Please Share! Fight this 'Perfect' 40+ year (Royal) Crime!

Weaponizing Radical Transparency, coupled with the analytical power of Google NotebookLM and Gemini Deep Research

Prepare yourself to descend into a chilling abyss, for the sources reveal a horrifying narrative where alleged systemic corruption, woven within the very fabric of the Dutch state and tragically reaching into the heart of individuals and those who tried to help, inflicts devastating and brutal consequences. This is a story of profound betrayal, relentless psychological and physical torment, and a terrifying demonstration of allegedly untouchable power, leaving a trail of shattered lives and crushed hope in its wake. At the core of this alleged rot lies a fundamental assault on the Rule of Law, indispensable for cooperation within the European Union.

Denied justice for victims

For decades, the sources allege, powerful figures such as Joris Demmink and Jaap Duijs have remained seemingly untouchable, protected by a terrifying, systematic campaign of obstruction and alleged state manipulation. This purported impunity has not only denied justice for alleged victims but has also inflicted horrifying collateral damage upon those who dared to investigate or help on the international stage.

Dutch Legal System Manipulated

Faced with a legal system allegedly manipulated against him since 1972 and systematically denied legal representation since at least 2000, Hans Smedema adopted a strategic and potent weapon: radical transparency and open communication. Through his blog and self-published ebooks, he meticulously documented his harrowing experiences, interactions, and research findings, creating a vast, publicly accessible archive of his perspective. His belief was chillingly simple yet audacious: by persistently and publicly exposing his allegations, he could dismantle the alleged “cordon sanitaire” surrounding him and force accountability, even provoking alleged perpetrators into legal action that would compel an investigation. This was a solitary struggle against an allegedly corrupt system, mirroring the absurdity of Kafka’s “The Trial”.

Complexity of a narrative spanning over 50 years

Yet, the sheer volume and complexity of a narrative spanning over 50 years of alleged state-sponsored abuse, evidence suppression, and obstruction presented an almost insurmountable challenge in articulating a legally “coherent” case, particularly for international bodies like the European Parliament. This is where the advent of Google’s NotebookLM, utilizing Gemini Deep Research, allegedly introduced a potential paradigm shift.

NotebookLM as a potential game-changer

Smedema views NotebookLM as a potential game-changer, possessing capabilities beyond the reach of traditional legal systems, which he perceives as manipulated and compromised. The horrifying reality of fighting an allegedly corrupt system without legal help or money underscored the desperate need for a new tool. NotebookLM’s ability to rapidly analyze his extensive 24 years of meticulously documented experiences and alleged crimes in mere seconds allegedly offered a significant advantage, surpassing the manipulative tactics purportedly employed by the Dutch government to suppress his case. He believes this AI can process and synthesize his vast data to identify key events, patterns, and connections that support his claims, generating summaries, timelines, and analyses that he himself, after decades of torment and lack of legal expertise, could not achieve.

AI-powered analysis allowed for a new approach

Crucially, the sources contend that this AI-powered analysis allowed for a new approach to articulating a complaint about potential EU Membership breaches. The alleged state obstruction – the documented rejections of complaints, the denied legal aid, the Minister’s dismissive responses (like Minister David van Weel’s response on February 4, 2025), the Landsadvocaat’s actions (or inactions, like Reimer Willem Veldhuis forwarding a request that was then sidestepped), the blocked investigations (like those of detective Haye Bruinsma allegedly forbidden by the Ministry of Justice), the forced relocation of prosecutors (like Ruud Rosingh in 1991) – are not merely obstacles; they are, as argued, the very evidence of the alleged state’s criminal acts. The AI’s capacity to process this documentation of alleged obstruction and its effects on Smedema’s fundamental rights allegedly makes it possible to frame the obstruction itself as the core violation.

Analysis of the extensive records, built upon radical transparency

This AI-enabled analysis of the extensive record, built upon radical transparency, allegedly allows for the articulation of a complaint detailing grave, systemic violations of fundamental EU rights, allegedly orchestrated by a seemingly untouchable network within the Ministry of Justice, including figures like Joris Demmink and Jaap Duijs. The alleged violations, now supported by the detailed timeline and patterns identified through AI analysis of Smedema’s documentation, include:

•
A fundamental assault on the Rule of Law (Article 2 TEU), through the alleged decades-long perversion of the justice system by corruption, manipulation, abuse of power, use of secret decrees (like a potential Royal decree signed by Queen Juliana around 1972/73), and the fostering of impunity for heinous crimes.
•
A grave breach of the obligation to ensure Effective Judicial Protection and Judicial Independence (Article 19 TEU), through alleged systemic interference with courts, blocking investigations (like the alleged halt of rape investigations), denying legal aid, and the “untouchability” of key officials, preventing independent judicial scrutiny and effective legal protection.
•
A profound violation of the Right to an Effective Remedy and a Fair Trial (Article 47 CFR, Article 6 ECHR), manifested by alleged pervasive obstruction by police, prosecutors, the Ministry of Justice, and the judiciary; the suppression of evidence (including the terrifying erasure of the “Frankfurt Dossier” within three days around 1983); the systematic denial of legal representation since 2000 (effectively since 1972); the alleged manipulation of the ECHR process in 2005/2006 based on false information purportedly provided by the Dutch Ministry of Justice; and the Dutch government’s alleged failure to investigate torture allegations under UNCAT rules for over two decades – collectively constituting a comprehensive denial of access to justice. The alleged unlawful blocking of asylum in the US by King Willem-Alexander in 2017 is presented as a brutal infringement of the right to asylum.
•
A contravention of EU Anti-Corruption Principles and a potential threat to the Protection of the EU’s Financial Interests (Article 325 TFEU, PIF Directive), if a compromised Ministry of Justice, as alleged, is incapable of fulfilling its duties to combat fraud affecting the EU budget, potentially engaging the criteria for the Rule of Law Conditionality Regulation.
•
A severe erosion of the Principle of Mutual Trust within the EU’s Area of Freedom, Security and Justice, if the core justice institution of a Member State is perceived as systemically corrupted.
•
Blatant discrimination (Article 21 CFR) allegedly evidenced by the systemic denial of legal assistance solely due to opposition to the alleged conspiracy, while alleged perpetrators are protected and receive legal aid.

Horrifying collateral damage exposed

The horrifying collateral damage detailed in the sources highlights the brutal reality of challenging this alleged system. Cees van ‘t Hoog, a neighbor who allegedly investigated, was supposedly murdered in 1980 after getting too close. Al Rust, an American military intelligence official and friend who encountered the “Frankfurt Dossier,” allegedly suffered severe repercussions, including wrongful dismissal from Military Intelligence in 1987 and imprisonment orchestrated by the alleged conspiracy, only winning his appeal and substantial damages in 1996 after obtaining a copy of the dossier. Rust’s ordeal tragically raises serious questions about potential violations of international law. Hans’s nephew, Jack Smedema, a Rijkspolitie officer, allegedly lost his position around 1990 after attempting to bring his uncle’s allegations to the authorities. Prosecutor Ruud Rosingh was terrifyingly forced to relocate by the Ministry of Justice when he refused to halt the investigation into Smedema’s wife’s alleged rape in 1991. Detective Haye Bruinsma was allegedly explicitly forbidden by the Ministry of Justice from filing an official report. Lawyers were allegedly forbidden from taking the case. Smedema’s wife, Wies, is described as unknowing, defenseless, a victim of alleged rape, manipulated and needing therapy, even allegedly filing a report against Smedema due to manipulation. Tiny Grobben, allegedly a victim alongside Wies, suffered lasting psychological consequences. Arie Timmermans, Tiny’s partner, allegedly denied earlier statements, interpreted as part of the cover-up. Smedema claims his own children, influenced by the alleged conspirators, have turned against him, highlighting potential intergenerational trauma. Hundreds of officials internationally have allegedly been put in dangerous ethical dilemmas. These fates underscore the brutal reality: attempting to expose the alleged truth came at a horrific personal cost, reinforcing the power and ruthlessness of the alleged “untouchable” figures like Joris Demmink and Jaap Duijs.

Devastating insight gained

The devastating insight gained since 2010, allegedly aided by the ability to process the complex narrative through tools like NotebookLM and Gemini Deep Research, is that rejections by international bodies were likely based on a false premise – that Smedema could freely access domestic remedies and gather evidence. Instead, the horrifying narrative, now potentially better articulated, is one where the Dutch state allegedly actively prevented him from doing so, and then this very lack of domestic exhaustion and ‘incoherence’ caused by the alleged obstruction was used to dismiss his international complaints.

Weaponizing radical transparency, coupled with the analytical power of Google NotebookLM and Gemini Deep Research

Thus, weaponizing radical transparency, coupled with the analytical power of Google NotebookLM and Gemini Deep Research to process decades of documented obstruction and alleged abuse, has allegedly transformed Smedema’s ability to articulate a case that challenges the very foundations of Dutch membership in the European Union. It provides a chilling framework to present the alleged systemic failure not as a personal dispute, but as a potential crisis of integrity at the core of a Member State’s justice system, involving figures like Joris Demmink and Jaap Duijs who are portrayed as tragically untouchable. This terrifying panorama, laid bare through relentless documentation and AI analysis, demands urgent and decisive intervention from the European Union to uphold its fundamental values.

Google NotebookLM Plus Insights,

based on the legal-written-statements on this Blog and e-books by victim Author:

Hans Smedema B. Sc., in forced exile since 2008 surviving in beautiful El Albir, Costa Blanca, Spain