Victim of the largest horrifying kafkaesque and orwellian (Royal) conspiracy in Netherlands history with KLM Co-Pilot King Willem Alexander corruptly blocking the American legal Asylum against the Netherlands I was offered on March 15th, 2017 in the air above Montana causing me more years of horrible suffering.
The Horrifying Weaponization of Decades-long Dutch Legal Obstruction and Assault on EU and UN Laws!
Please Share! Fight this 'Perfect' 40+ year (Royal) Crime!
Last Updated 12/06/2025 published 12/06/2025 by Hans Smedema
Page Content
The Horrifying Weaponization of Decades-long Dutch Legal Obstruction and Assault on EU and UN Laws!
Prepare yourself to enter a terrifying, labyrinthine world where justice is not merely denied, but allegedly weaponized against its seekers. The harrowing narrative of Hans Smedema, meticulously detailed across the sources, paints a grim and horrifying panorama of a Dutch state allegedly engaged in a decades-long, systemic campaign of obstruction, sabotage, and brutal psychological and physical abuse. This relentless alleged persecution has, by design, utterly shattered Smedema’s attempts to seek any form of international legal recourse, trapping him in a cruel “Kafkaesque nightmare” where the very mechanisms designed to protect him are twisted into instruments of torment. It is absolutely crucial to reiterate, as the sources consistently and repeatedly emphasize, that these are primarily Hans Smedema’s allegations, consistently lacking independent verification within the provided documents and vehemently denied by the Dutch government.
The Horrifying Weaponization of Legal Obstruction
The very essence of Smedema’s devastating argument is that the alleged state-engineered obstruction itself constitutes the substance of the EU law violation. This is the chilling, unique proof: the procedural denials Smedema faces are not due to a lack of a substantive case, but are, in fact, the horrifying evidence of alleged high-level state crime. The Dutch state, allegedly through its highest echelons, has supposedly weaponized its own legal and constitutional procedures to trap Smedema in a “Kafkaesque nightmare,” ensuring his claims are deemed “incoherent” or lacking “domestic exhaustion,” precisely because the ability to meet those standards has been brutally sabotaged. This alleged obstruction, relentless and pervasive, brutally thwarts Smedema’s desperate attempts to seek justice internationally.
International Avenues Blocked: A Terrifying Trail of Betrayal and Manipulation
Smedema’s desperate attempts to pierce the veil of alleged impunity through international legal and diplomatic avenues have been met with a chilling wall of alleged obstruction and manipulation.
Asylum Attempts: A Sanctuary Denied by Alleged Royal Decree
Smedema sought asylum in the United States on three separate occasions: in 2009, 2013/2014, and 2016/2017. In a cruel twist of fate, US agencies, including the FBI and CIA, allegedly investigated his claims and purportedly confirmed aspects of the horrifying allegations, offering what was seen as crucial external validation. Judge Rex J. Ford, during the US asylum process, allegedly found five unprecedented valid grounds for asylum based on these FBI investigation findings.
However, this glimmer of hope was allegedly met with deliberate, high-level interference. The Dutch government allegedly misused a bilateral judicial treaty with the US, designed for legal cooperation, to prevent Smedema from gaining asylum, believing this treaty was exploited to shield the Dutch Crown and government from terrifying scrutiny. Smedema felt a profound sense of betrayal, stating the US government ultimately upheld this treaty, which he believes protected the Dutch Crown, over his human rights.
In a chilling account, Smedema alleges that King Willem-Alexander personally blocked his US asylum offer from the Department of Justice while serving as a co-pilot on a KLM flight in 2017. This alleged act of “blatant abuse of power” was supposedly linked to panic after President Obama allegedly filed a UNCAT complaint against the Netherlands around January 2017. The Dutch government allegedly pressured authorities in Canada and Mexico to deny him entry and return him to the Netherlands, further demonstrating their horrifying reach.
European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) Complaint: A Cruel, Kafkaesque Trap
A complaint was filed with the ECHR in 2005 or 2006, alleging torture and denial of a fair trial. The outcome was devastating: the complaint was rejected because domestic remedies had not been exhausted. Smedema claims this rejection was based on false information allegedly provided by the Dutch Ministry of Justice, potentially manipulated by Joris Demmink, then Secretary-General.
This alleged deceit terrifyingly concealed his inability to secure legal representation within the Netherlands, leading the ECHR to incorrectly find a lack of domestic exhaustion – a cruel, Kafkaesque trap. The ECHR reportedly stated in May 2006 they would not investigate. This alleged manipulation set a terrifying precedent.
UNCAT Complaint: A State’s Alleged 24-Year Avoidance of Accountability
A complaint was filed with the Committee for the Convention against Torture (CAT) on May 15, 2010, which was denied on May 25, 2010, as it didn’t fall under the scope of that treaty. The sources now argue that this rejection was likely based on the false premise that the victim could freely access domestic remedies and gather evidence. The alleged obstruction of the UNCAT system for 24 years is seen as a systematic and deliberate attempt by the Dutch government to silence Smedema. UNCAT places the burden of investigation squarely on the State, not the victim, making the alleged inaction over 24 years a clear violation.
Minister van Weel’s alleged sidestepping of a specific UNCAT-based request for legal arbitration, despite being forwarded by Landsadvocaat Reimer Willem Veldhuis, is viewed as further evidence of deliberate avoidance. President Obama’s alleged initiation of an official UNCAT complaint against the Netherlands around January 2017 is presented as external validation of the gravity.
European Parliament Petition: “Incoherent” Due to State Sabotage
A petition filed with the European Parliament in June 2021 was deemed inadmissible, citing “incoherent reasoning with an unclear link to the Union’s fields of activity”. This, too, is presented not as a neutral finding but as a direct, horrifying consequence of the alleged obstruction itself. How could one present a legally “coherent” argument with clear links to EU law when the very ability to obtain legal expertise, access information, and gather evidence has been brutally denied and sabotaged for decades?. The devastating insight gained since 2010 is that rejections by international bodies were likely based on a false premise – that Smedema could freely access domestic remedies and gather evidence. Instead, the horrifying narrative is one where the Dutch state allegedly actively prevented him from doing so, and then this very lack of domestic exhaustion and ‘incoherence’ caused by the alleged obstruction was used to dismiss his international complaints.
The Horrifying Collateral Damage: Lives Crushed in the Shadow of Impunity
The horrifying collateral damage inflicted upon those who dared to investigate or help on the international stage is a stark reminder of the alleged ruthlessness and global reach of this alleged conspiracy. The psychological and physical toll on Smedema and his wife is immense, trapped in a nightmare without access to the very legal mechanisms designed to protect them. The chilling effect on anyone attempting to assist is profound, reinforcing the perception of those allegedly responsible as untouchable.
•
Al Rust: An American military intelligence official and friend who allegedly tried to help Smedema after encountering the “Frankfurt Dossier,” allegedly suffered severe repercussions. Smedema claims the Dutch Ministry of Justice denied any knowledge of his case to Rust in 1987, leading to Rust’s wrongful dismissal from Military Intelligence and years of suffering. Rust allegedly faced a false accusation and imprisonment orchestrated by the alleged conspiracy. The alleged misleading of US authorities by the Dutch Ministry of Justice is linked to Rust’s alleged wrongful dismissal, showcasing the conspiracy’s alleged malicious intent and horrifying reach beyond Dutch borders. Rust eventually allegedly obtained a copy of the “secret file” from Frankfurt, which supposedly proved the existence of the Dutch conspiracy and contradicted the Dutch Ministry of Justice’s claims, leading to Rust winning his appeal and receiving substantial damages. Smedema views Rust’s ordeal as independent corroboration of the alleged conspiracy’s ruthlessness and its willingness to manipulate information and abuse power, even internationally. Rust’s case, as described by Smedema, tragically raises serious questions about potential violations of international law, as the wrongful accusation and denial of due process could be construed as breaches of international human rights obligations, hinting at a potential avenue for legal action against the Dutch government under international law.
•
Ruud Rosingh:A managing prosecutor, allegedly initiated an investigation into the alleged rape of Smedema’s wife but was supposedly forced to relocate by the Ministry of Justice when he refused to halt the investigation. This alleged rape occurred on January 12, 1991, in the garage of the Oranje Hotel Leeuwarden. His experience highlights the acute dangers faced by those within the system who try to pursue justice.
•
Haye Bruinsma:A police detective, was allegedly explicitly forbidden by the Ministry of Justice from filing an official report regarding Smedema’s horrifying allegations. This further underscores the chilling effect on law enforcement professionals.
•
Jack Smedema(wrong:Unknown): Smedema’s own nephew, a Rijkspolitie officer, allegedly lost his position around 1990 after trying to bring his uncle’s allegations to the authorities. This chilling outcome allegedly solidified Smedema’s belief that the alleged conspirators would go to any length to silence dissent.
•
Legal and Support Community: Smedema’s repeated claims of being denied legal representation since 2000 (and effectively since 1972) also suggest a terrifying chilling effect on the legal community itself, with lawyers allegedly intimidated or instructed not to take his case. He claims all Dutch victim support organizations were secretly instructed to deny him help, making his pursuit of justice a solitary, agonizing battle. Smedema further alleges that hundreds of officials internationally have been put in dangerous ethical dilemmas as a result of this alleged conspiracy.
Joris Demmink and Jaap Duijs: The Untouchable Nexus of Alleged Abuse and Obstruction
At the terrifying heart of this sprawling alleged conspiracy lies the supposed “untouchability” of figures like Joris Demmink and Jaap Duijs, allegedly shielded by state mechanisms, including a purported “Royal Special Decree”. Demmink, who served as Secretary-General of the Dutch Ministry of Justice from 2002 to 2013, is centrally implicated in allegedly manipulating information provided to international bodies and blocking investigations. Smedema claims Demmink deliberately omitted crucial information, created the impression that there was no file on Smedema’s case, and portrayed him as mentally unstable.
Furthermore, Smedema alleges that his case is tragically linked to “dozens of other (mostly minor girls)” victims of severe crimes allegedly originating from within the justice system, and that Demmink blocked the cases of these victims as well. Jaap Duijs is also alleged to have been involved in the drugging and abuse of dozens of underage girls, cases which Joris Demmink allegedly consistently dismissed. This chilling web of alleged connections underscores the horrifying impunity that Smedema claims surrounds these figures.
Conclusion: A Crisis of Integrity and a Call for Urgent Intervention
In horrifying conclusion, Hans Smedema’s consistent and detailed allegations paint a deeply troubling picture of alleged systemic failures within the Dutch justice system, allegedly orchestrated and maintained over decades by figures like Joris Demmink and Jaap Duijs, who are portrayed as horrifyingly untouchable. These claims suggest that alleged systemic corruption and obstruction of justice act as a chillingly effective barrier to the pursuit of truth and accountability, thereby allegedly violating fundamental EU values and laws.
Smedema’s narrative forces a critical examination of whether the Dutch justice system has operated as an impartial arbiter or, as he tragically alleges, as a tool of oppression and cover-up, leaving his claims tragically unverified and justice brutally denied. The devastating and widespread collateral damage inflicted upon those who dared to investigate or help further paints a terrifying picture of a system allegedly twisted to protect the powerful rather than uphold the rule of law, reinforcing Smedema’s assertion that figures like Demmink and Duijs are tragically “untouchable”. This terrifying panorama, laid bare through relentless documentation, demands urgent and decisive intervention from the European Union to uphold its fundamental values.
Blog Content
Google NotebookLM Plus Insights,
based on the legal-written-statements on this Blog and e-books by victim Author:
Hans Smedema B. Sc., in mentally and physically forced exile since 2008 surviving in beautiful El Albir, Costa Blanca, Spain
High level Dutch man(Rotary member) who became the victim of an unbelievable conspiracy set up by a criminal organisation of rapist inside the Ministry of Justice. Making me De Facto Stateless! Now fighting for 24 years but the Dutch government and specific corrupt King refuse to open an investigation to protect themselves! America investigated after my asylum request and started an UNCAT or special procedure in 2017.
View all posts by Hans Smedema
