Hans Smedema: Allegations of Control and Isolation

Hans Smedema alleges that he was systematically isolated and controlled through a multifaceted campaign involving psychological manipulation, medical interventions, legal obstruction, and social engineering, all orchestrated by a network of individuals within the Dutch government, medical establishment, and even his own family [1-3]. He refers to this network as the “Omerta Organization,” and claims its primary objective was to silence him and discredit his claims of abuse and corruption within the Dutch government [3-6].

Here’s a breakdown of the key methods Smedema claims were used to isolate and control him, drawing from the sources and our conversation history:

1. The “Cordon Sanitaire” and Social Isolation:

Smedema describes a deliberate strategy called the “cordon sanitaire” orchestrated to isolate him from support and reinforce the perception of him as delusional [7-17]. He alleges this “cordon sanitaire” involved manipulating individuals close to him, including his wife, family members, friends, and professional contacts [7, 9-17].

• Manipulation of Relationships: Smedema claims that the Omerta influenced his relationships by bribing family members and his social circle [3, 4]. He alleges that individuals were manipulated into maintaining a false reality around him, reinforcing the narrative that he was mentally unstable [3, 4, 18, 19].
• Enforcement by Jaap Duijs: Smedema identifies Jaap Duijs, a French teacher and neighbor, as a key figure in enforcing the “cordon sanitaire” [7, 10, 20]. He claims that Duijs, appointed as his “guardian,” engaged in micromanagement and sabotage, intercepting his mail, sabotaging job opportunities, manipulating his wife, and planting a listening device in his home [7, 10, 20].
• Professional Isolation: The “cordon sanitaire” allegedly extended beyond his personal life, encompassing legal professionals, victim support organizations, and media outlets [11, 16, 19]. Smedema asserts that all Dutch victim support organizations were secretly instructed to deny him help [11, 16].
• Intimidation and Fear: Smedema believes these actions, allegedly orchestrated by high-ranking officials like Joris Demmink, were intended to create a climate of fear and deter anyone from coming forward to support him [9, 21, 22].

2. Medical Manipulation and the “Delusional” Narrative:

Smedema alleges that he was subjected to a series of forced medical interventions intended to discredit his claims and portray him as mentally unstable [3, 5, 14, 23-39].

• Forced Medical Interventions: Smedema claims he underwent forced medical interventions, including administration of ketamine, electroshock therapy, and misdiagnosis and treatment of mental illnesses [3, 5, 23-29, 31-39]. He alleges these interventions were orchestrated to control his behavior, suppress his memories, and portray him as mentally unstable, undermining his credibility [3, 5, 23, 24, 26-29, 31-36, 38, 39].
• Ketamine Drugging: Smedema claims that beginning in 1973, his wife administered ketamine daily in his vitamins or wine under the direction of Jaap Duijs [29, 40-42]. He attributes memory repression, personality changes, and a submissive state to this [29, 40-42].
• Electroshock Therapy: Smedema claims he was subjected to electroshock therapy, which he characterizes as torture, to repress memories and manipulate behavior [29, 34, 35, 38, 43-47]. He alleges electroshock therapy was administered in Sofia Hospital in Zwolle in 1975, Catral, Spain, in 2008, and Nightclub Pretty Woman, Benidorm, Spain, in 2010 [45, 48, 49].
• Misdiagnosis of Mental Illnesses: Smedema claims he was repeatedly misdiagnosed with mental illnesses to discredit him [29, 32, 34, 36-38, 50, 51]. He believes these diagnoses were deliberately fabricated to undermine his credibility and portray him as unreliable [29, 32, 34, 36-38, 50, 51]. He specifically accuses psychiatrist Bauke Koopmans and traumatologist Onno van der Hart of misdiagnosing him with delusional disorder, forcing him into psychiatric care, and administering antipsychotic drugs without his informed consent to further suppress his memory and discredit his claims [5, 29, 50, 51].
• “Gaslighting”: Smedema alleges that he was secretly drugged with antipsychotic medication disguised as “baby aspirin” to impair his cognitive function, make him appear delusional, and undermine his fight against the alleged conspiracy [29, 52, 53].

3. Legal Obstruction and Manipulation:

Smedema alleges that the Dutch government and justice system actively obstructed his efforts to seek justice through various means [3, 23, 27, 30, 36, 54-64].

• Denial of Legal Representation: Smedema asserts that he has been systematically denied access to legal representation [3, 23, 25-27, 30, 36, 54-64]. He believes lawyers were either intimidated or explicitly instructed not to represent him due to the alleged involvement of the Dutch Royal family and the classification of his case as a “State Secret” [26, 30, 56, 60, 65].
• Suppression of Evidence: Smedema alleges the Ministry of Justice actively suppressed or manipulated evidence, including medical records, legal documents, and the “Frankfurt Dossier,” making it difficult to prove his claims [3, 27, 30, 36, 58, 60, 61, 63, 64, 66-70]. He says files were deleted and altered, and he was denied access to information that could support his case [3, 27, 30, 36, 58, 60, 61, 63, 64, 66-70].
• Prevention from Filing Police Reports: Smedema states that his attempts to formally report the alleged crimes to the police were consistently thwarted [25, 27, 60, 62]. He asserts that police officers, acting on orders from the Ministry of Justice, refused to create official reports of his accusations [60, 62].
• Exploitation of Legal Procedures: Smedema accuses the Dutch government of exploiting legal procedures and loopholes to obstruct his pursuit of justice [60, 63].

4. Surveillance and Harassment:

Smedema believes his communications were monitored, his movements tracked, and his attempts to seek help sabotaged [3, 4, 6, 26, 64].

• AIVD Involvement: Smedema implicates the AIVD (the Dutch General Intelligence and Security Service) in surveillance, harassment, and information manipulation to discredit him and protect the alleged conspiracy [3, 6, 26, 64]. He claims that his phone and emails were tapped by the Dutch intelligence service (AIVD), ensuring his isolation and hindering his attempts to expose the truth [3, 26, 64].

5. International Interference:

Smedema claims the Dutch government used its influence internationally to obstruct his attempts to seek justice outside of the Netherlands [57].

• Asylum Requests: Smedema alleges that his asylum requests were met with interference from the Dutch government, which he believes actively worked to prevent him from reaching the US and exposing the truth on an international stage [71]. He claims this included pressure on Canadian and Mexican authorities to deny him entry and send him back to the Netherlands [71]. Smedema claims King Willem-Alexander personally blocked his asylum offer from the Department of Justice while serving as co-pilot on a KLM flight in 2017 [71].

The combined effect of these alleged tactics, according to Smedema, left him isolated, vulnerable, and unable to trust even those closest to him [2, 72, 73]. He claims that this systematic campaign of abuse and control led to the destruction of his career, personal life, and mental well-being [2, 72, 73].

Google NotebookLM Plus Insights,

based on the legal written statements on this Blog and eBooks by the victim Author:

Hans Smedema B. Sc., in forced exile surviving in beautiful ‘El Albir’, Costa Blanca, Spain