What is the role of the Dutch Royals in the suffering of Hans Smedema?

Hans Smedema alleges that the Dutch Royal Family is complicit in a decades-long conspiracy to silence him and protect high-ranking officials allegedly involved in crimes against him and his wife. He portrays the Royal Family as actively participating in the alleged cover-up to safeguard their reputation, even at the expense of justice. Smedema’s accusations against the Dutch Royal Family are central to his narrative of a broad conspiracy designed to silence him and protect high-ranking officials involved in crimes against him and his wife.

Core accusations against the Royal Family:

• Complicity in the Conspiracy: Smedema claims the Dutch Royal Family is complicit in a conspiracy to cover up crimes against him and his wife. He believes the Royal Family has actively worked to protect high-ranking officials, such as Joris Demmink, who Smedema alleges was involved in the initial sexual assault on his wife.
• Royal Special Decree: Smedema alleges that Queen Juliana issued a “Royal Special Decree” around 1972/73, which granted immunity to those involved in the alleged crimes against him and his wife. He believes this decree has been upheld by subsequent monarchs, including King Willem-Alexander, preventing him from obtaining justice within the Dutch legal system. Smedema, however, has not provided documentation or official confirmation of this decree’s existence.
• Obstruction of Justice: Smedema accuses the Royal Family of obstructing investigations, silencing witnesses, and preventing him from seeking justice. He believes the Royal Family used their influence to manipulate legal proceedings and deny him access to evidence.
• King Willem-Alexander’s Alleged Interference: Smedema claims that King Willem-Alexander, while serving as co-pilot on a KLM flight, personally intervened to block his asylum request in the United States. He alleges that the King lied to a US judge, stating that Smedema did not want asylum, which resulted in Smedema’s detention upon return to the Netherlands.
• Financial Inducements and the Omerta Organization: Smedema alleges he was offered substantial sums of money to remain silent about his accusations, which he interprets as attempts by the “Omerta Organization” to buy his silence and protect the alleged conspiracy. He believes the “Omerta Organization” acts on behalf of the Royal Family.
• Violation of Human Rights: Smedema alleges that the Dutch government and Royal Family have committed severe human rights violations against him and his wife, enabled by a special ruling issued by Queen Juliana around 1973. These violations include denying him a fair trial, blocking access to legal representation, obstructing justice, denying access to medical and justice files, blocking his asylum requests, and subjecting him to psychological torture and manipulation.

Specific claims and incidents:

• The Frankfurt Dossier: Smedema claims the “Frankfurt Dossier” was a Dutch intelligence file containing incriminating information about him, the alleged conspiracy, and the Royal Family’s involvement. He alleges this dossier disappeared shortly after its discovery, which fueled his suspicions of a cover-up.
• Forced Exile and Denial of Legal Assistance: Smedema believes his forced exile in Spain and the difficulty he faces in securing legal representation are orchestrated by the Royal Family to silence him and prevent him from accessing justice.
• Royal Medals of Honor: Smedema alleges individuals involved in the conspiracy against him received Royal medals of honor. He specifically names Rieks Perdok and Professor Onno van der Hart, who he accuses of heinous acts against him and his wife, as recipients of the Order of Orange-Nassau. Smedema’s brother, Johan, who Smedema accuses of leading the “Omerta criminal organization”, also allegedly received a Royal medal in 2018.

Smedema’s language when discussing the Dutch Royal Family is consistently accusatory and emotionally charged, revealing a deep sense of betrayal and anger. He frequently uses negative descriptors, portraying them as corrupt, criminal, heartless, and actively harmful to Dutch citizens.

Smedema believes the Dutch government’s actions stem from a desire to protect powerful individuals and institutions, including the Royal Family and high-ranking officials within the Ministry of Justice. He argues that these entities fear the exposure of their alleged involvement in the conspiracy, believing that an independent investigation could lead to negative publicity, legal repercussions, and potential damage to their reputation.

What human rights violations does Smedema allege?

Hans Smedema alleges numerous human rights violations by the Dutch government and Royal Family, characterizing them as systematic and stemming from a high-level conspiracy to silence him and protect those involved in his wife’s alleged abuse. Smedema contends that the Dutch government violated his human rights, specifically those outlined in the UN Convention Against Torture (UNCAT), by torturing him, drugging him, and subjecting him to cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment.

Specific human rights violations Smedema alleges:

1. Right to Asylum Violation: Smedema claims King Willem-Alexander blocked his asylum offer in the US, interfering with his right to seek asylum from persecution, violating Article 19 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. He believes the Dutch government’s desire to protect its reputation motivated this action to avoid scrutiny that would accompany an investigation into his allegations.
2. Discrimination: Smedema asserts he was discriminated against due to his opposition to the alleged conspiracy. He faced persecution and denial of legal assistance, while those involved in the alleged crimes enjoyed protection, violating Article 21 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.
3. Fair Trial Denial: Smedema argues that the Dutch legal system failed to provide him with an effective remedy or a fair trial, violating Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights. He cites the refusal of lawyers to represent him, the alleged judicial bias, the suppression of evidence, and the prioritization of psychological evaluations over legitimate legal arguments as evidence of this violation. Smedema contends that the trials he faced were unfair and politically motivated, designed to discredit him and protect the Royals. He accuses judges of bias, predetermined outcomes, and denying him a proper defense.
4. Prohibition of Torture Violation: Smedema alleges being subjected to psychological torture through constant denial of information, deliberate attempts to label him delusional, and ongoing harassment and surveillance, violating Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights and Article 4 of Dutch Violations of Fundamental EU Rights. He specifically points to instances of forced psychiatric evaluations and medical interventions, such as electroshock therapy, as torture.
5. Denial of Legal Assistance: Smedema emphasizes the systematic denial of legal representation as a core tactic in his alleged isolation and silencing. He claims lawyers in the Netherlands and the United States have been intimidated or instructed not to take his case due to the Dutch Royal family’s alleged involvement and his case’s classification as a “State Secret”. Smedema says he was denied any information about the crimes against him and not allowed to officially file charges, and any investigation was denied by the Dutch government and Queen.
6. Right to Privacy Violation: Smedema claims his privacy has been violated through monitoring his communications, manipulating his medical records, and disseminating false information about his mental state. He accuses authorities of using these tactics to discredit him and control the narrative surrounding his case.
7. Freedom of Movement Violation: Smedema feels forced into exile in Spain to escape the alleged persecution in the Netherlands. His multiple attempts to seek asylum in the United States were also met with resistance, further demonstrating the government’s alleged efforts to silence him and prevent him from accessing international justice mechanisms.
8. Failure to Prevent Torture: Smedema argues the Dutch government failed to implement effective measures to prevent torture and other cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment, violating Article 2 of the UNCAT. He cites the alleged “Royal Special Decree” and the systematic denial of his rights as evidence of a system that enables and protects those who commit acts of torture.
9. Medical Experimentation without Consent: Smedema alleges he was subjected without his free consent to medical or scientific experimentation, contravening Article 7.
10. Right to Life, Liberty, and Security Violation: Smedema asserts that his and his wife’s right to security was violated by the alleged inaction of the authorities in protecting them from the rapists. He claims that the government’s refusal to investigate and prosecute the perpetrators allowed the abuse to continue for years.
11. Suppression of Evidence and Witnesses: Smedema claims that the Dutch government has actively concealed and manipulated evidence to protect the Royals and maintain the alleged cover-up. He accuses the police and prosecutors of refusing to investigate his allegations, even obstructing investigations that were initiated. He further claims that his attempts to present witnesses and evidence during court hearings were consistently denied.

Smedema’s claims, while lacking independent verification, raise concerns about potential abuses of power and the Dutch justice system’s ability to uphold the rule of law. He has pursued various legal avenues, both domestically and internationally, to seek redress for the alleged injustices he and his wife have suffered. These actions include filing complaints with Dutch oversight bodies, seeking asylum in the United States, and communicating with international human rights organizations.

Google NotebookLM Plus Insights,

based on the legal written Statements on this Blog and eBooks by Victim-Author:

Hans Smedema B. Sc., in forced exile surviving in beautiful ‘El Albir´’, Costa Blanca, Spain