Smedema’s Allegations of Dutch Government Obstruction of Justice

Hans Smedema alleges that the Dutch government has engaged in a systematic and multifaceted campaign to obstruct justice in his case, using a range of tactics to silence him, discredit his accusations, and prevent him from obtaining legal redress. He claims these actions are rooted in a “Royal Special Decree” allegedly issued by Queen Juliana in 1972/73, which he believes granted immunity to the perpetrators involved in crimes against him and his wife and placed him under the control of a clandestine network known as the “Omerta Organization” [1-3]. This alleged decree, according to Smedema, has been used as justification to deny him access to information, block investigations, and silence anyone attempting to assist him, effectively placing him outside the reach of the normal legal framework [1, 4-7].

Smedema cites several specific actions that he believes demonstrate the Dutch government’s obstruction of justice:

1. Denial of Legal Representation:

Smedema consistently emphasizes the systematic denial of legal representation as a core tactic in his alleged isolation and silencing. He claims that since 2000, lawyers in both the Netherlands and the United States have either been intimidated or explicitly instructed not to take his case due to the alleged involvement of the Dutch Royal family and the classification of his case as a “State Secret” [5, 8-12]. He recounts numerous instances where lawyers, after initially expressing interest in representing him, abruptly withdrew their services, citing pressure from unnamed sources [4, 8, 10, 12-15]. Smedema points to specific lawyers like Ad Speksnijder as prime examples, alleging that they were pressured by the Ministry of Justice to withhold assistance [4-6, 10, 14, 16, 17]. He further claims that professional legal bodies, such as the Dutch Bar Association and the disciplinary board for lawyers, were complicit in denying him representation, refusing to appoint him a lawyer despite his claims of being unable to secure representation due to the alleged conspiracy [7, 16, 18, 19].

This alleged obstruction left Smedema navigating complex legal systems without proper guidance, severely undermining his ability to pursue justice effectively [8, 16]. He argues that this denial of legal assistance is a deliberate strategy to silence him and prevent him from pursuing justice through legal avenues [10, 11]. He feels that this consistent denial of legal representation reinforces his sense of isolation and powerlessness, as it strips him of the essential support needed to navigate complex legal processes and effectively present his case [8, 12, 15].

2. Blocking the Filing of Charges and Investigations:

Smedema asserts that his numerous attempts to formally report alleged crimes to the police, starting in the Netherlands and continuing in Spain, were consistently thwarted [7, 9, 13, 16, 17, 20, 21]. He claims that police officers, allegedly acting under orders from the Ministry of Justice, refused to document his accusations or initiate investigations, effectively preventing his allegations from being formally examined and protecting those in power [7, 9, 12, 13, 16, 17, 20, 22].

Smedema provides specific examples of this alleged obstruction, highlighting instances where police intervention was allegedly blocked. He points to Haye Bruinsma, a vice detective with the Drachten police, who Smedema claims was explicitly forbidden by the Ministry of Justice from filing an official report (Proces-Verbaal) regarding Smedema’s allegations of false accusations against him [8, 23, 24]. He also cites the case of Ruud Rosingh, a managing prosecutor and a personal friend of Smedema’s, who initiated an investigation into the alleged rape of Smedema’s wife but was allegedly forced to relocate by the Ministry of Justice when he refused to halt the investigation [20, 23, 24]. These specific instances, if true, suggest a pattern of intervention by the Ministry of Justice to suppress investigations that could potentially expose wrongdoing and threaten powerful individuals.

3. Manipulation and Suppression of Evidence:

Smedema accuses the Dutch government of systematically manipulating, suppressing, or destroying evidence related to his case [9, 12, 13, 16, 19, 25]. He alleges that crucial documents, including his medical records, police files, intelligence reports, and a document he calls the “Frankfurt Dossier,” have been altered, deleted, or made inaccessible to him [9, 13, 16, 19, 20, 25]. He points to inconsistencies in official records, missing files, and altered medical reports as proof of this alleged tampering, claiming it aims to discredit him and uphold the alleged cover-up [9, 12, 13, 16, 25].

Smedema highlights several specific examples of this alleged evidence manipulation. He claims that a scar related to his alleged forced sterilization was dismissed as “normal skin damage” in his medical records, despite a police photographer documenting it, a procedure he believes is usually done when a crime is suspected [16, 25]. He also alleges that 50 files related to his case were deleted by the Ministry of Justice and the Dutch intelligence agency, AIVD [16, 19, 25]. He repeatedly mentions the “Frankfurt Dossier,” an intelligence file he claims contained incriminating information, alleging that it was erased within three days of its discovery [16, 19, 25, 26]. He draws a parallel between the alleged disappearance of the “Frankfurt Dossier” and the forged documents used in the Dreyfus Affair, suggesting a deliberate attempt to conceal evidence and protect those in power [8, 26]. He believes that by removing or altering key pieces of information, the alleged conspirators could create a false narrative that dismisses his claims and portrays him as unreliable, making it more difficult for him to prove his accusations.

4. Exploitation of Legal Procedures and Loopholes:

Smedema claims that the Dutch government has used legal technicalities and loopholes to obstruct his pursuit of justice both domestically and internationally [6, 9, 13, 16, 27-30]. He alleges that they manipulated procedures to secure unfavorable rulings, denied him due process, and used legal technicalities to dismiss his complaints [6, 9, 13, 16, 27]. He highlights the alleged misuse of a bilateral judicial treaty between the Netherlands and the US, claiming that it was exploited to prevent him from gaining asylum in the US [6, 13, 16, 28-32]. He believes that this treaty, designed for legal cooperation, prioritizes the protection of the Dutch Crown over his individual rights and justice, making it impossible for him to find refuge in the United States [31, 33].

5. Exploiting “State Security” as a Shield:

Smedema alleges that the Dutch government repeatedly invokes “state security” as a justification for denying him access to information, blocking legal representation, and obstructing investigations into his allegations [1, 14, 34-36]. He claims that Joris Demmink, the former Secretary-General of the Dutch Ministry of Justice, was instrumental in convincing the government that investigating his claims would threaten national security, effectively creating a barrier to justice [1, 17, 37-41]. He believes that this “State Security” designation enables the Dutch government to employ extreme measures to silence him, including manipulating legal processes, suppressing evidence, and even interfering with international legal processes [42].

6. Creating a False Narrative of Mental Instability:

Smedema claims that the alleged conspirators have orchestrated a campaign to portray him as delusional or mentally ill to discredit his claims and justify dismissing his accusations [7, 9, 28, 39, 40, 42-46]. He alleges that he was subjected to forced medical interventions, including being drugged with antipsychotics and unnecessary electroshock therapy, as part of this strategy [7, 9, 28, 43, 46-50]. He claims that medical professionals, potentially acting under the influence of the Omerta Organization, labeled him with mental illnesses without proper evidence [46, 49]. He believes these diagnoses were intentionally used to invalidate his accusations, undermine his credibility, and prevent him from receiving legal assistance and justice [7, 9, 19, 28].

7. Witness Intimidation and Silencing:

Smedema claims that the alleged conspiracy extends beyond direct actions against him, alleging that individuals attempting to help him were also silenced or removed from their positions [8, 12, 15, 22, 49, 51-54]. He cites instances where individuals, including a police officer and a chief public prosecutor, were allegedly targeted for attempting to assist him [15, 51-53]. He believes that these actions, allegedly orchestrated by high-ranking officials within the Ministry of Justice like Joris Demmink, were intended to create a climate of fear and deter anyone from coming forward to support him [15, 51-53, 55]. He also claims that this silencing campaign includes the manipulation and intimidation of individuals close to him, including family members, friends, and professional contacts, creating a “cordon sanitaire” that isolates him and hinders his efforts to expose the alleged conspiracy [9, 18, 19, 24, 33, 56-58].

8. International Interference and Treaty Exploitation:

Smedema claims that the Dutch government’s influence extends beyond the Netherlands, alleging that they have used their international relationships to obstruct his attempts to seek justice abroad [12, 29, 30]. He specifically alleges that they exploited a bilateral judicial treaty between the Netherlands and the US to prevent him from obtaining asylum in America [6, 13, 28-32, 37, 59]. He believes that this treaty, designed for legal cooperation, was misused to shield the Dutch government from scrutiny and accountability, prioritizing the protection of the Dutch Crown over his individual rights and justice [31, 33]. He also alleges that the Dutch government pressured authorities in Canada and Mexico to deny him entry and send him back to the Netherlands, preventing him from reaching the US and pursuing asylum there [59]. He claims that these actions demonstrate the lengths to which the Dutch government is willing to go to silence him and prevent international scrutiny of their alleged actions [29].

Conclusion

Smedema’s allegations paint a disturbing picture of a government actively working to suppress the truth and hinder his pursuit of justice. He believes that the alleged conspiracy’s power and influence have permeated various aspects of the Dutch legal system, making it nearly impossible for him to obtain a fair and impartial hearing. These alleged actions, if true, raise serious concerns about the Dutch government’s commitment to the rule of law, transparency, and accountability. However, it is important to note that these are allegations made by Hans Smedema, and they have not been independently verified. The sources provided consist mainly of excerpts from Smedema’s blog posts, legal documents, and ebooks, and they do not include official statements or external evidence corroborating his claims. The Dutch government has consistently denied any wrongdoing.

Google NotebookLM Insights,

legally based on my decades-long information on this Blog and eBooks by Victim-Author:

Hans Smedema B. Sc., in forced exile surviving in beautiful El Albir, Costa Blanca, Spain