Smedema’s Evidence: A Blend of Personal Records, Witness Accounts, and Allegations of High-Level Interference

Smedema presents a complex web of “evidence” to support his claims of a grand conspiracy against him, meticulously documented in his blog posts. While he offers a wealth of details, dates, and names, it’s essential to remember that this information comes solely from his perspective and lacks independent verification within the sources provided.

Here’s a closer look at the key types of evidence Smedema presents:

1. Personal Records as Indicators of Manipulation and Obstruction

Smedema claims to have meticulously reviewed his medical records, court documents, and correspondence, finding what he believes to be clear signs of tampering and deliberate obstruction of justice.

• Medical Records: He alleges his medical records show he was secretly sterilized in 1972 and then made fertile again without his knowledge or consent [1, 2]. He sees this as a deliberate act to control his reproductive capabilities and a key part of the alleged conspiracy surrounding his wife and her alleged abusers [3, 4]. He also claims that medical records documenting his treatment for symptoms consistent with ketamine poisoning have been manipulated or suppressed [5].
• Court and Police Records: Smedema points to inconsistencies and missing documents in police reports and court files related to his attempts to report crimes and seek legal recourse. He claims that police reports were altered, crucial files were deleted, and evidence was ignored or suppressed [1, 6, 7]. He interprets these discrepancies as deliberate attempts to undermine his credibility and obstruct justice [6-8].

2. Witness Testimonies and the Challenge of Verification

Smedema frequently mentions gathering testimonies from various individuals who, he believes, corroborate his claims. However, the sources only offer Smedema’s interpretation of these testimonies, making it impossible to verify their content or assess the reliability of the witnesses.

• Elise Boers: Smedema cites his former girlfriend, Elise Boers, as a key witness who initially confirmed the existence of a conspiracy and provided him with information about the alleged involvement of high-ranking officials. However, he later accuses her of changing her story and denying her previous statements, attributing this to pressure and intimidation from those involved in the alleged cover-up [1, 9].
• Family Members: Smedema alleges that several family members, including his brother Johan and brother-in-law Tjitte de Jong, were either complicit in the conspiracy or manipulated into working against him. However, he does not provide any direct quotes or documented evidence to support these claims, relying instead on his interpretations of their actions and conversations [1, 10].
• Officials and Professionals: Smedema mentions obtaining information from various officials and professionals who, he believes, witnessed or were aware of elements of the alleged conspiracy. This includes individuals like Mr. W.R. (Ruud) Rosingh, a former head prosecutor, and psychologists Joseph James, Bruggeman, and Luttikhuizen. However, the sources lack any independent confirmation of their statements or their alleged involvement [11, 12].

3. Private Investigators: Limited Findings and Obstacles to Investigation

Smedema hired at least two private detective firms to investigate his claims, hoping to uncover concrete evidence to support his allegations. While he claims the investigators found inconsistencies and suspicious activities, their final reports, according to Smedema, did not provide conclusive proof of a grand conspiracy.

• K2 Detectives and Paalman and de Roy van Zuydewijn Detective Consultations: Smedema highlights the challenges these firms faced, including a lack of cooperation from Dutch authorities, a reluctance among potential witnesses to speak openly, and the alleged destruction or manipulation of key documents. He attributes these obstacles to the alleged cover-up, suggesting that those involved were actively working to obstruct any independent investigation [1, 8].

4. The “Frankfurt Dossier”: A Crucial Piece of Missing Evidence

Smedema places significant emphasis on a file he calls the “Frankfurt dossier”, which he believes contained irrefutable proof of the conspiracy against him and the involvement of the Dutch Royal Family. However, this dossier, which he alleges was held by the 97th General Army Hospital in Frankfurt in 1983, has vanished, further fueling his suspicions.

• Contents of the Dossier: Smedema claims this dossier was over 30 pages long and contained information about his wife’s alleged abuse, medical records, evidence of a cover-up orchestrated by high-ranking officials, and a secret ruling issued by Queen Juliana to protect those involved [13].
• Deletion and American Confirmation: He alleges that the AIVD erased the dossier within days of its discovery to prevent its contents from becoming public and to protect the Royal Family [13]. Smedema also links the Frankfurt dossier to the case of his American friend, Al Rust, who was investigated by American authorities and allegedly obtained a copy of this file [13].

5. American Investigations: Seeking External Validation and Facing Alleged Obstruction

Smedema views his asylum requests to the US as crucial steps in his quest for justice, believing that American authorities would be more willing to investigate his claims and provide him with the protection he couldn’t find in the Netherlands.

• FBI and CIA Investigations: He claims that the FBI and CIA conducted thorough investigations during his asylum requests, confirming many of his allegations, including the non-paternity of his children and the validity of his claims of persecution [14, 15]. He specifically highlights the involvement of Judge Rex J. Ford, who, according to Smedema, found five valid grounds for asylum in his case, a finding he presents as “unprecedented in US history” [14, 16].
• President Obama’s Alleged Intervention: Smedema goes further, claiming that President Obama ordered the Department of Justice to prepare a complaint against the Netherlands based on the findings of the FBI and CIA investigations [15, 17]. He suggests that this complaint was to be submitted to the UN Human Rights Council or as a special procedure under the UN Convention Against Torture [17].
• King Willem-Alexander’s Alleged Interference: Despite these initial signs of support from American authorities, Smedema ultimately faced repeated denials of his asylum requests. He blames this on interference from the Dutch government, culminating in the dramatic incident where he claims King Willem-Alexander, as co-pilot on a KLM flight, personally blocked his asylum offer from Judge Ford [17, 18].

Smedema sees the alleged involvement of King Willem-Alexander as the ultimate proof of the Dutch government’s complicity in the alleged conspiracy.

6. Financial Buyout Offers: Interpreting Silence as Guilt

Smedema claims that he was offered five million Euros on two separate occasions by representatives of the Dutch government in exchange for his silence about the alleged conspiracy [19, 20]. He refused these offers, believing they were a clear admission of guilt and an attempt to suppress the truth.

• Motivations for the Offers: He suggests the offers were intended to protect Joris Demmink, the former Secretary-General of the Ministry of Justice who Smedema accuses of being a key figure in the alleged conspiracy, and to maintain the “Omerta,” the secret organization he claims is responsible for the cover-up [21].

Smedema’s Interpretation of Obstacles and Silence

Smedema consistently interprets the lack of official investigations, the difficulty he faced in securing legal representation, the alleged silencing of witnesses, and his inability to access certain information as compelling evidence of an active and ongoing cover-up [8, 22, 23]. He sees a pattern of obstruction and manipulation that reinforces his belief in a powerful conspiracy working against him [24, 25].

It’s crucial to reiterate that while Smedema presents a detailed and often disturbing narrative, the sources provided do not offer any independent verification of his claims. His evidence relies heavily on his personal interpretations of events and documents, and there’s a noticeable absence of official responses or external evidence to corroborate his allegations.

Google NotebookLM Insights

Based on this Blog and Ebooks by Author-Victim:

Hans Smedema B. Sc., in forced exile surviving in beautiful ‘El Albir’, Costa Blanca, Spain