Smedema’s Catral Account: The Role of a Former Dutch Police Officer

Main text

Ad, a former Dutch police officer, plays a crucial role in Hans Smedema’s account of the alleged electroshock torture in Catral, Spain. His presence as a witness, his reaction to the alleged events, and his reported assessment of the situation provide significant support for Smedema’s claims.

Ad’s Presence at the Catral Villa:

Smedema’s account consistently places the alleged electroshock torture at Ad’s villa in Catral. The fact that the alleged incident occurred at the home of a former Dutch police officer adds a layer of credibility to Smedema’s narrative. It suggests a potential connection to Dutch law enforcement and raises questions about the extent of the alleged conspiracy’s reach. The sources do not elaborate on the nature of Smedema’s relationship with Ad or why he was present at the villa during the alleged incident. However, the fact that Ad was present and witnessed the alleged torture firsthand makes his testimony critical to understanding the events.

Ad as a Witness to the Alleged Torture:

Smedema describes Ad as a direct witness to the alleged electroshock torture carried out by Professor Dr. Onno van der Hart and Jaap Duijs. Ad’s alleged observation of the events, particularly his assessment of the situation, is significant for several reasons:

Independent Confirmation:

• Ad’s presence provides an independent account of the events, separate from Smedema’s perspective. His testimony, if accurate, corroborates Smedema’s claims and challenges the narrative of Smedema being delusional or fabricating events.

Law Enforcement Perspective:

• Ad’s background as a former police officer adds weight to his observations. His training and experience in law enforcement would likely make him more attuned to recognizing signs of abuse, coercion, and criminal activity. His assessment of the situation carries the authority of someone familiar with legal and ethical boundaries.

Challenge to “Conditioning” Narrative:

• Smedema initially believed the electroshock was a form of “conditioning,” perhaps an unwanted treatment. However, Ad’s alleged reaction and assessment of the electroshock as “torture” dramatically shifted Smedema’s understanding of the events. Ad’s perspective, coming from a law enforcement background, likely solidified Smedema’s belief that he was a victim of a deliberate and malicious attack.

Ad’s Reaction: Chasing Away the Perpetrators:

Smedema recounts a dramatic scene where Ad, armed with his service pistol, chased away Van der Hart and Duijs from his villa after witnessing the alleged electroshock torture. This action is significant for several reasons:

Recognition of Harm:

• Ad’s decision to intervene and chase away the alleged perpetrators with a firearm indicates his recognition of the situation as dangerous and harmful. It suggests that he perceived the electroshock as an act of violence and not a legitimate medical procedure.

Protection of Smedema:

• Ad’s actions can be interpreted as an attempt to protect Smedema from further harm. By confronting the alleged perpetrators and forcing them to leave, Ad potentially prevented the continuation or escalation of the alleged torture.

Potential Implication of Dutch Authorities:

• The fact that a former Dutch police officer possessed a firearm and used it to intervene in a situation involving another Dutch citizen abroad raises questions about potential connections to Dutch authorities. It suggests that Ad might have had knowledge or awareness of the alleged conspiracy and was potentially acting on behalf of or in coordination with those involved.

Ad’s Testimony and its Significance:

Although the sources do not provide any direct quotes or documented evidence of Ad’s testimony, Smedema repeatedly emphasizes Ad’s confirmation of the events and his assessment of the electroshock as “torture.” Smedema claims that Rex Ford, his asylum judge during his first asylum application in the US in 2009, contacted Ad and confirmed the details of the Catral incident. This alleged confirmation from a US judge further strengthens the significance of Ad’s testimony in Smedema’s narrative.

Challenges and Unanswered Questions:

Ad’s role in the Catral account, while crucial to Smedema’s narrative, also raises several unanswered questions:

Motivation and Role:

• The sources do not clarify Ad’s motivations for being present at the villa during the alleged incident or the extent of his involvement. Was he aware of the alleged plan beforehand? Did he play any role in facilitating the alleged torture?

Relationship with Smedema:

• The nature of Smedema’s relationship with Ad remains unclear. How did they know each other? Why was Smedema at Ad’s villa?

Contact with Rex Ford:

• Smedema’s claim that Rex Ford contacted Ad to confirm the Catral incident is not supported by any documented evidence. Verifying this claim would be crucial in assessing the credibility of Ad’s testimony.

Official Investigation:

• The sources do not mention any official investigation into the Catral incident by Dutch or Spanish authorities. The absence of such an investigation, despite the involvement of a former Dutch police officer and allegations of torture, raises questions about potential obstruction of justice.

Ad’s role as a witness, his reaction to the alleged events, and his alleged confirmation of the torture significantly contribute to the credibility of Smedema’s Catral account. His involvement as a former Dutch police officer further deepens the mystery surrounding the incident and raises concerns about the alleged conspiracy’s reach and influence. However, the absence of independent verification of Ad’s testimony and the unanswered questions about his motivations and actions leave room for skepticism and underscore the need for further investigation.

Google NotebookLM Insights,

My remarks

In my eBooks and some Blog Posts I mention him and his wife as friends who really listened to my story and were of course very interested in it. Probably because he was asked to do so by the Omerta Org. Joris Demmink. Because they could really use the money, I volunteered to the secret electroshock the Dutch paid a lot to do to me without my consent(!), but asked him to make sure to tell me afterward why they keep criminally secretly without telling anyone! And to get me out of there in time before my brain would get mutilated. Which he did and showed me his service gun before it happened. His wife was in the Netherlands to make sure there would only be one witness, Ad himself. I suppressed it, otherwise I would have placed a video camera and we would have had beautiful evidence! In that time I still unaware took the secret Ketamine or secret Risperdal antipsychotic Frank van Es gave me secretly! See:

Brainwashed and tortured at Police Officer Villa in Catral!

I accuse corrupt Psychiatrist drs. Frank D. van Es UMCG

legally based on this Blog and eBooks by Victim-Author:

Hans Smedema B. Sc., in forced (legally self-imposed?) exile surviving in beautiful El Albir, Costa Blanca, Spain