Last Updated 30/04/2025 published 30/04/2025 by Hans Smedema

Detailed Allegations of Dutch State Conspiracy and Abuse

Main text systemic corruption and brutal abuse

Prepare yourself for a descent into a horrifying abyss, a chilling narrative of alleged systemic corruption and brutal abuse that, if true, reveals the terrifying extent to which power can be perverted, leaving justice shattered and lives devastated. This is the horrifying panorama painted by Hans Smedema’s allegations, a saga of a “Perfect’ 40+ year (Royal) Crime!” that allegedly reaches into the very heart of the Dutch state, challenging the foundational principles of the Rule of Law itself. At the terrifying core of this alleged conspiracy lie figures described as “untouchable,” specifically Joris Demmink, a former Secretary-General of the Ministry of Justice, and Jaap Duijs, allegedly shielded by a system meticulously designed to place the elite above the horrifying consequences of their actions.

A nightmare woven into the fabric of the Dutch state

The alleged conspiracy, a nightmare woven into the fabric of the Dutch state, did not appear from nowhere. According to Smedema, it originated in 1972, following horrifying acts of abuse. He claims his wife, Wies Smedema-Jansma, was repeatedly drugged and raped, primarily by Jan van Beek, during this period. Adding to the initial horror, Smedema alleges that he was subjected to forced sterilization in the same timeframe. These initial, devastating acts are presented as the terrifying catalyst that allegedly triggered decades of cover-up and relentless persecution. Later, from 1978 to 2008, Jaap Duijs stands accused of repeatedly abusing Wies Smedema, allegedly controlling her through “mind control,” further entrenching the need for concealment and forming a horrifying part of the alleged ongoing abuse.

Orchestrating this nightmare are central figures

Allegedly orchestrating this nightmare are central figures who stand accused of wielding immense, terrifying power. Joris Demmink, the former Secretary-General of the Dutch Ministry of Justice, is consistently identified as the alleged mastermind behind the entire, sprawling conspiracy. Smedema alleges that Demmink was involved in the initial abuse of Wies in 1972, an alleged act that purportedly triggered the decades-long cover-up specifically to protect him and other alleged perpetrators. Demmink is accused of using his immense power and high position within the Ministry to orchestrate the cover-up, brutally obstruct justice, silence witnesses, and organize terrifying attacks against Smedema, allegedly ensuring his isolation and preventing him from exposing the horrifying truth. He is alleged to have been instrumental in convincing the government that investigating Smedema’s claims would threaten national security, thereby invoking “State Security” as a chilling shield. Smedema alleges Demmink, as the alleged “rapist-traitor” from 1972, chillingly exploited the situation to secure a position of power within the Dutch Ministry of Justice, ultimately rising to the rank of Secretary-General. He further claims Demmink allegedly orchestrated the cover-up from the very beginning. Jaap Duijs is portrayed as Demmink’s alleged operative, a key figure in the alleged ongoing abuse and manipulation. The sources hauntingly suggest that if Smedema’s horrifying allegations were proven, individuals like Demmink and Duijs could face criminal charges.

The horrifying panorama of alleged corruption

The horrifying panorama of alleged corruption extends tragically beyond these central figures and the Ministry of Justice itself, involving a chilling web of other institutions and individuals allegedly corrupted or exploited by the alleged conspiracy. The Ministry of Justice is repeatedly described as being a central player in orchestrating the cover-up and protecting perpetrators, particularly Demmink, from the horrifying consequences of their alleged actions.

Numerous key Dutch institutions are allegedly deeply complicit in this horrifying conspiracy and obstruction of justice:

•
The Dutch Government/Cabinet: Accused of orchestrating a vast conspiracy, obstruction of justice, and violating international human rights conventions. Disturbingly, a Cabinet MP Balkenende is alleged to have offered 5 million euros in 2003 and 2004 to keep the alleged criminal acts hidden. Ministers like Donner, Hirsch Ballin, Opstelten, and van Weel are also mentioned in the context of their alleged handling of the case.
•
The Police: Accused of refusing to investigate Smedema’s horrifying claims, ignoring crucial evidence, participating in persecution, and being explicitly forbidden by the Ministry of Justice (under Demmink’s alleged influence) from filing official reports. Police dossiers from as early as March 1973 are chillingly mentioned in connection with the alleged cover-up. Police detective Haye Bruinsma was allegedly forbidden from filing a report. Smedema’s own nephew, Jack Smedema, a Rijkspolitie officer, allegedly lost his position around 1990 after attempting to bring his uncle’s allegations to the authorities.
•
The Public Prosecution Service (OM): Accused of brutally obstructing justice and failing to act on Smedema’s horrifying complaints. Managing prosecutors were allegedly stopped from investigating and even terrifyingly forced to relocate. Ruud Rosingh, a managing prosecutor, was allegedly forced to relocate after starting an investigation into the alleged rape of Smedema’s wife, purportedly occurring on January 12, 1991, in Leeuwarden.
•
The Judiciary: Accused of bias, corruption, and dismissing Smedema’s claims without proper due process, allegedly favoring the prosecution’s narrative. This allegedly compromises the crucial requirement for independent courts.
•
The Intelligence Service (AIVD – previously BVD): Accused of monitoring Smedema, suppressing vital evidence, and prioritizing the protection of the Dutch Royal Family over the pursuit of horrifying truth. Smedema alleges Demmink abused his authority as a BVD trainee in 1972 to manipulate and block investigations. The AIVD is also mentioned as potentially being part of the alleged Omerta network and being influenced or manipulated. The “Frankfurt Dossier,” a purported intelligence file allegedly containing incriminating information about the conspiracy and the Royal Family’s involvement, is alleged to have mysteriously disappeared, becoming central to Smedema’s claims of suppressed evidence.
•
The Medical Profession: Allegedly participated in the conspiracy by misdiagnosing Smedema, administering drugs without his consent, engaging in horrifying psychological manipulation, and being involved in setting up the cover-up. Allegations include using medical professionals to manipulate Smedema’s wife and discredit Smedema as “delusional”. Specific individuals chillingly named include psychologist prof. dr. Onno van der Hart, psychiatrist Van den Bosch, and arbeidsongeschiktheidsarts Dirk Snieders. Professor Dr. Onno van der Hart is particularly accused of conditioning Hans Smedema and participating in his alleged torture and brainwashing, including criminal electroshock torture, to discredit him and suppress his terrifying memories.
•
The Landsadvocaat (State Advocate): While described as correctly forwarding a request, the office is presented as being in a “Paradoxical Dilemma” because they were allegedly fed false and manipulated information by Demmink.
•
Political Parties: The CDA is alleged to have helped set up the initial conspiracy and cover-up. The VVD is mentioned in relation to Demmink’s membership and allegations of a “homo- and pedo-culture” involving prominent members.
•
Family Members: In a truly horrifying turn, Smedema’s own family members are tragically accused of initiating and participating in the conspiracy. His brother, Mr. Johan Smedema, is repeatedly accused of setting up the conspiracy with their brother-in-law Tjitte de Jong with help from the CDA, allegedly leading the family “mafia” and Omerta criminal organization, having direct contact with Demmink, and even buying off Hans’s friends. His wife and children are accused of forging crucial DNA paternity tests in 2003.
•
The Dutch Royal Family: Consistently implicated at the highest level throughout the narrative. Smedema alleges the “Royal Special Decree” initiated by Queen Juliana around 1972/73 and allegedly upheld by subsequent monarchs, including Queen Beatrix and King Willem-Alexander, is central to shielding perpetrators from prosecution, effectively granting them horrifying immunity and placing them allegedly above the law. Alleged connections and protection from the Royal House are cited as enabling Demmink’s alleged impunity. Queen Beatrix is mentioned as potentially approving the abuse of power. King Willem-Alexander is allegedly implicated in upholding the conspiracy and potentially interfering with Smedema’s asylum attempts, including a chilling alleged incident in 2017 where the King, acting as a co-pilot on a KLM flight, allegedly prevented Smedema’s asylum process over American airspace.

Royal Special Decree

Underpinning these alleged actions, providing the ultimate chilling shield of impunity, is the horrifying claim of an alleged “Royal Special Decree.” Purportedly issued by Queen Juliana around 1972/73 and allegedly upheld by subsequent monarchs, including Queen Beatrix and King Willem-Alexander, this alleged decree is presented by Smedema as the ultimate tool shielding perpetrators involved in crimes against him and his wife from prosecution. It allegedly grants them horrifying immunity and places them terrifyingly above the law. If proven to exist, such a decree would represent a fundamental, terrifying breakdown of the rule of law, raising profound, terrifying questions about the monarchy’s role in allegedly obstructing justice. This alleged culture of impunity, where powerful figures are seemingly shielded from consequences, is described as perhaps the most damning challenge to the Dutch justice system’s integrity.

horrifying psychological and physical abuse

The horrifying psychological and physical abuse Smedema alleges is woven throughout the narrative, starting with the initial rapes and forced sterilization. He also describes terrifying medical interventions allegedly used against him and his wife, including drugging, psychological manipulation, torture, brainwashing, and criminal electroshock torture, allegedly orchestrated with the complicity of the medical profession. The devastating impact on Smedema and his wife is described in chilling terms: unimaginable psychological trauma, financial ruin, cognitive impairment resulting from the alleged abuse, and forced exile, effectively being made “De Facto Stateless” by the alleged conspiracy. Their lives have allegedly been ruined, turned into a “living hell”.

Involving international obstruction of justice

The alleged reach of this conspiracy extends terrifyingly beyond the borders of the Netherlands, involving international obstruction of justice. Smedema claims the Dutch government actively interfered with his attempts to seek justice abroad, including interfering with his asylum applications in the US, Canada, and Mexico. He alleges they misused a bilateral judicial treaty with the US, designed for legal cooperation, to prevent him from gaining asylum, believing this treaty was exploited to shield the Dutch Crown and government from scrutiny. He also alleges the Dutch government provided false information to the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) in 2005/2006, leading to the rejection of his complaint. Disturbingly, Smedema contends that US investigations, purportedly by the FBI and CIA during his asylum attempts, actually validated aspects of his claims and even uncovered evidence of Dutch obstruction, with Dutch officials allegedly lying to American authorities, withholding crucial information, and manipulating evidence. He alleges that President Obama even filed a UN complaint, and America started an UNCAT or special procedure in 2017, though a UNCAT investigation has allegedly been prevented by the Dutch government’s obstruction and invocation of “State Security”. The alleged misleading of US authorities by the Dutch Ministry of Justice is even linked to the alleged wrongful dismissal of Al Rust from Military Intelligence, who was assisting Smedema, showcasing the conspiracy’s alleged malicious intent and horrifying reach beyond Dutch borders.

The collateral damage

The collateral damage inflicted by this alleged systemic corruption is immense and devastating, extending tragically beyond the direct victims like Hans Smedema to those who dared to investigate or assist. These individuals allegedly faced severe repercussions for simply trying to uncover the truth or provide help, vividly illustrating the alleged power and ruthlessness of the forces Smedema claims are arrayed against him.
•
Al Rust: An American CIA agent and friend, allegedly faced wrongful dismissal in 1987 after assisting Smedema. He reportedly won his settlement only after obtaining the “Frankfurt Dossier”. His case provides alleged independent corroboration of Smedema’s claims and highlights the alleged conspiracy’s willingness to target individuals beyond Dutch borders.
•
Ruud Rosingh: A managing prosecutor, allegedly initiated an investigation into the alleged rape of Smedema’s wife but was supposedly forced to relocate by the Ministry of Justice when he refused to halt the investigation. His experience highlights the acute dangers faced by those within the system who try to pursue justice.
•
Haye Bruinsma: A police detective, was allegedly explicitly forbidden by the Ministry of Justice from filing an official report regarding Smedema’s horrifying allegations. This further underscores the chilling effect on law enforcement professionals.
•
Jack ?: Smedema’s own nephew, a Rijkspolitie officer, allegedly lost his position around 1990 after trying to bring his uncle’s allegations to the authorities. This chilling outcome allegedly solidified Smedema’s belief that the alleged conspirators would go to any length to silence dissent.
•
Legal and Support Community: Smedema’s repeated claims of being denied legal representation since 2000 also suggest a terrifying chilling effect on the legal community itself, with lawyers allegedly intimidated or instructed not to take his case. He claims all Dutch victim support organizations were secretly instructed to deny him help, making his pursuit of justice a solitary, agonizing battle.
•
International Officials: Smedema alleges that hundreds of officials internationally have been put in dangerous ethical dilemmas as a result of this alleged conspiracy.

These accounts of collateral damage vividly illustrate the alleged power and ruthlessness of the forces Smedema claims are arrayed against him, reinforcing his chilling assertion that individuals like Joris Demmink and Jaap Duijs, allegedly orchestrating the cover-up and protecting each other, operate with horrifying impunity, tragically “untouchable”.

This alleged systemic corruption and obstruction of justice fundamentally dismantles the Rule of Law, a cornerstone value upon which the entire European Union is founded. This isn’t abstract legal theory; it is a horrifying reality where:

•
Legality and the Prohibition of Arbitrariness are Violated: Decisions regarding investigations, prosecutions, and even access to legal aid are allegedly driven by illicit considerations rather than legal merits, involving public powers acting outside the constraints of the law and arbitrarily. Smedema’s allegations of denied reports, dismissed court cases due to fabricated evidence, and denied legal representation illustrate this.
•
Judicial Independence and Impartiality are Attacked: A corrupt Ministry of Justice allegedly has the horrifying capacity to directly interfere with the judiciary, through manipulating appointments, misusing disciplinary proceedings, interfering with case assignment, or pressuring judges and prosecutors.
•
Effective Judicial Review and Protection are Negated: Obstruction of justice directly prevents the system from functioning. If investigations are blocked, evidence tampered with, or court decisions ignored, the capacity for effective judicial review and fundamental protection of citizens’ rights is nullified. Access to justice becomes a terrifying illusion.
•
Equality Before the Law is Destroyed: Corruption allegedly creates a system where access to justice or impunity depends not on legal rights but on illicit connections or influence, shattering the principle that all are equal before the law.
The alleged systemic failures, as described in the sources, are presented as direct violations of fundamental EU legal principles and rights:
•
Rule of Law (Article 2 TEU): The alleged abuse of power, obstruction, use of decrees, and inequality fundamentally contradict legality, legal certainty, judicial control, and equality.
•
Effective Judicial Protection (Article 19 TEU): The alleged state failure to ensure independent judicial systems, allowing Ministry of Justice interference (blocking investigations, denying legal aid, compromising independence), breaches this obligation.
•
Right to an Effective Remedy and a Fair Trial (Article 47 CFR, Article 6 ECHR): Systemic Ministry of Justice interference, manipulation (e.g., alleged ECHR process manipulation), and obstruction allegedly deny citizens access to an independent tribunal and effective remedy.
•
EU Anti-Corruption Principles: The alleged conduct (abuse of function, obstruction of justice, cover-up network) aligns with offenses targeted by EU standards.
•
Protection of the EU’s Financial Interests (PIF Directive, Article 325 TFEU): Ministry of Justice obstruction and a compromised judiciary allegedly prevent effective investigation and prosecution of potential corruption/fraud affecting EU interests.
•
Principle of Mutual Trust: The allegedly compromised justice system erodes the indispensable mutual trust necessary for judicial cooperation within the EU’s Area of Freedom, Security and Justice.

These alleged systemic failures are presented as potentially triggering EU Rule of Law enforcement mechanisms, such as infringement actions, the politically charged Article 7 TEU procedure, or the Rule of Law Conditionality Regulation, which can freeze EU funds for Member States with systemic rule of law deficiencies impacting the EU budget.

The potential political ramifications suggested by these allegations within the Netherlands are immense and deeply troubling. If Smedema’s claims were ever substantiated, they could trigger widespread outrage and fundamentally erode public trust in the very foundations of the Dutch government and legal system. His narrative, alleging a deeply rooted conspiracy prioritizing protection of the elite, including the Royal Family, over justice and individual rights, could lead to a significant loss of public trust, sparking public outrage and calls for investigations and reforms. The perceived manipulation of legal procedures, suppression of evidence, and alleged intimidation would suggest a terrifying culture of impunity. The alleged existence of the “Royal Special Decree,” if proven, would raise profound questions about the rule of law, suggesting a system where powerful figures allegedly operate above legal scrutiny. This could lead to political turmoil, potentially leading to resignations, early elections, and calls for constitutional reforms to address the alleged systemic issues and reassess the monarchy’s power and accountability. The alleged tactics to silence Smedema could also create a chilling effect on dissent within Dutch society.

The potential international consequences are equally severe. If these claims were substantiated, they could significantly damage the Netherlands’ international reputation as a champion of human rights and the rule of law. This could lead to diplomatic tensions with allies like the US, economic consequences, and diminished influence on the global stage, as other countries might hesitate to cooperate with a government perceived as corrupt and untrustworthy. The alleged misuse of international agreements and institutions for obstructive purposes further adds to these concerns.

Conclusion

In conclusion, Hans Smedema’s allegations depict a horrifying, sprawling conspiracy allegedly rooted in brutal abuse and reaching into the highest echelons of the Dutch state, involving numerous institutions and individuals allegedly corrupted or exploited over decades. At its terrifying heart lies the alleged “untouchability” of figures like Joris Demmink and Jaap Duijs, allegedly shielded by state mechanisms, including a purported “Royal Special Decree”. This alleged conspiracy has not only subjected Smedema and his wife to horrifying psychological and physical abuse and ruined their lives but has also allegedly inflicted devastating collateral damage on those who dared to investigate or help, crushing careers and instilling a chilling fear in the legal and official community.

The extent of the alleged conspiracy is depicted as reaching internationally, involving the manipulation of foreign legal systems and international treaties. This horrifying narrative, if true, fundamentally undermines the Rule of Law in the Netherlands, violating principles of legality, judicial independence, effective judicial protection, and equality before the law. It also has grave potential legal and political ramifications, threatening public trust, political stability, and the Netherlands’ international standing, while potentially exposing the state to EU enforcement actions. It remains crucial to reiterate, as the sources themselves state, that these are primarily Smedema’s allegations, consistently denied by the Dutch government, and lacking independent verification within the provided excerpts. Nevertheless, the detailed and persistent nature of these claims raises deeply troubling questions about the functioning of the Dutch justice system that, according to the sources, warrant serious examination.

Google NotebookLM Plus Insights,

based on the legal-written-statements on this Blog and e-books by victim Author:

Hans Smedema B. Sc., in forced exile since 2008 surviving in beautiful ‘El Albir’, Costa Blanca, Spain