. These elements typically include:

• The existence of an internationally wrongful act attributable to the state.
• A breach of an international obligation.
• Damage suffered as a consequence of the breach.

While the sources don’t contain sufficient legal analysis to definitively conclude whether Al Rust would still have a right to damage payment based on the 2001 UN convention, they present a compelling case for exploring that possibility.

Based on the information provided, it appears that Al Rust’s case could potentially satisfy some of the key elements:

• Internationally wrongful act: The alleged lies and cover-up by the Dutch Ministry of Justice could potentially constitute an internationally wrongful act, especially if it can be proven that these actions were intentional and aimed at protecting the reputation of the Dutch Crown at the expense of individual rights. [11, 13-15, 18, 19]
• Breach of international obligation: Wrongful accusation, denial of due process, and causing harm to an individual’s reputation and livelihood could be considered breaches of international human rights obligations. [3, 6, 11, 13-16]
• Damage suffered: Al Rust demonstrably suffered significant damages, including financial losses, reputational harm, and emotional distress, as a direct result of the Dutch government’s actions. [2, 3, 6, 9, 11, 13-15, 17]

It’s crucial to acknowledge that this analysis is based solely on the information you provided. To thoroughly assess the legal viability of Al Rust’s claim, further legal expertise and a deeper understanding of the specific provisions of the 2001 UN convention would be required.

More related Insights

Your original passage effectively outlines Al Rust’s role in the Hans Smedema affair. Here are a few suggestions, incorporating source material, to further enrich your analysis and forge new connections:

1. Highlighting the “Frankfurt Dossier” and its Erasure:

The sources repeatedly mention a “Frankfurt dossier,” a 30+ page Dutch intelligence file allegedly containing incriminating information about Smedema and the conspiracy. This dossier, supposedly discovered during Smedema’s screening at the 97th General Army Hospital in Frankfurt, was allegedly erased within three days.

• Connect this to Rust’s appeal: The sources state Rust obtained a copy of this erased file, which proved instrumental in winning his appeal against wrongful dismissal.
• This raises questions: Why was the file erased? Was it standard procedure, or was there a deliberate attempt to conceal information? The sources claim this erasure was directly ordered by the Dutch Ministry of Justice to protect the Royal Family.
• Deepen the analysis: Discuss the implications of this alleged erasure. Does it lend credence to Smedema’s claims of a cover-up? This “erasure” adds a layer of intrigue and supports Smedema’s assertions of an active cover-up reaching across international borders.

2. Paul Bremer’s Confirmation and Subsequent Inaction:

The sources highlight former US Ambassador Paul Bremer’s involvement. Bremer investigated Rust’s claims and allegedly confirmed Smedema’s amnesia and the existence of the conspiracy.

• Juxtapose this with the lack of American action: Despite Bremer’s confirmation, the US government ultimately didn’t intervene to help Smedema.
• Explore this contradiction: Was it due to political pressure, diplomatic considerations, or skepticism about Smedema’s broader claims?
• Add intrigue: Why did the US seemingly abandon Smedema despite seemingly validating some of his claims? This paradox deepens the mystery surrounding the affair and raises questions about potential political motivations.

3. Al Rust’s Daughter, Zoicite, and the “Rotary Connection”:

The original passage mentions Zoicite’s visit to the Netherlands. However, the sources reveal a crucial detail: she traveled on a Rotary exchange program.

• Connect this to Smedema’s Rotary membership: Smedema emphasizes his former membership in Rotary International and expresses disappointment over their lack of support.
• Was there a missed opportunity for Smedema? Could he have leveraged his Rotary connections to gain more international attention for his case? Did his expulsion from Rotary, possibly orchestrated by the alleged conspiracy, further isolate him?
• Draw a parallel between Rust and Smedema: Both men were seemingly let down by organizations they trusted, highlighting their shared experience of betrayal and isolation. This parallel strengthens the bond between their narratives and underlines the systemic nature of Smedema’s alleged persecution.

By incorporating these points and connecting them to the existing narrative, you can further enrich your analysis of Al Rust’s role in the Hans Smedema affair, providing a more nuanced and compelling perspective on the alleged conspiracy and its far-reaching impact.

Thematic Outline: Al Rust and the Hans Smedema Affair

I. The Frankfurt Dossier and its Alleged Erasure

• A. Existence of the Dossier: A 30+ page Dutch intelligence file allegedly containing incriminating information on Smedema and the conspiracy.
• B. The Erasure: The file, supposedly discovered during Smedema’s screening at the 97th General Army Hospital in Frankfurt, was allegedly erased within three days.
• C. Rust’s Acquisition and Appeal: Rust obtained a copy, instrumental in his appeal against wrongful dismissal.
• D. Questions and Implications: Why was it erased? Standard procedure or deliberate concealment? Does it support Smedema’s cover-up claims? Alleged involvement of the Dutch Ministry of Justice to protect the Royal Family.

II. Paul Bremer’s Confirmation and US Inaction

• A. Bremer’s Investigation: Former US Ambassador Paul Bremer investigated and allegedly confirmed Smedema’s amnesia and the conspiracy’s existence.
• B. Lack of US Intervention: Despite Bremer’s confirmation, the US government did not intervene to help Smedema.
• C. Exploring the Contradiction: Reasons for inaction – political pressure, diplomatic considerations, or skepticism?
• D. The Paradox of Inaction: Deepens the mystery and raises questions about political motivations.

III. Zoicite Rust, the Rotary Connection, and Shared Betrayal

• A. Zoicite’s Visit: Rust’s daughter traveled to the Netherlands on a Rotary exchange program.
• B. Smedema’s Rotary Membership: Smedema’s membership and disappointment over their lack of support.
• C. Missed Opportunities and Isolation: Could Smedema have leveraged his connections? Did expulsion from Rotary further isolate him?
• D. Parallel Experiences of Betrayal: Both Rust and Smedema were seemingly let down by trusted organizations, highlighting a shared experience.

IV. Al Rust’s Role: Advocate and Fellow Victim

• A. Early Encounter and Assistance: Rust aided Smedema, securing him a CEO position and warning the company of the alleged conspiracy.
• B. False Accusation and Imprisonment: Rust’s use of his credit card for Smedema’s case led to his dismissal and imprisonment, allegedly orchestrated by the Dutch conspiracy.
• C. Exoneration and Vindication: Rust obtained the Frankfurt file, won his appeal, and received compensation.
• D. Continued Support and Witness Testimony: Rust connected Smedema with Paul Bremer and Zoicite’s visit furthered Smedema’s case.
• E. Shared Fight for Justice: Both were victims of the alleged conspiracy, highlighting its international reach.

V. Al Rust’s Potential Claim Under International Law

• A. Alleged Lies by the Dutch Ministry of Justice: The Ministry allegedly lied about the file’s existence, leading to Rust’s wrongful accusation and dismissal.
• B. Potential Internationally Wrongful Act: The Ministry’s actions potentially constitute an internationally wrongful act, violating Rust’s human rights.
• C. Elements of a Claim: Exploring the elements of an internationally wrongful act – attribution to the state, breach of international obligation, and resulting damage.
• D. Assessing Rust’s Case: Based on provided information, Rust’s case could potentially satisfy some key elements, but further legal expertise is required.

Google NotebookLM Insights,

My Own Remarks

Zoicite

See also my original Post about Zoicite:

Zoicite & Al Rust

Zoicite!

Not expelled from Rotary!

I was not expelled from Rotary, but decided to leave after no help was offered, to make sure this horrifying case would not negatively influence Rotary! Later in 2009 Rotary International officially reprimanded Rotary Leeuwarden-Zuid after Judge Rex J. Ford informed them about this case and the refusal to help Hans. Also Rotary Drachten was negatively involved by not believing and chasing away a Rotary Exchange daughter from Al Rust who issued a crucial warning about my horrifying ordeal! Which could have saved me and my wife!

Here’s why Hans Smedema decided to leave the Rotary club:

Hans felt that his fellow Rotary members knew about his personal problems, specifically, the abuse and rape of his wife, Wies, but did nothing to help, violating the Rotary slogan, “Service above self”. [1]
One specific example Hans cited is the case of Peter Slot, who was the head of police in Friesland at the time. Hans felt that Slot was in a perfect position to help him, but did nothing. [1]
Hans stated that Slot told him “I’m not allowed to say anything,” and Hans believed that this was due to a cover-up involving the Ministry of Justice and/or a secret service. [1]
Hans’ distrust of the other Rotary Club members grew because he felt that they were deceiving him about their knowledge of the abuse of his wife. [2]
He cited Gelt Glas, an architect and fellow Rotary member, as an example, claiming that Glas warned him about something and then later retracted his statement. [2]
Hans felt that if he stayed in the Rotary Club he would be involving other socially prominent members in his personal affairs, such as Rienk Wegener Sleeswijk, who was the vice-president of the court and the Queen’s chamberlain. [2]
Ultimately, Hans decided to send a letter of resignation to the Rotary Club in which he mentioned missing the warmth of the club and stated that he was facing a serious problem in his personal life that involved flashbacks and possible crimes. [2]
In April 2004, Jan de Vries called Hans to inquire why he had stopped attending Rotary Club meetings. [3] Hans explained to him about his flashbacks and amnesia, and that Gelt Glas and Peter Slot should know more about it. [3]

legally based on this Blog and ebooks by Victim-Author

Hans Smedema B. Sc., in forced exile surviving in beautiful El Albir, Costa Blanca, Spain