Last Updated 22/04/2025 published 22/04/2025 by Hans Smedema

Smedema’s Corroborating Claims of Dutch Government Conspiracy and Cover-Up

Drawing upon the extensive information presented across the provided sources, it is crucial to acknowledge from the outset that the vast majority of the narrative surrounding a long-term conspiracy and cover-up by the Dutch government stems directly from the persistent and detailed allegations of Hans Smedema. The sources repeatedly emphasize that these are primarily Smedema’s claims, often lacking independent verification within the provided materials, and consistently denied by the Dutch government.

Elements that are corroborating his claims

However, within the numerous documents detailing Smedema’s perspective, there are mentions of elements that he interprets as corroborating his claims, or instances that allude to potential issues within the Dutch system. It is important to analyze these carefully, distinguishing between Smedema’s interpretation and actual independent corroboration found within these sources.

Involvement and findings of American authorities

One key element frequently cited by Smedema as corroboration is the alleged involvement and findings of American authorities during his attempts to seek asylum in the United States. Smedema claims that the CIA and the FBI investigated his allegations and found evidence to support them. He believes these alleged American investigations validated aspects of his claims, contrasting with the Dutch government’s dismissal of his narrative as delusional. Smedema even suggests that the FBI uncovered evidence of the Dutch government’s attempts to obstruct justice and conceal the alleged conspiracy by lying to American authorities and withholding crucial information. While Smedema presents this as external validation, the provided sources do not contain independent documentation or official statements from U.S. authorities confirming these investigations or their alleged findings. Thus, this remains within the realm of Smedema’s interpretation and allegations about external validation.

The “Frankfurt Dossier”

Another recurring element is the mention of the “Frankfurt Dossier,” a purported intelligence file that Smedema claims contained incriminating information about his wife’s alleged abuse, his medical records, evidence of a cover-up by high-ranking officials, and a secret ruling by Queen Juliana. Smedema alleges that this dossier mysteriously disappeared shortly after its alleged discovery in 1983, which he interprets as a clear act of evidence suppression by the Dutch government. The existence and content of this dossier are central to Smedema’s claims, but the provided sources do not offer any independent confirmation of its existence or its alleged disappearance due to government action. It remains a key component of Smedema’s narrative of a cover-up.

The case of Al Rust

The sources also mention the case of Al Rust, who allegedly faced wrongful dismissal after assisting Smedema. Smedema interprets this as evidence of the Dutch government’s efforts to punish anyone who attempts to uncover the truth. He claims that the Dutch Ministry of Justice denied any knowledge of his case to Al Rust in 1987, leading to Rust’s dismissal from Military Intelligence. While this suggests potential repercussions for those who might have assisted Smedema, the direct link to a high-level, long-term conspiracy and cover-up orchestrated by the government remains Smedema’s interpretation within these sources.

The Fred Spijkers Case

Furthermore, Smedema draws parallels between his case and that of Fred Spijkers, a whistleblower who, according to Smedema, was destroyed by the Dutch state after reporting a cover-up within the Ministry of Defense. The sources note an academic study concluding that Spijkers’ life was “devastated by the actions of political, administrative, judicial, and official authorities on behalf of the Dutch state”. Smedema uses the Spijkers case to argue a pattern of the Dutch government mistreating individuals who challenge the system. While this highlights potential issues with how the Dutch state treats whistleblowers, it does not independently corroborate Smedema’s specific allegations of a vast conspiracy against him.

Professor Wagenaar’s criticism

Professor Wagenaar’s criticism of the Dutch justice system is mentioned as potentially supporting Smedema’s assertions of systemic issues. However, the specifics of Wagenaar’s critique and how they directly corroborate Smedema’s detailed claims of a decades-long conspiracy involving the Royal Family and high-ranking officials are not elaborated upon in the provided excerpts.

CTIVD (Committee for Supervision on the Intelligence and Security Services)

In one instance, the sources mention the CTIVD (Committee for Supervision on the Intelligence and Security Services) confirming a cover-up in 2008 but ultimately refusing to stop it due to a “political decision”. Smedema interprets this as evidence of the ongoing conspiracy. However, the details of this confirmed cover-up, its scope, and its direct link to Smedema’s specific allegations require further context beyond what is provided in the excerpts.

Denied legal representation

Additionally, Smedema’s persistent claims of being denied legal representation both within the Netherlands and internationally are highlighted. He believes this systematic denial is a deliberate tactic to isolate him and prevent any thorough investigation into his claims. While the difficulty Smedema reportedly faced in securing legal counsel could suggest potential obstacles in pursuing his case, the direct cause being a high-level government conspiracy remains Smedema’s assertion.

The sheer volume and consistent detail

Finally, the sheer volume and consistent detail of Hans Smedema’s allegations across numerous documents are noted. While not independent verification, the persistent and detailed nature of these claims are stated to raise significant and troubling questions regarding the functioning of the Dutch legal and governmental systems in this specific and protracted case.
In conclusion, while Hans Smedema presents a narrative that includes alleged external validation and points to systemic issues within the Dutch system, the provided sources contain very limited independent corroboration of his central claim of a long-term conspiracy and cover-up orchestrated by the Dutch government and Royal Family. The information beyond Smedema’s personal accounts primarily consists of his interpretations of events and alleged findings of other entities, which lack independent confirmation within these sources. The consistent denial by the Dutch government further underscores the contested nature of these allegations.

Google NotebookLM Plus Insights,

based on the 600+ ‘legal-written-statements of criminal acts’ on this Blog and Ebooks by the victim Author:

Hans Smedema B. Sc. in forced exile surviving in beautiful ‘El Albir’, Costa Blanca, Spain