Smedema Allegations: Manipulation, Exploitation, and Paternity Deception

Based on Hans Smedema’s allegations presented in the sources, Jan van Beek’s alleged success in fathering Ilse Smedema was a result of a premeditated and manipulative plan involving drugging, exploitation, and rendering Hans Smedema infertile. Smedema claims that Jan van Beek, his girlfriend Wies’s landlord in 1972, systematically abused her and orchestrated events to ensure that she would bear his child while preventing her from having children with Smedema.

Torture Girlfriend into Extra Emotional Personality! DIS

According to Smedema’s account, the initial steps in Jan van Beek’s alleged plan involved establishing control over Wies. Smedema states that Van Beek subjected Wies to “multiple rapes” and “gruwelijk mishandeld” her, turning her into a “seksslavin” through severe mistreatment, including the use of a “stroomstok” (possibly an electric cattle prod). This abuse allegedly led to Wies developing a “double personality” or Dissociative Identity Disorder (DID), where in her “emotional personality,” she would comply with Van Beek’s demands without the knowledge of her “normal person” personality. Smedema contends that Van Beek also drugged Wies with substances causing memory loss to conceal the abuse and exploitation.

Made infertile!

A crucial element of Van Beek’s alleged scheme, according to Smedema, was to make Smedema infertile. Smedema recalls Jan van Beek stating, “Kijk Hans, ik ga zo jouw beide ballen blokkeren zodat het je onvruchtbaar zal maken!” (Look Hans, I’m going to block both your testicles so that it will make you infertile!). Smedema believes this was done secretly and illegally, likely through drugging him. This act ensured that any child Wies conceived during their relationship would not be Smedema’s. Smedema claims he only discovered this around 2004, while his family, including his doctor, allegedly knew as early as 1975 but concealed it from him and Wies.

Insert IUD with a Broken Coil!

To further control the possibility of Wies becoming pregnant by someone other than himself, Smedema alleges that Jan van Beek secretly inserted a “broken coil” (an IUD) into Wies’s womb. This was done without Wies’s knowledge, as she was already using birth control pills in her “normal personality”. Smedema suggests the IUD was intentionally broken so that its string would not be visible during routine medical examinations, thus preventing immediate detection. The discovery of this IUD by a gynecologist in 1974, after the couple struggled to conceive, bewildered them as they were unaware of its insertion.

Their first child was from Rapist!

Smedema believes that Van Beek’s intention behind the IUD insertion was to prevent pregnancy until he was ready for Wies to conceive his child. Once Smedema was infertile and the IUD was eventually removed, Wies became pregnant with Ilse. Smedema recalls Van Beek’s confession in a phone call around 1977, where he allegedly boasted about how clever he was to ensure their first child was his by secretly making Smedema infertile and using the IUD. Van Beek reportedly stated that he had planned for Ilse to be his child.

Initiate Omerta Organisation!

Furthermore, Smedema alleges that a conspiracy involving the Dutch state, his family, and medical professionals was orchestrated to cover up these crimes and maintain the deception regarding Ilse’s paternity. He claims that DNA paternity tests conducted later were falsified with the help of Wies’s family to make it appear that he was Ilse’s father. Smedema asserts that his children, including Ilse, confessed in 2014 to participating in the fraud of the 2003 DNA tests.

In summary, according to Hans Smedema’s narrative, Jan van Beek allegedly succeeded in fathering Ilse Smedema through a combination of:

1.
Secretly rendering Hans Smedema infertile: This eliminated Smedema as the biological father.
2.
Drugging and manipulating Wies Smedema: This made her vulnerable to his control and sexual exploitation.
3.
Secretly inserting an IUD: This prevented Wies from conceiving with others until Van Beek was ready for her to have his child.
4.
Exploiting Wies to conceive: Once Smedema was infertile and the IUD was removed, Wies became pregnant with Van Beek’s child.
5.
Alleged cover-up and falsification of DNA tests: This maintained the deception about Ilse’s paternity for many years.

It is crucial to remember that these are allegations made by Hans Smedema, as explicitly noted in the sources. They have not been independently verified, and the sources primarily present Smedema’s perspective on these events.

Google NotebookLM Plus Insights,

based on the legal written statements on this Blog and eBooks by the victim Author:

Hans Smedema B. Sc., in forced exile surviving in beautiful ‘El Albir’, Costa Blanca, Spain