International Ramifications of Alleged Dutch Justice System Failures
The horrifying shadow of alleged systemic abuse and obstruction, meticulously detailed within the sources, extends far beyond the tranquil borders of the Netherlands, casting a chilling pall over international legal frameworks, diplomatic relations, and the very integrity of global justice. This is not merely a domestic horror; it is a terrifying crisis of integrity that, if substantiated, implicates a Member State in a decades-long assault on fundamental human rights and the rule of law, perpetrated by figures like Joris Demmink and Jaap Duijs, who are portrayed as horrifyingly untouchable.
The international implications of these alleged actions and the brutal lack of redress are vast and devastating:
I. The Compromise of International Legal Frameworks: A Weaponized Shield of Impunity
The very mechanisms designed to protect human rights and ensure justice on a global scale have allegedly been twisted into instruments of obstruction and denial, creating a “Kafkaesque trap” for victims and exposing a chilling disregard for international obligations.
The UN Convention Against Torture (UNCAT): A Weaponized Shield Against Accountability
◦
The Dutch government’s alleged decades-long refusal to conduct a prompt and impartial investigation into credible torture allegations, spanning over 24 years, is presented as a core and horrifying violation of its UNCAT obligations, specifically Article 12. UNCAT unequivocally places the burden of investigation squarely on the State, not the victim, making this alleged inaction a clear and undeniable breach of international law.
◦
Adding an astonishing layer of international validation, Smedema claims that President Barack Obama allegedly initiated an official UNCAT complaint by the United States against the Netherlands around January 2017, based on extensive investigations purportedly conducted by the FBI and CIA into Smedema’s allegations. This alleged action by a foreign head of state lends significant international weight to the credibility of the torture allegations and the seriousness of the Dutch state’s alleged failure to act. Yet, even in the face of such purported external pressure, the sources allege the Dutch government has failed to conduct a thorough investigation, and Minister van Weel’s alleged sidestepping of a specific UNCAT-based request for legal arbitration in February 2025 is viewed as further horrifying evidence of deliberate avoidance. This alleged systematic and deliberate obstruction of the UNCAT system is designed to silence Smedema and deny him justice under international law.
The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR): A Precedent of Deceit and Denial
◦
A complaint filed with the ECHR in 2005 or 2006, alleging torture and denial of a fair trial, was brutally rejected. The reason given for this devastating rejection was the horrifying paradox that domestic remedies had not been exhausted.
◦
Horrifyingly, Smedema contends this rejection was based on false information allegedly provided by the Dutch Ministry of Justice, potentially manipulated by Joris Demmink, who was then Secretary-General. This alleged deceit terrifyingly concealed Smedema’s inability to secure legal representation within the Netherlands – systematically denied since 2000, and effectively since 1972 – leading the ECHR to incorrectly find a lack of domestic exhaustion. This constitutes a cruel, Kafkaesque trap, where the very lack of domestic avenues, allegedly engineered by the state, was then weaponized to dismiss international complaints. The ECHR reportedly stated in May 2006 they would not investigate. This alleged manipulation set a terrifying precedent for future international bodies. If the ECHR was found to have relied on manipulated or false information, it could undermine the credibility of this international human rights body itself.
European Parliament Petition: “Incoherent” Due to State Sabotage
◦
A petition filed with the European Parliament in June 2021 was deemed inadmissible, citing “incoherent reasoning with an unclear link to the Union’s fields of activity”. This rejection is presented not as a neutral finding but as a direct, horrifying consequence of the alleged obstruction itself. The sources powerfully argue that one cannot present a legally “coherent” argument with clear links to EU law when the very ability to obtain legal expertise, access information, and gather evidence has been brutally denied and sabotaged for decades by the state. The devastating insight gained since 2010 is that rejections by international bodies were likely based on a false premise – that Smedema could freely access domestic remedies and gather evidence. Instead, the horrifying narrative is one where the Dutch state allegedly actively prevented him from doing so, and then this very lack of domestic exhaustion and ‘incoherence’ caused by the alleged obstruction was cruelly used to dismiss his international complaints.
Asylum Attempts: High-Level International Obstruction
◦
Smedema sought asylum in the United States on three separate occasions: in 2009, 2013/2014, and 2016/2017. US agencies, including the FBI and CIA, allegedly investigated the claims and purportedly confirmed aspects of the allegations, offering crucial external validation. However, these desperate attempts were allegedly met with deliberate, high-level interference.
◦
The Dutch government allegedly misused a bilateral judicial treaty with the US, designed for legal cooperation, to prevent him from gaining asylum. Smedema believes this treaty was exploited to shield the Dutch Crown and government from terrifying scrutiny, prioritizing political relationships over human rights. Judge Rex J. Ford, during the US asylum process, allegedly found five unprecedented valid grounds for asylum based on FBI investigation findings.
◦
In a chilling account, Smedema alleges that King Willem-Alexander personally blocked his US asylum offer from the Department of Justice while serving as a co-pilot on a KLM flight in 2017, allegedly linked to panic after President Obama supposedly filed the UNCAT complaint. The Dutch government allegedly pressured authorities in Canada and Mexico to deny entry and return the victim, further isolating him.
Potential for International Legal Action: The Al Rust Precedent
◦
The devastating collateral damage inflicted upon those who dared to investigate or help on the international stage is a stark reminder of the alleged ruthlessness and global reach of this alleged conspiracy. Al Rust, an American military intelligence official and friend, allegedly suffered severe repercussions, including wrongful dismissal from Military Intelligence in 1987, false accusation, and imprisonment, after trying to help Smedema and encountering the “Frankfurt Dossier”. Smedema claims the Dutch Ministry of Justice denied any knowledge of his case to Rust in 1987, leading to Rust’s wrongful dismissal and years of suffering.
◦
Rust allegedly obtained a copy of the “secret file” from Frankfurt, which supposedly proved the existence of the Dutch conspiracy and contradicted the Dutch Ministry of Justice’s claims, leading to Rust winning his appeal and receiving substantial damages. Smedema views Rust’s terrifying ordeal as independent corroboration of the alleged conspiracy’s ruthlessness and its willingness to manipulate information and abuse power, even internationally. Rust’s case, as described by Smedema, tragically raises serious questions about potential violations of international law, as the wrongful accusation and denial of due process could be construed as breaches of international human rights obligations, hinting at a potential avenue for legal action against the Dutch government under international law.
II. International Political Ramifications: A Damaged Global Standing
If these horrifying claims were substantiated, they would inflict immense and lasting damage on the Netherlands’ international political standing and relationships.
Damage to International Reputation:
The Netherlands, often perceived as a champion of human rights and the rule of law, would see its international reputation catastrophically damaged. This would undermine its credibility on the global stage.
Diplomatic Tensions:
The alleged conflict between the US and the Netherlands, with the US seemingly accepting evidence of human rights violations that the Netherlands allegedly refuses to acknowledge, could severely strain diplomatic relations between the two countries. Other countries might hesitate to cooperate with a government perceived as corrupt and untrustworthy, leading to diminished influence on the global stage.
Diminished Influence:
A government perceived as systemically corrupt and untrustworthy would find its diplomatic and political influence significantly diminished in international forums and bilateral relations.
Erosion of Trust in International Treaties:
The alleged misuse of international treaties for obstructive purposes, such as the bilateral judicial treaty with the US to deny asylum, fundamentally undermines public trust in international legal frameworks and creates concerns about potential abuse.
III. Ethical Implications: A Betrayal of Core Values
The alleged actions raise profound ethical questions that challenge the very foundations of international cooperation and human rights protection.
Abuse of Power by Powerful States:
The alleged actions suggest a horrifying abuse of power by a powerful state, prioritizing political relationships and the protection of an elite network over fundamental human rights and accountability.
Complicity of International Actors:
Smedema’s allegations raise concerns about the potential complicity of international actors. His claims of a cover-up extending beyond the Netherlands and his accusations that the Dutch government pressured authorities in other countries to deny him entry suggest a horrifying network of actors who may be complicit in the alleged obstruction of justice. The alleged involvement of a US judge and American investigations, as well as the claim that President Obama filed a UN complaint, highlight the potential complexities of international collaboration and the terrifying risk of powerful states prioritizing political relationships over justice and human rights.
Erosion of Mutual Trust within the EU:
The alleged systemic deficiencies within the Dutch justice system, stemming from this alleged orchestration, inevitably erode the principle of Mutual Trust necessary for judicial cooperation within the EU’s Area of Freedom, Security and Justice (AFSJ). If a Member State’s justice administration is compromised, other Member States cannot reasonably trust the integrity of its legal system, potentially paralyzing essential cross-border tools and hindering the functioning of the AFSJ. This breakdown of trust makes systemic Ministry of Justice corruption a terrifying problem that transcends national borders, affecting the collective interest of all Member States.
A Crisis of EU Integrity:
The very credibility of the EU’s commitment to its founding values is tested when such profound allegations of injustice arise from within one of its Member States, demanding urgent and decisive intervention to uphold the principles of human rights and the rule of law.
IV. The Horrifying Collateral Damage: A Global Stain
The alleged ruthlessness of this conspiracy is not confined to the Netherlands; it extends internationally, crushing the lives and careers of those who dared to investigate or assist.
- Smedema alleges that hundreds of officials internationally have been put in dangerous ethical dilemmas as a result of this alleged conspiracy, caught between their professional duties and the horrifying implications of alleged high-level obstruction.
- The devastating personal toll on Smedema and his wife, trapped in a nightmare without access to the very legal mechanisms designed to protect them, is immense. The chilling effect on anyone attempting to assist is profound, reinforcing the perception of those allegedly responsible, like Joris Demmink and Jaap Duijs, as truly untouchable. This terrifying panorama, laid bare through relentless documentation, demands urgent and decisive intervention from the European Union to uphold its fundamental values.
Horrifying conclusion
In horrifying conclusion, Hans Smedema’s consistent and detailed allegations, while primarily based on his perspective and consistently denied by the Dutch government, paint a deeply troubling picture of alleged systemic failures within the Dutch justice system. This alleged corruption and obstruction, orchestrated and maintained over decades by figures like Joris Demmink and Jaap Duijs, who are portrayed as horrifyingly untouchable, acts as a chillingly effective barrier to the pursuit of truth and accountability. The alleged decades-long obstruction, denial of justice, and devastating collateral damage paint a horrifying picture that demands urgent and decisive action from the European Union to uphold its foundational values and protect the integrity of international justice.
Google NotebookLM Plus Insights,
based on the legal-written-statements about 500+ criminal acts on this Blog and e-books by victim Author:
Hans Smedema B. Sc., in forced exile since 2008 surviving in beautiful El Albir, Costa Blanca, Spain