Last Updated 12/02/2025 published 01/01/2025 by Hans Smedema
Page Content
Smedema’s Alleged Mind Control and Personality Alteration
Main text
The sources detail a chilling account of the alleged systematic manipulation and personality alteration Smedema claims to have endured, transforming him from a high-functioning individual with an IQ of 135 into a submissive, almost “doglike” state, acting against his own interests. This alleged transformation, according to Smedema, was achieved through a combination of psychological manipulation, enforced amnesia, and the strategic use of drugs, all orchestrated by what he calls the “Omerta,” a network of individuals within the Dutch government, police, and even his own family.
The sources, which are Smedema’s personal accounts, detail how this alleged transformation served the interests of the alleged conspirators by rendering him incapable of effectively resisting their control or exposing their alleged crimes. Smedema’s compliance, according to his accounts, was crucial for maintaining the alleged cover-up and ensuring his continued silence. This alleged transformation is central to Smedema’s claims and highlights the profound psychological impact he believes the alleged conspiracy had on him.
Here’s a breakdown of the key elements detailed in the sources related to Smedema’s alleged personality change:
1. Mind Control and Torture:
Smedema repeatedly accuses Prof. Dr. Onno van der Hart of employing mind control techniques, including alleged electroshock torture, to enforce his submission and induce amnesia. These alleged interventions, possibly involving drugs like ketamine, allegedly served to repress memories of alleged abuse, particularly concerning his wife’s alleged sexual exploitation, and to make him docile and compliant [1-11]. Smedema describes himself as acting like a “dog” following orders without critical thought [4, 5, 12-15], claiming this manipulation rendered him defenseless against further exploitation and hindered his ability to expose the alleged crimes [1, 4, 8, 12, 13, 16-18]. He details an incident where he was lured to a retired police officer’s villa under the guise of a dinner, only to be subjected to alleged electroshock torture by van der Hart [2, 16, 19]. The retired officer, Ad, allegedly intervened, perceiving the treatment as torture rather than “conditioning” [2]. This alleged manipulation, if true, represents a calculated effort to break down Smedema’s resistance, leaving him psychologically scarred and unable to effectively fight back.
2. Drugging and Its Impact:
Smedema claims long-term drugging, possibly with ketamine, played a crucial role in his alleged personality change. He accuses his wife and Jaap Duijs, his alleged appointed guardian and a central figure in the alleged conspiracy, of administering the drug under the direction of individuals within the Dutch government [1, 7, 20]. This alleged drugging, allegedly starting in 1973, served to weaken him physically and mentally, making him more susceptible to manipulation and less likely to challenge authority [1, 5, 7, 17, 20-23]. He describes the drug’s effect as making him “doglike” and obedient, impairing his cognitive function and decision-making, and lowering his IQ from 135 to an estimated 90-100 [4, 5, 17, 20-22, 24, 25]. Smedema recounts an incident where he was allegedly drugged by a couple, Andre Gruters and Joke Laven, and then mocked for his resulting submissive behavior [5]. This alleged manipulation, if true, highlights the lengths to which the alleged conspirators were willing to go to control Smedema’s behavior and maintain his dependence on them.
3. Sabotaging Relationships and Isolation:
Smedema believes the alleged mind control extended to undermining his relationships and isolating him from potential sources of support [1, 15, 21, 26, 27]. He cites instances where he inexplicably rejected romantic opportunities or pushed away individuals who might have helped him, attributing this behavior to the alleged manipulation [1, 28-30]. He recounts specific examples, such as canceling his decades-long legal aid insurance just weeks before needing it, a decision he now attributes to the alleged mind control [20, 27, 28]. He alleges that Jaap Duijs, his appointed guardian, played a key role in this sabotage, using mind control techniques and manipulating situations to ensure Smedema remained isolated and dependent on him [27, 28, 31-34]. This enforced isolation, if true, served to further weaken Smedema’s ability to resist control or seek help, effectively trapping him within the alleged conspirators’ web.
4. Canceling Legal Aid Insurance:
Smedema points to the cancellation of his legal aid insurance as a prime example of acting against his own well-being due to the alleged manipulation [35]. He recounts that he made this decision based on a manipulated conversation with his wife’s sister, Klazien, whom Smedema alleges was part of the conspiracy. He believes he was under the influence of the drug Semap at the time, further impairing his judgment and making him more susceptible to their suggestions [35]. This incident demonstrates the alleged effectiveness of the alleged conspirators’ methods in manipulating Smedema into making decisions detrimental to his own interests, especially in his pursuit of justice.
Smedema’s account portrays a systematic and calculated effort to break down his personality, rendering him a pawn in the alleged conspirators’ game. The alleged methods, ranging from physical torture and drugging to psychological manipulation and social isolation, were, according to him, meticulously planned and executed over decades, leaving him psychologically scarred and unable to effectively fight back.
Google NotebookLM Insights,
based on the true-crime chronologically in 24 horrifying years ‘legal written statements’ with slowly increasing insights in the complex unbelievable conspiracy on this Blog and eBooks by Victim-Author:
Hans Smedema B. Sc., in forced exile surviving in beautiful El Albir, Costa Blanca, Spain