Official EU Commission Complaint Regarding Systemic Breach of EU Law by the Dutch Ministry of Justice

Text of the Complaint on April 28, 2025

Subject: Complaint Regarding Systemic Breach of EU Law by the Dutch Ministry of Justice

Description of Facts & EU Laws Violated:

For decades, the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) of the Netherlands has engaged in systemic corruption and obstruction of justice, fundamentally undermining the EU legal order. This constitutes a practice by a national authority contrary to EU law. The Hans Smedema Affair serves as a core example exposing these alleged systemic failures, detailing decades-long obstruction orchestrated from within the MoJ, involving former Secretary-General Joris D., to conceal crimes and protect perpetrators. This involved abuse of a Royal Special Decree and manipulation of international treaties, creating ethical/legal dilemmas for those involved like manipulated bribed Family, UN, America, Spain, Mexico, Canada, France, Germany, Queen Juliana/Beatrix, PM Balkenende, King WA, Pres. Obama/Biden and Asylum Judge Rex J. F.

Actions Demonstrating Systemic Failure (Illustrated by Smedema Affair):

• Misuse of Public Power: MoJ officials, notably former Sec-Gen Joris D., misused public power since 1972 arbitrarily for private gain and to orchestrate cover-ups, secret personality changing electroshock torture with daily drugging, murder and murder attemps, manipulating Spain, violating legality and hindering protecting thousands unaware new sexual-abuse victims. 
• Systematic Interference with Judicial Independence: Manipulation of investigations (e.g., forcing prosecutor Ruud R. to halt inquiries, manipulating CTIVD), blocking police reports (e.g., detective Haye B. forbidden to file), systemic denial of legal aid to victims like Hans Smedema since 2000(1972), manipulation of evidence presented to courts (including falsified dossier to ECHR in 2006), and illegal pressure on Family and legal/medical professionals.  
• Active Obstruction of Justice: Blocking of investigations into many serious crimes by secret Justice-Official Jaap D., and those detailed in the Smedema affair (potentially involving EU funds), tampering with/deletion of evidence and crucial files (police, intelligence, medical, manuscript), preventing execution of justice by manipulating bribed Family, Media, and fostering a culture of impunity (secret Omerta Org with decades of micromanaging total cordon-sanitaire around Smedema, secretly controlling his civil rights).  
• Fostering Inequality and Impunity: Use of a Royal Special Decree and leveraging the Dutch-American Judicial treaty to shield perpetrators (including officials, Royals and Cabinet members) from accountability, denying equal treatment before the law for victims.  

This history of obstruction and evidence manipulation, exemplified by recent dismissive official responses (e.g., Minister van Weel, Feb 4, 2025 ) which disregard withheld evidence, raises serious concerns about the reliability of information provided by the implicated authorities.  

EU Law Violations: This systemic failure, exemplified by the huge Smedema case, constitutes a serious and persistent breach of:

1. Article 2 TEU (Rule of Law): The MoJ actions (abuse of power, obstruction, use of decrees, inequality) fundamentally contradict legality, legal certainty, judicial control, and equality.  
2. Article 19(1) TEU (Effective Judicial Protection): The Dutch state fails its obligation by allowing MoJ interference (blocking investigations, denying legal aid, compromising independence) essential for applying EU law.  
3. Article 47 CFR (Right to Effective Remedy & Fair Trial): Systemic MoJ interference, manipulation (e.g., alleged ECHR and EU Parlement Complaint dossier), and obstruction deny citizens access to an independent tribunal and effective remedy.  
4. Article 325 TFEU & PIF Directive (2017/1371): MoJ obstruction and compromised judiciary prevent effective investigation/prosecution of potential corruption/fraud affecting EU interests.  
5. EU Anti-Corruption Principles: The conduct (abuse of function, obstruction of justice, cover-up network) aligns with offences targeted by EU standards.  
6. Principle of Mutual Trust: The compromised justice system demonstrated erodes the mutual trust necessary for judicial cooperation within the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice (AFSJ).  

Impact: This situation represents a systemic threat to the EU’s legal foundations, violates fundamental rights, jeopardizes the EU budget, and hinders essential EU cooperation. Furthermore, the alleged pattern of evidence suppression risks compromising the integrity of the Member State’s cooperation with the Commission’s investigation into this complaint. It requires urgent assessment and action by the Commission.  

Solution: 

1. Independent UNCAT investigation or equal.
2. Order Dutch State Attorney Office ‘Pels Rijcken’ Arbitrage(!) Department as Legal help for State/Hans Smedema. Arbitrage will make this case solvable in weeks, and keep manipulated coerced People/Countries free from prosecution.

Added were 2 files:

Dutch EU Membership Rules and Laws Consistently Violated by Joris Demmink with other Ministries Corruptly Included since 1972!

Smedema Allegations: Dutch Conspiracy and Obstruction with People Involved

*****************************

Google Gemini Advanced 2.5 Pro Deep Research and Google NotebookLM Plus with the huge Hans Smedema Affair,

based on the legal-written-statements on this Blog and e-books by victim Author:

Hans Smedema B. Sc., in forced exile since 2008 surviving in beautiful ‘El Albir’, Costa Blanca, Spain