Last Updated 05/06/2025 published 01/06/2025 by Hans Smedema
Page Content
Systemic State Corruption and Obstruction in the Netherlands
Prepare yourself to delve into a chilling narrative, drawn directly from the provided sources, painting a horrifying picture of alleged systemic state corruption and obstruction in the Netherlands. This is not merely a tale of individual wrongdoing, but an alleged decades-long assault on justice itself, centered around figures repeatedly described as chillingly “untouchable,” most notably Joris Demmink and Jaap Duijs. The sources present a terrifying scenario where the very foundations of the legal system were allegedly manipulated and compromised to shield a criminal elite. The horrifying accounts within the sources allege that the intended safeguards of the Dutch state tragically proved insufficient or were actively neutralized in the face of a sophisticated, decades-long conspiracy allegedly orchestrated by high-ranking officials like Joris Demmink and Jaap Duijs, who are claimed to be “untouchable,” operating within a sinister web designed to ensure their impunity, even from the most horrific accusations.
How could individuals accused of heinous crimes remain beyond the reach of the law?
The chilling question that screams from the sources is: How could individuals accused of heinous crimes allegedly remain beyond the reach of the law for decades, seemingly untouchable by the very justice system Joris Demmink once led?. The sources offer a chilling, complex explanation rooted in allegations of a vast, systemic conspiracy and cover-up allegedly orchestrated from the highest echelons of the Dutch state.
The Untouchables!
At the ghastly core of this alleged conspiracy lie the figures of Joris Demmink and Jaap Duijs, repeatedly portrayed as chillingly “untouchable”. Joris Demmink, the former Secretary-General of the Dutch Ministry of Justice, is consistently identified as the alleged mastermind behind this entire sprawling nightmare. Smedema alleges Demmink was involved in horrifying abuse as early as 1972, an alleged act that purportedly triggered the decades-long cover-up specifically to protect him and other alleged perpetrators. The sources claim Demmink used his immense power and high position within the Ministry to brutally orchestrate the cover-up, obstruct justice, silence witnesses, and organize terrifying attacks against Smedema, allegedly ensuring his isolation and preventing him from exposing the horrifying truth. He is alleged to have been instrumental in convincing the government that investigating Smedema’s claims would threaten national security, thereby invoking “State Security” as a chilling shield. Smedema alleges Demmink, as the alleged “rapist-traitor” from 1972, chillingly exploited the situation to secure a position of power within the Dutch Ministry of Justice, ultimately rising to the rank of Secretary-General. He further claims Demmink allegedly orchestrated the cover-up from the very beginning. Jaap Duijs is portrayed as Demmink’s alleged operative, a key figure in the alleged ongoing abuse and manipulation, accused of repeatedly abusing Wies, controlling her through horrifying “mind control”, drugging Hans and Wies, and even participating in Hans’s alleged electroshock torture.
Horrifying panorama of alleged corruption
This alleged untouchability was not a matter of chance but the brutal reality created by a network of alleged complicity and obstruction spanning numerous institutions. The horrifying panorama of alleged corruption extends tragically beyond these central figures and the Ministry of Justice itself, involving a chilling web of other institutions and individuals allegedly corrupted or exploited by the alleged conspiracy.
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) Manipulation:
The Alleged Nucleus of the Obstruction
The Ministry of Justice is repeatedly described as the central player in orchestrating the cover-up and protecting perpetrators, particularly Demmink, from the horrifying consequences of their alleged actions. Decades of alleged systemic corruption and obstruction of justice within this very institution, responsible for upholding justice, are presented as a fundamental assault on the Rule of Law. Decisions regarding investigations, prosecutions, appointments, and access to legal aid can allegedly become twisted by illicit considerations, dragging public powers outside the bounds of the law and into the terrifying realm of the arbitrary. Hans Smedema’s relentless fight against this allegedly untouchable network within the Ministry of Justice tragically illustrates this potential violation. His attempts to file charges (e.g., in April 2000 and April 2004) were allegedly refused by police, purportedly because the Justice Department didn’t allow it. Minister David van Weel’s response on February 4, 2025, suggesting you “contact a lawyer” despite documented pleas about denial of representation, is presented as further evidence of this alleged denial of an effective remedy. Police officers, like detective Haye Bruinsma, were allegedly explicitly forbidden by the Ministry of Justice from filing official reports regarding Smedema’s horrifying allegations. Prosecutor Ruud Rosingh was allegedly forced to relocate by the Ministry of Justice when he refused to halt the investigation into Wies’s alleged rape on January 12, 1991. The Ministry of Justice is also accused of misleading international bodies, like the ECHR, allegedly providing false information in 2005/2006 that concealed the inability to secure legal representation, leading to a procedural rejection based on lack of domestic exhaustion.
The Police:
The Police are accused of refusing to investigate Smedema’s horrifying claims, ignoring crucial evidence, and participating in persecution. Police officers, like detective Haye Bruinsma in Drachten, were allegedly explicitly forbidden by the Ministry of Justice (under Demmink’s alleged influence) from filing official reports. Police dossiers from as early as March 1973 are chillingly mentioned in connection with the alleged cover-up. The brutal reality was that the police allegedly had the same attitude of refusal, stating to Hans, “You’re not allowed to press any charges”. Head of Police Peter Slot in Leeuwarden allegedly held back data in 2000. Detective Bolier allegedly refused to investigate.
The Public Prosecution Service (OM):
The Public Prosecution Service (OM) is accused of brutally obstructing justice and failing to act on Smedema’s horrifying complaints. Managing prosecutors were allegedly stopped from investigating and even terrifyingly forced to relocate. Ruud Rosingh, a managing prosecutor, was allegedly forced to relocate after starting an investigation into the alleged rape of Smedema’s wife, purportedly occurring on January 12, 1991. Alleged orders were given to chillingly halt rape investigations.
The Judiciary:
The Judiciary is accused of bias, corruption, and dismissing Smedema’s claims without proper due process, allegedly favoring the prosecution’s narrative. This allegedly compromises the crucial requirement for independent courts. Judge Jeroen van Bruggen, who dismissed Hans’s first court case in 2009, is labeled as corrupt by Smedema. Even judges in domestic proceedings allegedly dismissed complaints without proper investigation and potentially cooperated with a cover-up, with one police judge allegedly presiding over a case without you having a lawyer.
The Intelligence Service (AIVD – previously BVD):
The Intelligence Service (AIVD – previously BVD) is accused of monitoring Smedema, suppressing vital evidence, and prioritizing the protection of the Dutch Royal Family over the pursuit of horrifying truth. Smedema alleges Demmink abused his authority as a BVD trainee in 1972 to manipulate and block investigations. The AIVD is also mentioned as potentially being part of the alleged Omerta network and being influenced or manipulated. The “Frankfurt Dossier,” a purported 30+ page Dutch intelligence file, allegedly discovered at the 97th General Army Hospital in Frankfurt, Germany, in 1983 during business dealings, allegedly contained incriminating information about the conspiracy and even the Royal Family’s alleged involvement. Its alleged mysterious erasure within three days of discovery is presented as a deliberate, desperate act to conceal crucial evidence. This file has become central to Smedema’s claims of suppressed evidence.
The Cabinet / Government:
The Dutch Government/Cabinet is accused of orchestrating a vast conspiracy, obstruction of justice, and violating international human rights conventions. Disturbingly, a Cabinet MP, Balkenende, is alleged to have offered 5 million euros in 2003 and 2004 to keep the alleged criminal acts hidden. Ministers like Donner, Hirsch Ballin, Opstelten, and van Weel are also mentioned in the context of their alleged handling of the case. Parliament allegedly failed in its legislative and controlling tasks and is thus co-responsible. Members of Parliament were allegedly warned about the “gruwelijke misstand” of the Smedema affair but allegedly remained silent and refused to act. The Dutch government is accused of misusing a bilateral judicial treaty with the US.
The Royal Family:
The Dutch Royal Family is consistently and chillingly implicated at the highest level throughout the narrative, accused of being complicit in the conspiracy and obstruction of justice. Smedema alleges the “Royal Special Decree” initiated by Queen Juliana around 1972/73 and allegedly upheld by subsequent monarchs, including Queen Beatrix and King Willem-Alexander, is central to shielding perpetrators from prosecution, effectively granting them horrifying immunity and placing them allegedly above the law. This alleged decree is cited as enabling Demmink’s alleged impunity. The Royal House allegedly withheld crucial facts in Al Rust’s US court case in 1987. Royal involvement allegedly prevented politicians from asking questions. “The Crown” allegedly refused to act on the CTIVD recommendation. The Ombudsman declined due to alleged Royal involvement. Queen Beatrix is mentioned as potentially approving the abuse of power. King Willem-Alexander is allegedly implicated in upholding the conspiracy and potentially interfering with Smedema’s asylum attempts, including a chilling alleged incident in 2017 where the King, acting as a co-pilot on a KLM flight, allegedly prevented Smedema’s asylum process over American airspace. This alleged high-level political determination to continue the “gruwelijke doofpot” ensures that any attempt to gain traction is met with resistance designed to maintain the “untouchable” status.
The Medical Profession:
The Medical Profession allegedly participated in this horrifying conspiracy by misdiagnosing Smedema, administering drugs without his consent, engaging in horrifying psychological manipulation, and being involved in setting up the cover-up. Specific individuals chillingly named include psychologist prof. dr. Onno van der Hart, psychiatrist Van den Bosch, and arbeidsongeschiktheidsarts Dirk Snieders. Professor Dr. Onno van der Hart is particularly accused of conditioning Hans Smedema and participating in his alleged torture and brainwashing, including criminal electroshock torture, to discredit him and suppress his terrifying memories. They allegedly refused proper treatment and purposely tried to hide what happened.
Landsadvocaat (State Advocate):
While described as correctly forwarding a request, the office is presented as being in a “Paradoxical Dilemma” because they were allegedly fed false and manipulated information by Demmink.
Political Parties:
Political Parties (CDA, VVD) are alleged to have helped set up the initial conspiracy and cover-up. The VVD is mentioned in relation to Demmink’s membership and allegations of a “homo- and pedo-culture” involving prominent members.
Family Members:
In a truly horrifying turn, Smedema’s own family members are tragically accused of initiating and participating in the conspiracy. His brother, Mr. Johan Smedema, is repeatedly accused of setting up the conspiracy with their brother-in-law Tjitte de Jong with help from the CDA, allegedly leading the family “mafia” and Omerta criminal organization, having direct contact with Demmink, and even buying off Hans’s friends. His wife and children are accused of forging crucial DNA paternity tests in 2003.
The ultimate chilling shield of impunity
Underpinning these alleged actions, providing the ultimate chilling shield of impunity, is the horrifying claim of an alleged “Royal Special Decree.” Purportedly issued by Queen Juliana around 1972/73 and allegedly upheld by subsequent monarchs, including Queen Beatrix and King Willem-Alexander, this alleged decree is presented by Smedema as the ultimate tool shielding perpetrators involved in crimes against him and his wife from prosecution. It allegedly grants them horrifying immunity and places them terrifyingly above the law. If proven to exist, such a decree would represent a fundamental, terrifying breakdown of the rule of law, raising profound, terrifying questions about the monarchy’s role in allegedly obstructing justice.
The cumulative effect of these alleged failures and active obstructions by institutions and professionals creates a horrifying climate of fear and impunity. The devastating collateral damage inflicted upon those who dared to investigate, help, or were also victims—from alleged murder and wrongful imprisonment to professional ruin, psychological trauma, and complete denial of support—vividly illustrates the alleged power and ruthlessness of the accused “untouchable” figures and the system allegedly protecting them. It is a chilling narrative of a system allegedly captured, where justice is denied, and those seeking it face ruin and despair.
Devastating collateral damage
The devastating collateral damage described in this horrifying narrative is immense and devastating. People who attempted to investigate or help Smedema have allegedly suffered, such as Al Rust’s purported wrongful dismissal. Al Rust, an American CIA agent and friend, allegedly faced wrongful dismissal in 1987 after assisting Smedema. He reportedly won his settlement only after obtaining the “Frankfurt Dossier”. His case provides alleged independent corroboration of Smedema’s claims and highlights the alleged conspiracy’s willingness to target individuals beyond Dutch borders. Ruud Rosingh, a managing prosecutor, allegedly initiated an investigation into the alleged rape of Smedema’s wife but was supposedly forced to relocate by the Ministry of Justice when he refused to halt the investigation. His experience highlights the acute dangers faced by those within the system who try to pursue justice. Haye Bruinsma, a police detective, was allegedly explicitly forbidden by the Ministry of Justice from filing an official report regarding Smedema’s horrifying allegations. This further underscores the chilling effect on law enforcement professionals. Smedema’s own nephew, Jack Smedema, a Rijkspolitie officer, allegedly lost his position around 1990 after trying to bring his uncle’s allegations to the authorities.
This chilling outcome allegedly solidified Smedema’s belief that the alleged conspirators would go to any length to silence dissent.
These accounts of collateral damage vividly illustrate the alleged power and ruthlessness of the forces Smedema claims are arrayed against him, reinforcing his chilling assertion that individuals like Joris Demmink and Jaap Duijs, allegedly orchestrating the cover-up and protecting each other, operate with horrifying impunity, tragically “untouchable”. The pervasive climate of alleged fear and obstruction, detailed meticulously in the sources, makes the struggle to present a case that international bodies will accept horrifyingly difficult. This chilling environment further ensures that gathering the necessary information or finding assistance to build a legally “coherent” international case, linking the obstruction to EU law, is made agonizingly difficult, thereby perpetuating the cycle of procedural denial.
Systematic obstruction of justice, and the devastating collateral damage
In essence, the personal accounts of horrifying abuse, the alleged systematic obstruction of justice, and the devastating collateral damage are deeply interconnected in the sources. They collectively paint a horrifying panorama of a Dutch justice system allegedly twisted and corrupted, where the pursuit of truth and accountability becomes a desperate, often brutal, ordeal for those who dare to seek it. The alleged systemic corruption and obstruction of justice act as a chillingly effective barrier to the pursuit of truth and accountability, leaving claims tragically unverified and justice brutally denied. This horrifying landscape, where justice is allegedly manipulated and powerful individuals are allegedly shielded by impunity, transforms the noble concept of the rule of law into a chilling narrative of betrayal and systemic failure.
However, it is crucial to remember that the sources are primarily from the victim’s perspective and often lack independent verification within the provided documents. The Dutch government has consistently denied these accusations. Nevertheless, the sheer volume, consistency, and horrifying detail of these allegations, coupled with the alleged systematic refusal of any meaningful investigation (which Smedema argues is evidence of the cover-up), raise profoundly troubling questions about the functioning and accountability of the Dutch justice and governmental systems that, according to the sources, warrant serious examination.
Google NotebookLM Plus Insights,
See also:
based on the legal-written-statements on this Blog and e-books by victim Author:
Hans Smedema B. Sc., in forced exile since 2008 surviving in beautiful El Albir, Costa Blanca, Spain
