Dossier Overview: Alleged Assassination Attempts, Suspicious Deaths, and Retaliation in the Hans Smedema Affair

Introduction: A Pattern of Violence and Intimidation

This dossier isolates for analysis allegations of five assassination attempts, two suspicious deaths or near-fatal incidents, and a systematic campaign of retaliation against at least six categories of individuals and professionals connected to the Hans Smedema Affair. These events are categorized to analyze a recurring pattern of conduct allegedly intended to enforce a multi-decade cover-up, colloquially termed a “doofpot,” and ensure impunity for the primary perpetrators. The strategic importance of these allegations is that they are presented not as isolated criminal acts, but as a coherent body of evidence demonstrating the use of lethal force and systemic intimidation to obstruct justice.

The analysis begins with the most direct physical interventions documented in the case files: the alleged attempts on the life of Mr. Smedema.

1. Alleged Assassination Attempts Against Hans Smedema

The case files document five distinct alleged attempts to murder Hans Smedema across several decades and multiple countries. The consistency and severity of these allegations form a central pillar of the overarching narrative of persecution, representing the most extreme expression of the conspiracy’s efforts to permanently silence him.

Date	Location	Alleged Method and Perpetrators	Reported Outcome and Context
Jan 29, 1975	Motel Bunnik, Zeist, Netherlands	Administration of an unspecified substance, allegedly ordered by Joris Demmink.	Confessed by perpetrator Jan van Beek in 1977. The alleged motive was fear that the truth regarding “mind control” would emerge following the birth of a child not fathered by Mr. Smedema.
c. 1980	Dronten / near Elburg, Netherlands	Staged dual-assassination attempt. Journalist Cees van ‘t Hoog was allegedly lured to Dronten, drugged, and intended to crash his car into Mr. Smedema’s vehicle near Elburg.	The attempt failed; Mr. van ‘t Hoog’s vehicle reportedly crashed just behind Mr. Smedema’s. This incident preceded the successful murder of Mr. van ‘t Hoog.
May 20, 2010	Benidorm, Spain	Electroshock torture and “conditioning.” Alleged perpetrators: Prof. Dr. Onno van der Hart and Jaap Duijs.	Described as the fourth murder attempt. Local police were allegedly instructed by a “higher Spanish level” not to intervene, indicating alleged international complicity.
Jan 29, 2016	Altea, Spain	A poison projectile fired from a distance.	Described as the fifth murder attempt. The projectile allegedly struck Mr. Smedema’s ear instead of his neck, which is reported to have saved his life but resulted in subsequent heart problems.

This pattern of alleged direct lethal force was not limited to Mr. Smedema; it extended to others who became entangled in the affair, demonstrating a tactical expansion of the cover-up’s enforcement from silencing the primary victim to eliminating key witnesses.

2. Suspicious Deaths and Near-Fatal Incidents

Beyond direct attempts on the protagonist’s life, the case files allege the suspicious deaths and near-fatal targeting of individuals who came too close to the truth. These incidents served as clear deterrents to other potential investigators and highlight the alleged ruthlessness of the cover-up.

2.1 The Murder of Cees van ‘t Hoog (1980)

The alleged murder of Cees van ‘t Hoog, a neighbor and journalist investigating the Smedema case, represents a critical escalation in the conspiracy’s methods—from targeting the primary victim to lethally silencing an independent journalistic inquiry. The staged car crash (detailed in Section 1) was reportedly the second failed attempt on his life in a week. While the official cause of death was recorded as a heart attack, case files allege he was murdered shortly after the crash failed. This claim is based on a subsequent alleged confession by Jan van Beek, who stated van ‘t Hoog’s investigation “came too close to the truth.” The dossier notes that in 2009, US Judge Rex J. Ford investigated the alleged murder, but the victim’s children refused to permit an exhumation.

2.2 The Near-Drowning of a Minor (2004/2005)

A near-fatal incident involved the 15-year-old daughter of a neighbor. She was allegedly drugged, brought under the mind control of Jaap Duijs, and compelled to swim across a cold canal where she drowned. Duijs is then alleged to have revived her. The purported motive was to prevent her from revealing his alleged sexual abuse of her. This incident is presented as an example of the extreme measures used to enforce silence and protect perpetrators.

In addition to these lethal or near-lethal outcomes, the conspiracy allegedly employed a wider range of systematic tactics to neutralize any individual who posed a potential threat to the cover-up.

3. A Campaign of Retaliation: The Neutralization of Allies, Officials, and Witnesses

The consistent pattern of retaliation against third parties who attempted to assist Mr. Smedema or investigate his claims constitutes powerful circumstantial evidence of a coordinated conspiracy with significant reach into state institutions. The professional and personal destruction of these individuals served to enforce the cover-up by isolating the primary victim and deterring any future assistance.

Chronology of Alleged Retaliation

Individual(s) Targeted	Role / Action Taken	Alleged Retaliation and Consequence	Key Timeframe
Al Rust	US CIA/Military Intelligence officer.	Discovered a 30+ page “Frankfurt Dossier” in 1983 detailing the abuse. For his efforts, he was wrongfully dismissed from Military Intelligence in 1987, faced false accusations, and was imprisoned. He won his legal case around 1996. The Dutch Royal House allegedly withheld crucial evidence in his US court case.	1983 – c. 1996
Ruud Rosingh	Managing prosecutor, Leeuwarden.	Initiated an investigation into the alleged rape of Mrs. Smedema. He was ordered by the College of Prosecutors General to halt the investigation and was subsequently forced to relocate by the Ministry of Justice when he refused.	1991
Haye Bruinsma	Police detective, Drachten.	Attempted to file an official report based on Mr. Smedema’s claims. He was allegedly forbidden from filing the report by the Ministry of Justice.	2004
Jack Smedema	Nephew of Hans Smedema; Rijkspolitie (State Police) officer.	Attempted to report the case to authorities. He allegedly lost his position as a direct consequence of this attempt to intervene.	c. 1990
“Ad”	Retired Dutch police detective.	Intervened during an alleged torture session in Catral, Spain, using his service pistol to chase away perpetrators Onno van der Hart and Jaap Duijs. He later confirmed the event to US Judge Rex J. Ford.	2008
Dutch Legal Professionals	Lawyers approached for legal representation.	Since 2000, lawyers, including prominent figures such as Bram Moszkowicz, have allegedly been intimidated, were “not allowed to help,” or suddenly ceased assistance, effectively denying Mr. Smedema access to legal counsel.	2000 – Present

This consistent pattern of professional and personal destruction serves as primary evidence for the claim of a deep-seated conspiracy designed to isolate the victim and protect the perpetrators.

4. Conclusion: Synthesis of a Coordinated Campaign

The allegations synthesized in this dossier—assassination attempts, suspicious deaths, and the systematic neutralization of third parties—collectively form a coherent narrative of a multi-decade campaign of intimidation and obstruction of justice. According to the source material, these are not random criminal acts but are presented as evidence of a “perfect crime,” demonstrating the lengths to which a state-level conspiracy will allegedly go to maintain absolute impunity and silence all avenues to the truth.

Google NotebookLM Plus Reports:

based on the legal-written-statements on this Legal-Blog by Victim-Author:

Hans Smedema B. Sc., in forced exile since 2008 surviving in beautiful El Albir, Costa Blanca, Spain