Last Updated 12/02/2025 published 23/12/2024 by Hans Smedema

The Ketamine Conspiracy: Hans Smedema’s Testimony

Main text

Hans Smedema details the debilitating effects of being secretly administered low doses of ketamine every morning for decades, primarily through his wife, allegedly on the orders of individuals involved in a conspiracy against him [1-9]. He attributes a range of negative consequences to this long-term drugging:

Reduced IQ and Cognitive Impairment:

• Hans claims his IQ dropped from 135 to below 100 due to the ketamine, impairing his ability to think clearly, analyze situations effectively, and make sound decisions [4, 6, 8, 10-12]. He describes himself as a “half-stupid zombie” due to the drug’s effects [4, 13]. This cognitive impairment is reflected in what he perceives as poor career decisions and his inability to effectively fight back against the alleged conspiracy [5, 6, 8, 11, 13, 14].

Docility and Submissiveness:

• Ketamine’s anesthetic and hypnotic properties allegedly made Hans docile and submissive, causing him to unquestioningly obey his wife and other figures allegedly involved in the conspiracy, such as Jan van Beek and Jaap Duijs [3, 5, 6, 10, 12, 15-19]. He describes this as “doglike” behavior [4, 5, 10]. This submissiveness prevented him from challenging or escaping his situation for decades.

Memory Loss and Amnesia:

• Hans describes experiencing memory loss and amnesia due to the ketamine, making it difficult to recall specific events and piece together the alleged conspiracy [15, 18, 20]. This amnesia further hampered his ability to build a case against his alleged abusers and defend himself.

Physical Symptoms:

• He links the ketamine to physical symptoms such as heart palpitations and hyperventilation attacks [6, 21-24]. These physical symptoms added to his overall distress and further weakened his ability to function normally.

Impact on Career and Finances:

• Hans asserts that the ketamine-induced cognitive impairment led to poor career choices and ultimately resulted in him becoming fully disabled and losing his income in 2004 [10, 11, 25-27].

Exacerbated by Other Alleged Abuse:

• Hans alleges that the ketamine made him more vulnerable to other forms of alleged abuse, such as electroshock therapy administered by Professor Onno van der Hart [10, 28-36]. He believes the drug’s effects made the alleged “brainwashing” and torture more effective in repressing his memories and controlling his behavior.

Difficulty in Seeking Help:

• Due to the ketamine’s mind-altering effects and the alleged gaslighting from those around him, Hans initially believed he was suffering from a mental illness rather than being drugged and manipulated [4, 14, 37-40]. This delayed his understanding of the situation and made it harder to seek appropriate help.

Hans emphasizes that the long-term, low-dose ketamine administration was a central element in his decades-long struggle, leaving him cognitively impaired, physically weakened, and psychologically vulnerable to manipulation [2-5, 8]. He highlights the insidious nature of the alleged drugging, emphasizing how it subtly undermined his abilities and controlled his behavior without his awareness for years.

Ketamine, Conspiracy, and Financial Ruin

Hans Smedema attributes significant financial losses to the alleged daily administration of ketamine, primarily administered by his wife, Wies, under the direction of figures allegedly involved in a conspiracy against him. He describes a cascading series of events triggered by the alleged ketamine drugging, culminating in substantial financial ruin.

Impaired Cognitive Function & Poor Decision-Making:

• Hans asserts the ketamine lowered his IQ, significantly impairing his judgment and analytical abilities. This, he argues, led to a series of bad investment decisions. He mentions investing 75,000 guilders in a gold mine (IPM) that eventually went bust, attributing his flawed investment strategy to the drug’s cognitive impact [1]. He claims he would not have engaged in such risky speculations had he been in his right mind [1]. He further states that the ketamine made him make poor decisions throughout his career, contributing to a “stupid career” and financial instability [2-6].

Loss of High-Income Position:

• Hans claims that the cumulative effects of the ketamine, combined with a later misdiagnosis and administration of an antipsychotic drug (Risperdal), led to his being declared fully disabled in January 2004. This resulted in the loss of his high-income position as an executive searcher, costing him approximately 145,000 euros annually [6-13].

Depletion of Pension Fund:

• Hans details the depletion of his 300,000 euro pension fund due to the mounting costs of investigating the alleged conspiracy and pursuing legal action [7, 8, 10, 11, 14-16]. He also mentions additional unnecessary expenses incurred as a direct consequence of decisions made under the influence of the alleged drugs, further draining his finances [7, 8].

Lost Opportunities:

• Hans cites the loss of opportunities that could have improved his financial situation, including career advancement, business deals, and a potential job in the US, as consequences of being drugged and mentally incapacitated [17, 18]. This alleged interference had a substantial impact on their financial situation, leading to debt and financial strain [19].

Financial Exploitation by Others:

• Hans describes how his impaired state, allegedly caused by the ketamine, made him vulnerable to financial exploitation by those in the alleged conspiracy. He cites an instance where his brother, Marinus, allegedly defrauded him of a significant sum of money related to the Euro-Routing business while Hans was under the influence of ketamine [20, 21]. He also claims that his wife paid Jaap Duijs’s bills and debts without his knowledge, further depleting their resources [8].

The daily ketamine doses, according to Hans, created a downward spiral, leading to poor financial decisions, loss of income, and increasing expenses related to his fight for justice and survival. This alleged long-term drugging, coupled with other alleged abuses and manipulation, forms the basis of his claim of substantial financial ruin.

Smedema’s Exile: Wife’s Alleged Role

Hans Smedema believes that his wife, Wies, handicapped him for decades, ultimately leading to his self-imposed exile in Spain. According to Hans, this was due to a combination of her alleged “double personality” or Dissociative Identity Disorder (DID), her alleged involvement in a conspiracy against him, and her refusal to acknowledge the abuse she allegedly suffered.

Wies’s Alleged Double Personality:

Hans claims that Wies developed a “double personality” as a result of alleged torture with an electric cattle prod in 1972 [1]. He believes this other personality was responsible for actions that harmed him, such as having sex with other men without remembering it, stealing evidence from him, and making false statements to the police [2]. Due to her alleged DID, she was unable to remember or acknowledge the abuse, making it impossible for her to support his claims or seek help [1]. This lack of support from his wife further isolated Hans and made his claims seem less credible to others [3].

Wies’s Alleged Involvement in the Conspiracy:

Hans alleges that Wies was actively involved in the conspiracy against him, influenced by her family and individuals like Jaap Duijs [4]. He claims that she was directed by Duijs to destroy evidence and even secretly administer drugs to him, including ketamine, which impaired his cognitive abilities and affected his decision-making [5, 6]. Her alleged participation in the conspiracy prevented Hans from trusting her and made it difficult for him to build a case against his alleged abusers [3].

Wies’s Refusal to Acknowledge the Abuse:

Hans asserts that Wies consistently denied the abuse she allegedly suffered, despite his attempts to convince her [7]. Her refusal to acknowledge the abuse contributed to their constant fighting and made it impossible for them to work together to address the situation [8]. This conflict ultimately led to their separation and Hans’s decision to flee to Spain [9].

Hans’s claims about his wife’s role in his predicament are complex and intertwined with his broader allegations of a large-scale conspiracy against him. However, based on his account, it’s clear that he believes Wies’s alleged DID, her alleged involvement in the conspiracy, and her refusal to acknowledge the abuse all contributed to his decades-long struggle and his eventual exile.

Wies Smedema: Victim or Conspirator?

Wies Smedema (Jansma)’s role within Hans Smedema’s narrative is complex and multifaceted, portrayed as both a victim of abuse and a participant in the alleged conspiracy against him. Disentangling her motivations and actions requires careful consideration of Hans’s claims of her “double personality,” the alleged manipulation she endured, and the potential consequences she faced if she defied her alleged abusers.

1. Victim of Abuse and Manipulation:

Hans consistently describes Wies as a victim of long-term abuse, starting with the alleged sexual assault and manipulation by Jan van Beek, Jaap Duijs, and potentially others [1-3]. He claims she was subjected to mind control techniques, drugging, and electroshock therapy, potentially leaving her highly vulnerable and susceptible to manipulation [4-9]. He asserts that Jaap Duijs directed her actions, turning her into a “sex slave” with a double personality, the “emotional personality,” unaware of the abuse she endured in this state [4, 8, 10-12]. This double personality allegedly allowed her to function normally in Hans’s presence while simultaneously complying with her alleged abusers’ demands [1, 5, 10, 13]. Hans’s narrative emphasizes Wies’s vulnerability, portraying her as a pawn in a larger game orchestrated by powerful individuals. Her alleged inability to remember the abuse she allegedly suffered further complicates her situation and contributes to her perceived powerlessness.

2. Participant in the Conspiracy:

Despite portraying Wies as a victim, Hans also describes instances where her actions directly contributed to his downfall. He alleges that she administered ketamine to him daily, under duress from Duijs [4, 5, 7, 14-17]. He also claims she actively worked against his interests by destroying evidence, making false statements to the police, and obstructing his efforts to uncover the truth [10, 15, 18]. These actions, even if performed under duress, placed her in the role of an active participant in the alleged conspiracy. The alleged use of her double personality further blurred the lines between victim and perpetrator, as she seemingly acted of her own free will while in her “emotional personality.” Hans recounts an incident where Wies went to the police to discredit his claims [6], illustrating how her actions, possibly under duress and without her knowledge, were used against him.

3. Motivations and Complicity:

Wies’s motivations are difficult to discern, given the claims of her altered mental state and the alleged manipulation she endured. Fear of further abuse and the desire to protect herself and her children could have been powerful motivators for her compliance [10]. The alleged control exerted by Duijs and others likely left her with little choice but to obey their commands [4, 8, 10, 11]. Her alleged inability to remember her actions in her “emotional personality” further complicates any assessment of her motivations. Was she consciously complicit, or simply a tool used by her alleged abusers? The sources don’t provide a definitive answer, leaving room for interpretation.

4. The Impact of Hans’s Allegations:

Hans’s insistence on uncovering and publicizing the alleged truth, while understandable from his perspective, placed a significant strain on their relationship [19-21]. Wies’s alleged denial and anger, possibly stemming from her alleged inability to reconcile Hans’s accusations with her own fragmented memories, created a rift between them [22, 23]. The alleged constant pressure from her family and alleged abusers to maintain the cover-up further exacerbated the situation [24-28].

Wies’s role in Hans Smedema’s narrative is undeniably tragic. She is presented as both a victim of horrific abuse and a participant in her husband’s downfall, trapped in a cycle of manipulation and control. Her alleged double personality adds a further layer of complexity, blurring the lines between conscious action and involuntary compliance. Understanding her role requires acknowledging the profound impact of the alleged abuse she endured and the difficult choices she likely faced in the face of her alleged abusers’ power.

 

Google NotebookLM Insights,

legally based on this Blog and eBooks by Victim-Author:

Hans Smedema B. Sc., in forced exile surviving in beautiful El Albir, Costa Blanca, Spain