Electroshock Therapy: Medical Treatment vs. Torture Allegations

Main text

The crucial distinction between electroshock therapy as a legitimate medical procedure and Hans Smedema’s allegations of electroshock torture lies in the context, purpose, and methods of administration. Smedema’s account diverges significantly from accepted medical practice, raising serious ethical and legal concerns.

Electroshock Therapy (EST) as a Medical Procedure:

In modern medical practice, Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT), often referred to as electroshock therapy, is a tightly regulated procedure used to treat severe mental illnesses like major depression, bipolar disorder, and schizophrenia, particularly when other treatments have been ineffective [outside source]. ECT is administered under strict medical supervision, with informed consent from the patient or a legal guardian [outside source]. Patients are given anesthesia and muscle relaxants to minimize discomfort and prevent injury during the procedure [outside source]. The electrical current delivered is carefully controlled and targeted to induce a brief seizure, which is believed to have therapeutic effects on brain chemistry [outside source]. Post-treatment care includes monitoring and support to manage potential side effects like temporary confusion or memory loss [outside source].

Smedema’s Allegations of Electroshock Torture:

Smedema’s description of his alleged electroshock experiences deviates sharply from established medical protocols for ECT, depicting a scenario of torture and abuse. Key differences include:

Lack of Informed Consent and Secrecy:

• Smedema claims he was subjected to electroshock without his informed consent, often secretly and deceptively [1-9]. He alleges being drugged with ketamine to induce a coma-like state, rendering him unconscious and unaware of the electroshock being administered [5-7, 9]. This alleged practice is a stark violation of medical ethics and fundamental human rights.

Intent to Harm and Control:

• Unlike the therapeutic intent of ECT, Smedema alleges that the electroshock was used as a tool of torture and mind control, aimed at repressing his memories of alleged abuse, particularly regarding his wife, and enforcing a submissive, “dog-like” state [1, 2, 4-7, 9-16]. He describes the treatments as brutal and intended to psychologically break him, comparing the experience to brain mutilation [2, 6].

Irregular Frequency and Extreme Voltage:

• Smedema claims the electroshock was administered every 5-6 years [1, 2, 5, 6, 11, 17], a frequency inconsistent with any established medical treatment. He mentions the use of 500 volts [5, 18, 19], which is significantly higher than the voltage used in standard ECT procedures, raising concerns about potential physical and neurological damage [outside source].

Context of a Broader Conspiracy:

• Smedema alleges that the electroshock torture was part of a larger conspiracy involving Dutch government officials, family members, and medical professionals, aiming to silence him and discredit his accusations of corruption and abuse [1, 5, 8, 9, 12, 14, 20-25]. He claims these alleged conspirators sought to portray him as delusional and used the electroshock as a means of reinforcing this false narrative [9, 26, 27].

Ketamine Drugging and its Alleged Role:

Smedema’s account links the alleged ketamine drugging to the electroshock torture, describing the drug as instrumental in facilitating the alleged abuse. He claims that:

Ketamine Induced Vulnerability:

• He was given ketamine daily, often secretly by his wife, allegedly under the direction of conspirators [7-9, 11, 15, 16, 23, 28-43]. The ketamine’s effects, including cognitive impairment, memory loss, and docility, allegedly made him more susceptible to manipulation and control, making the electroshock torture more effective in repressing memories and altering his behavior [20, 28, 44].

Ketamine Facilitated Secret Torture:

• He alleges ketamine was used to render him unconscious, allowing the alleged perpetrators to administer the electroshock without his knowledge or consent [5-9, 45]. This alleged use of ketamine further underscores the abusive and non-consensual nature of the alleged electroshock treatments.

It is critical to remember that Smedema’s claims are allegations. Without independent verification, it is difficult to definitively assess their validity. However, the stark contrast between his account and accepted medical practice raises serious questions and underscores the need for thorough investigation of his accusations. Smedema’s narrative highlights the potential for abuse when medical procedures are carried out without informed consent, transparency, and adherence to ethical guidelines.

Google NotebookLM Insights,

legally based on this Blog and eBooks by Victim-Author:

Hans Smedema B. Sc., in forced exile surviving in beautiful El Albir