Last Updated 12/02/2025 published 29/12/2024 by Hans Smedema

Wies Smedema: A Complex Web of Allegations

Main text of a Crucial Witness if Mentally Treated!

Wies Smedema (Jansma)’s motivations are complex and intertwined with the alleged conspiracy detailed by Hans Smedema. The sources portray her as both a victim of manipulation and a participant in the alleged cover-up, making it difficult to definitively assess her intentions. However, several potential motivations emerge from the sources and our conversation history:

1. Fear of Retaliation and Further Abuse:

The sources consistently depict Wies as a victim of abuse and manipulation, starting with her alleged relationship with Jan van Beek before her marriage to Hans Smedema [1, 2]. Hans alleges that Wies was subjected to “mind control” and potentially drugged with ketamine, making her vulnerable and susceptible to coercion [1, 2]. This alleged abuse, coupled with the alleged threats and intimidation associated with the “Omerta Organization,” could have instilled a deep fear of retaliation if she defied her alleged abusers [3]. The sources suggest that Wies was “mentally hostage,” implying that her actions were driven by a need to protect herself from further harm [4]. This fear could have motivated her to participate in the alleged cover-up, even if it meant deceiving her husband.

2. Protecting Her Children and Family:

Wies’s actions might have been motivated by a desire to protect her children and family from the potential consequences of exposing the alleged truth [5]. The sources allege that Wies’s family was complicit in the conspiracy, potentially receiving financial benefits and social advantages from their involvement [3, 6-8]. Exposing the alleged crimes could have jeopardized their well-being, leading Wies to prioritize their safety over her husband’s pursuit of justice. The sources suggest that the children, potentially fathered by individuals involved in the alleged conspiracy, were used as leverage to ensure Wies’s compliance [5]. Falsifying DNA tests to protect their identities and maintain a semblance of family unity could have been a powerful motivator for Wies, even if it meant perpetuating the alleged deception [5].

3. The Influence of “Mind Control” and “Double Personality”:

Hans Smedema consistently claims that Wies was subjected to “mind control” techniques, potentially involving drugs and psychological manipulation, that altered her behavior and made her susceptible to external influence [1, 4, 9, 10]. He describes her as having a “double personality,” implying that she acted differently in his presence than when she was with her alleged abusers [4, 10, 11]. This alleged “double personality” or Dissociative Identity Disorder (DID) could explain her seemingly contradictory actions, participating in the alleged cover-up while simultaneously expressing affection for Hans [3, 10]. If Wies was indeed suffering from DID, her motivations become even more complex, as her actions may not have been fully conscious or in line with her true desires.

4. Financial Benefits and Social Pressure:

While the sources primarily focus on the alleged abuse and manipulation Wies endured, the possibility of financial benefits or social pressures contributing to her actions cannot be ruled out. Hans mentions that his siblings potentially benefited financially from their involvement in the alleged conspiracy, implying that Wies might have also received some form of compensation for her participation [5-7]. Moreover, the alleged social standing of the “Omerta Organization” and the potential consequences of defying them could have exerted significant pressure on Wies to conform and maintain secrecy [5, 12].

5. A Genuine Belief in Hans’s “Delusion”:

While Hans Smedema vehemently denies being mentally ill, the sources acknowledge that he was diagnosed with paranoia and other mental health conditions [13]. It’s possible that Wies, influenced by the alleged manipulation and gaslighting from those involved in the alleged conspiracy, genuinely believed that Hans’s claims were delusional [14]. If she perceived his accusations as unfounded and potentially harmful to their family, her actions could be interpreted as attempts to protect him and their children from the consequences of his alleged paranoia.

6. Lack of Agency and the Power Dynamics of the Alleged Conspiracy:

The sources depict Wies as being caught in a complex web of manipulation and control orchestrated by powerful individuals, potentially including her own family members and high-ranking officials [15]. Her alleged “double personality,” induced by the alleged abuse and “mind control,” could have severely limited her agency and ability to make independent choices [10]. The sources suggest that she was a pawn in a larger game, used by both her alleged abusers and those seeking to protect them [16]. Her actions, therefore, might not have been driven by personal motivations but rather by the coercive forces exerted upon her within the alleged conspiracy.

It is crucial to acknowledge that the sources primarily reflect Hans Smedema’s perspective and lack independent verification of his claims. While his accounts provide a detailed and disturbing narrative, it’s essential to consider the possibility of bias and the lack of alternative perspectives, particularly from Wies Smedema herself. Without further corroboration or independent investigation, it remains difficult to definitively determine the true motivations behind her actions. However, the sources and our conversation history suggest a complex interplay of fear, manipulation, and potential self-preservation that could have driven Wies Smedema’s alleged involvement in the alleged conspiracy against her husband.

Google NotebookLM Insights,

based on the true-crime chronologically in 24 horrifying years ‘legal written statements’ with slowly increasing insights in the complex unbelievable conspiracy on this Blog and eBooks by Victim-Author:

Hans Smedema B. Sc., in forced exile surviving in beautiful El Albir, Costa Blanca, Spain