The Smedema Affair: A Media Guide for Investigative Reporting

Main text

To effectively support upcoming legal action, the media and journalists should focus on the following key events and themes from Hans Smedema’s narrative, prioritizing those with potential for independent verification and public interest:

1. The “Frankfurt Dossier” and Its Alleged Erasure:

• Focus: This 30+ page Dutch intelligence file, allegedly containing incriminating information about Smedema and the conspiracy, was allegedly discovered during his screening at the 97th General Army Hospital in Frankfurt and erased within three days [1].
• Why it Matters: The alleged existence and erasure of this dossier points to a potential cover-up. Al Rust, a key figure in Smedema’s narrative, allegedly obtained a copy of the erased file, which was instrumental in his winning his appeal against wrongful dismissal [1].
• Media Angle: Investigative journalists could attempt to verify the existence of the “Frankfurt Dossier” through official channels, potentially filing Freedom of Information Act requests or seeking testimonies from individuals involved in Smedema’s screening in Frankfurt. Highlighting the alleged erasure of potentially incriminating evidence could raise public interest and pressure authorities for an explanation.

2. The Catral Incident and Allegations of Torture:

• Focus: Smedema claims a significant event occurred in Catral, Spain, involving electroshock therapy administered by a prominent psychologist and potential involvement of the Dutch government [2, 3].
• Why it Matters: This incident, if verifiable, could constitute a serious human rights violation and strengthen Smedema’s claims of a coordinated campaign against him.
• Media Angle: Journalists could investigate this incident through local authorities in Catral or seek medical records or testimonies from individuals allegedly present. Obtaining any supporting evidence, such as medical reports or witness statements, would add significant weight to Smedema’s allegations.

3. The KLM Flight Incident and Alleged Royal Interference:

• Focus: Smedema dramatically recounts King Willem-Alexander personally blocking his asylum offer while serving as co-pilot on a KLM flight [2, 4, 5].
• Why it Matters: This incident, if true, points to potential abuse of power at the highest level and direct involvement of the Dutch Royal Family in Smedema’s case.
• Media Angle: While verifying the specifics of this alleged encounter might be challenging, journalists could focus on corroborating Smedema’s presence on the flight through passenger manifests and crew information. Additionally, highlighting the legal implications of potential royal interference in a legal matter could garner public attention and legal scrutiny.

4. Smedema’s Attempts to Obtain Legal Representation and Alleged Obstruction:

• Focus: Smedema consistently claims that he has been unable to secure legal representation due to intimidation and the alleged “cordon sanitaire” surrounding him [2, 6-13].
• Why it Matters: The alleged difficulty in obtaining legal counsel reinforces Smedema’s narrative of a powerful conspiracy silencing dissenting voices and obstructing justice.
• Media Angle: Journalists could interview lawyers who allegedly refused to represent Smedema, seeking their perspectives while adhering to ethical considerations regarding client confidentiality. Additionally, highlighting the broader implications of potential obstruction of access to justice could resonate with the public and legal experts.

5. The Role of the Media and Allegations of a “Media Blackout”:

• Focus: Smedema repeatedly criticizes the Dutch media for their silence on his case, alleging a deliberate suppression of information [14-18].
• Why it Matters: Highlighting the alleged media blackout itself could create a paradox, potentially forcing the media to address Smedema’s claims and break the alleged silence.
• Media Angle: Journalists could analyze Smedema’s allegations of media suppression, examining potential reasons for the lack of coverage and exploring the role of journalistic ethics and self-censorship in reporting on sensitive topics involving powerful individuals and institutions.

6. Smedema’s Persistent Documentation and Use of Multiple Platforms:

• Focus: Smedema meticulously documents his experiences, accusations, and evidence-gathering efforts across various platforms, including self-published books, his blog, legal documents, and correspondence [2-11, 14-16, 19-28].
• Why it Matters: This persistent documentation, while requiring verification, showcases Smedema’s unwavering commitment to his narrative and provides a wealth of information for potential investigation.
• Media Angle: Journalists could analyze the consistency and evolution of Smedema’s narrative across these platforms, highlighting key events and potential leads for further investigation. Additionally, presenting Smedema’s meticulous documentation to legal experts could bolster the credibility of his claims and support legal action.

General Considerations for Media Coverage:

• Verification: While Smedema provides a detailed and consistent narrative, independent verification of his claims is crucial. Journalists should focus on corroborating events and seeking evidence from multiple sources.
• Balance and Objectivity: Presenting a balanced perspective is essential. Journalists should avoid sensationalizing Smedema’s claims while also giving voice to those he accuses and considering alternative perspectives.
• Ethical Reporting: Smedema’s case involves sensitive allegations of abuse and potential mental health concerns. Journalists should approach reporting with empathy, avoiding stigmatizing language and respecting the privacy of individuals involved.
• Legal Implications: Reporting on Smedema’s case should be mindful of potential legal consequences, particularly regarding defamation and privacy laws.
• Public Interest: Ultimately, media coverage should be driven by the public interest, focusing on potential human rights violations, abuse of power, and the importance of access to justice.

By strategically focusing on these key events and themes, the media and journalists can contribute to uncovering the truth in the Hans Smedema affair, supporting legal action, and holding those responsible accountable, if Smedema’s allegations are proven true.

Google NotebookLM Insights,

based on the true-crime chronologically in 24 horrifying years ‘legal written statements’ with slowly increasing insights in the complex unbelievable conspiracy on this Blog and eBooks by Victim-Author:

Hans Smedema B. Sc., in forced exile surviving in beautiful El Albir, Costa Blanca, Spain