Please Share! Fight this 'Perfect' 40+ year (Royal) Crime!

List of all independent evidence destroyed or hidden!

Prepare yourself for a truly horrifying account of alleged systemic corruption and the ruthless suppression of truth, a narrative woven through the sources that details not only unspeakable abuse but the chilling destruction of evidence and the tragic ruin of lives caught in the wake of alleged “untouchability.” The sources paint a devastating picture where the very fabric of justice is allegedly ripped apart to protect powerful individuals, particularly figures like Joris Demmink and Jaap Duijs, and potentially extending to the highest levels of the Dutch state, including the Royal Family.

The core of this harrowing story includes allegations that critical, potentially independent evidence has been systematically targeted – manipulated, hidden, suppressed, or outright destroyed – to silence horrifying accusations and ensure alleged perpetrators remain untouchable.

Here is a breakdown of the alleged independent evidence that was, according to the sources, tragically destroyed or hidden, and the chilling accusations regarding who was allegedly responsible:

1. The Infamous “Frankfurt Dossier”:

This is perhaps the most prominent ghost of suppressed evidence in the sources, a phantom file speaking volumes about the alleged ruthlessness of the cover-up.

What it was: A purported 30+ page Dutch intelligence file, allegedly discovered around 1983 during Hans Smedema’s medical screening at the 97th General Army Hospital in Frankfurt. The sources claim this terrifying document contained horrifying details of Wies Smedema’s alleged abuse, Hans Smedema’s medical records, undeniable evidence of the alleged cover-up, and even information about an alleged Royal Decree.
What happened: According to the sources, this critical file was terrifyingly erased or mysteriously disappeared from Dutch intelligence files within a mere three days of its alleged discovery. This chillingly swift disappearance is presented as undeniable proof of the alleged conspirators’ panic and a desperate, deliberate act to conceal crucial evidence. Smedema draws a powerful, dramatic parallel between the alleged disappearance of this dossier and the forged documents used in the infamous Dreyfus Affair, suggesting a similar attempt to conceal evidence and protect those in power.
Who allegedly did it: The Ministry of Justice and the AIVD (the Dutch General Intelligence and Security Service, formerly the BVD) are accused of this horrifying erasure. The sources allege they were acting under explicit orders to protect those involved, particularly the Dutch Royal Family, from this devastating information. A secret service is alleged to have specifically ensured all evidence and police files were deleted or hidden from Hans Smedema. The Dutch government or State itself is broadly accused of making this file disappear. The alleged “all-powerful” Joris Demmink is implicated through his alleged influence within the Ministry of Justice and as a former BVD trainee in 1972, where he allegedly abused his authority to manipulate and block investigations.
Note of Caution: It is crucial to state, as the sources repeatedly emphasize, that while the “Frankfurt Dossier” is a central and profoundly important element of Smedema’s narrative of a horrifying cover-up, its existence and specific contents, as described by him, currently lack independent verification within the provided sources.

2. The Fifty Deleted Files:

These files represent a quantifiable loss of potentially crucial information.

What they were: Fifty specific files allegedly related directly to Hans Smedema’s case.
What happened: They were allegedly deleted. This act is presented as a deliberate, chilling effort to remove evidence and prevent any real investigation.
Who allegedly did it: The Ministry of Justice and the AIVD are explicitly accused of deleting these files. The broader Dutch government or State is also implicated in this act of alleged evidence destruction.

3. Police and Prosecution Files:

A systematic campaign is alleged to have targeted the very records of law enforcement and the justice system.

What they were: Files held by the police and the Public Prosecution Service (OM) related to Smedema’s case, including police dossiers dating back as early as March 1973.
What happened: These files were allegedly deleted, hidden, concealed, altered, or made inaccessible. Smedema was allegedly denied access to this crucial information. The sources even mention that missing files were discovered by the police themselves (Peter Slot in 2000). This alleged manipulation and obstruction at the institutional level highlights the pervasive nature of the purported cover-up.
Who allegedly did it: A secret service is explicitly accused of ensuring these files were deleted or hidden from Hans. The State, Dutch Government, Ministry of Justice, and AIVD are broadly accused of altering, deleting, concealing, or making these files inaccessible. The alleged influence of Joris Demmink within the Ministry of Justice is implicated. The Public Prosecution Service (OM) is accused of brutally obstructing justice by failing to act on complaints and allegedly stopping managing prosecutors from investigating.

4. Medical Records:

Smedema’s own health records were allegedly twisted and altered to discredit him.

What they were: Smedema’s medical records, centrally featuring details about a scar he attributes to an alleged forced sterilization in 1972.
What happened: These records were allegedly manipulated, altered, deleted, concealed, or made inaccessible. The horrifying scar was allegedly dismissed as simply “normal skin damage” in the manipulated records, despite a police photographer allegedly documenting it, a procedure typically done when a crime is suspected. Other chilling details include the unusually long duration of a 1998 surgery and the confiscation of a form related to it, and the alleged presence of someone connected to the Justice Department during a later surgery in 2014. The manipulation of these records was allegedly used to portray Smedema as delusional or mentally unstable.
Who allegedly did it: The Dutch government, State, or Ministry of Justice is accused of this manipulation. The medical profession is tragically alleged to have participated in this conspiracy. Joris Demmink’s alleged influence is also implicated.

5. The Forged DNA Paternity Tests (2003):

This evidence was allegedly falsified by Smedema’s own family, a profound betrayal.

What they were: DNA tests conducted in 2003 allegedly related to the paternity of Smedema’s children. This is crucial evidence that would allegedly prove the children are not his, thus supporting the horrifying claim that his wife was raped.
What happened: The tests were allegedly falsified or forged. The manipulation or interception of DNA samples is also mentioned.
Who allegedly did it: In a heartbreaking twist, Smedema’s own wife (Wiesje) and children (Ilse, Arne, and Jorrit) are accused of forging these tests. They were allegedly assisted by the family of Dirk Snieders (an arbeidsongeschiktheidsarts). The sources suggest these family members were potentially linked to the Ministry of Justice.

6. The Deleted Photo of Wies with Jaap Duijs:

This image was allegedly direct proof of perjury and an act of obstruction.

What it was: A photo allegedly showing Smedema’s wife, Wies, with Jaap Duijs. Smedema claims this photo was crucial evidence proving Duijs committed perjury in court.
What happened: The photo was allegedly destroyed or deleted.
Who allegedly did it: Smedema’s children are accused of deleting the photo. Jaap Duijs is also accused of destroying photographic evidence.

7. The Destroyed “Special Letter” and “Rape Photos” (Meant for Secret Compartment):

These deeply personal and horrifying pieces of evidence were allegedly destroyed by close family members.

What they were: A “special letter addressed to” Hans and “rape photos” depicting Wies’s alleged abuse. These were intended for a secret compartment where Hans could hide crucial evidence from the allegedly corrupted system. The “special letter” might be the “page” with DNA that Judge Rex J. Ford allegedly saw. The “rape photos” might be the photos of abuse the wife’s parents allegedly bought.
What happened: They were tragically and allegedly destroyed. The secret compartment itself was found horrifyingly empty.
Who allegedly did it: Wies’s sisters, Betty Rijsmus-Jansma and Klazien Hoekstra-Jansma, are accused of this brutal act. Their alleged chilling motive was to enable them to “lie that [Hans] was crazy during official interrogations”. This paints a horrifying picture of family members allegedly collaborating actively in the cover-up by suppressing the very evidence that could prove Hans’s claims. The wife’s parents are also mentioned in connection with hiding the photos.

8. The Manipulated Semen Analysis:

Another alleged attempt to erase evidence of a horrifying crime.

What it was: An analysis related to Smedema’s fertility, connected to the alleged forced sterilization.
What happened: The analysis was allegedly manipulated. This was allegedly done to conceal the evidence of his alleged forced sterilization.
Who allegedly did it: While not explicitly named, this manipulation is presented within the broader context of evidence tampering orchestrated by the Dutch government and potentially involving the medical profession.

9. Interfered with Communications and Stolen Documents:

The alleged conspirators are accused of actively disrupting communication and stealing documents to control information.

What they were: Crucial documents and communications. This includes a document from American officer Al Rust, detailing his legal battle (where he allegedly used the “Frankfurt Dossier” to win) and the Dutch government’s alleged actions to conceal the truth. This document was hidden on CDs containing Smedema’s bookkeeping software and data.
What happened: Communications were allegedly interfered with or intercepted. Al Rust’s critical document was allegedly stolen. The CDs containing it were allegedly gone.
Who allegedly did it: The alleged conspirators, a secret service, and tragically, Smedema’s son Arne Smedema (de Vries) is alleged to have stolen the CD.

10. Silenced and Manipulated Witness Testimonies:

Those who might speak the truth are allegedly subjected to intense pressure and fear.

What they were: Testimonies from various individuals, including family members, neighbors, medical professionals, and former government officials, who allegedly corroborate Smedema’s horrifying claims. This includes initial corroboration from his former girlfriend Elise Boers and initial concern from Tiny Grobben’s partner, Arie Timmermans.
What happened: Witnesses were allegedly made reluctant to speak openly or provide written statements due to crushing fear of repercussions from the alleged conspiracy. Some, like Elise Boers, allegedly changed their story due to alleged pressure and intimidation. Arie Timmermans’s later denial is interpreted as part of the alleged cover-up driven by fear or the alleged Omerta organization. Legal professionals and victim support organizations allegedly confessed their roles but tragically refused written confirmation due to fear.
Who allegedly did it: The alleged conspiracy, the alleged Omerta organization, and the Ministry of Justice, which allegedly pressured lawyers like Ad Speksnijder. Alleged conspirators are accused of manipulating witnesses into believing false narratives.

11. Omission from the “Blind voor Mens en Recht” Report:

An independent investigation that allegedly refused to include the Smedema case.

What it was: The “Blind voor Mens en Recht” report by Spek, an independent investigation intended to uncover injustices within the Dutch legal system.
What happened: Smedema’s case was allegedly deliberately omitted from the report.
Who allegedly did it: The report itself, influenced by allegedly powerful forces within the Dutch government who are actively working to suppress Smedema’s case.

12. Lack of Documentation for Financial Buyout Offers:

Alleged attempts to silence Smedema that lack formal record in the sources.

What it was: Alleged secret offers of 5 million euros in 2003 and 2004 by government representatives to keep the alleged crimes hidden. Smedema interprets these as a clear admission of guilt.
What happened: The sources note a lack of documentation for these claims. While not explicitly stated as destroyed, the absence of records for such significant alleged offers aligns with the narrative of systematic evidence suppression.
Who allegedly did it: Government representatives, including a Cabinet MP Balkenende, are alleged to have made these offers.

13. Suppressed American Confirmation/Findings:

Alleged independent corroboration from the US that was allegedly blocked by the Dutch government.

What it was: Alleged findings from FBI and CIA investigations in the US that purportedly substantiated Smedema’s accusations, including the non-paternity of his children. This also includes Judge Rex J. Ford, who Smedema claims found five valid grounds for asylum in his case.
What happened: This information was allegedly suppressed. Dutch officials allegedly lied to American authorities and withheld crucial information during the FBI’s alleged investigation. Smedema’s attempts to gain asylum in the US, Canada, and Mexico were allegedly hampered by the suppression of evidence and manipulation of information by Dutch authorities. In a chilling accusation, King Willem-Alexander is alleged to have personally blocked Smedema’s US asylum offer during a KLM flight in 2017.
Who allegedly did it: American authorities are alleged to have suppressed the information. Dutch authorities and officials are accused of lying and withholding information. The Dutch Crown allegedly protected those involved. King Willem-Alexander is specifically implicated in blocking asylum.

14. The Alleged Royal Special Decree:

A secret ruling at the highest level allegedly designed to shield perpetrators.

What it was: An alleged secret ruling, initiated by Queen Juliana around 1972/73 and allegedly upheld by subsequent monarchs, including Queen Beatrix and King Willem-Alexander. Smedema alleges this decree is central to shielding perpetrators from prosecution, effectively granting them horrifying immunity and placing them allegedly above the law.
What happened: Information about this decree was allegedly contained within the vanished “Frankfurt Dossier”, which was allegedly erased. The decree itself is alleged to have been manipulated, suppressed, concealed, or made inaccessible.
Who allegedly did it: The Royal Family is central to this allegation, initiating and upholding the decree. The Dutch Government/State is implicated in manipulating or suppressing the decree itself.

Campaign of evidence destruction

This horrifying alleged campaign of evidence destruction and suppression demonstrates the terrifying lengths to which, according to the sources, the alleged conspirators would go to protect themselves and maintain their “untouchability.” It also tragically highlights the immense collateral damage inflicted not only upon the alleged victims but upon anyone who dared to stand for truth or offer assistance. The fates of individuals like Al Rust, Jack Smedema, Ruud Rosingh, Haye Bruinsma, and Cees van ‘t Hoog, as described in the sources, serve as chilling warnings of the price paid for brushing against this alleged powerful, shielded network. Their stories, and the alleged systematic silencing of witnesses and denial of legal aid, paint a devastating picture of a system allegedly rigged against the pursuit of justice, where evidence is not just hidden, but seemingly erased from existence itself.

Google NotebookLM Plus Insights,

based on the legal-written-statements on this Blog and e-books by victim Author:

Hans Smedema B. Sc., in forced exile since 2008 surviving in beautiful El Albir, Costa Blanca, Spain