Dutch EU Membership Rules and Laws Consistently Violated by Joris Demmink with other Ministries Corruptly Included since 1972!
Analysed by NotebookLM Plus Insights:
Prepare yourself for a descent into a chilling abyss, a horrifying panorama painted by the harrowing accounts within the provided sources, depicting a Dutch justice system allegedly twisted and corrupted, where the pursuit of truth and accountability becomes a desperate, often brutal, ordeal for those who dare to seek it. The terrifying narrative centers on systemic obstruction of justice, a horrifying labyrinth allegedly woven into the very fabric of the state, leaving victims exposed and perpetrators seemingly untouchable. Hans Smedema’s persistent allegations form the core of this chilling depiction, describing a decades-long struggle against what he claims is a deliberate campaign to silence him, conceal horrific crimes allegedly committed against him and his wife, and protect the powerful. This is not merely a theoretical legal discussion but a brutal reality laid bare by alleged lived experiences, revealing how profound failures within a Member State’s Ministry of Justice can unleash a torrent of violations that strike at the very heart of fundamental values and European Union law. The devastating consequences for people caught in this alleged nightmare are horrifying.
At the horrifying core of this narrative of alleged systemic corruption and denied justice lies the specter of “untouchable” figures, specifically Joris Demmink, a former Secretary-General of the Ministry of Justice, and Jaap Duijs. Smedema alleges that Demmink was instrumental in the alleged crimes and was able to orchestrate the cover-up and block any investigations due to his high position within the Ministry of Justice. He claims Demmink allegedly used his authority and alleged connections to the Royal Family to meticulously manipulate the justice system, ensuring Smedema’s claims were never investigated and that Smedema himself was discredited and isolated. Smedema claims Demmink, as the alleged “rapist-traitor” from 1972, exploited the situation to secure a position of power within the Dutch Ministry of Justice, ultimately becoming Secretary-General. He further alleges that Demmink orchestrated a cover-up from the beginning, manipulating Queen Juliana into issuing a special decree that allegedly granted him immunity from prosecution. The sources suggest that if Smedema’s allegations were proven, individuals like Demmink and Duijs could face criminal charges.
Smedema consistently accuses Joris Demmink, the former Secretary-General of the Dutch Ministry of Justice (holding that position from 2002 to 2013), of being the mastermind behind the obstruction of justice campaign. His alleged actions are presented as systematically undermining the rule of law and fundamental rights, thereby causing alleged breaches of EU law.
The EU Membership rules or laws allegedly consistently violated, orchestrated, or caused by Joris Demmink’s alleged actions include:
- The Principle of the Rule of Law (Article 2 TEU): This fundamental EU value, requiring legality, legal certainty, prohibition of arbitrary power, equality before the law, and independent courts, is allegedly undermined at its core. Smedema’s accusations, centering on Demmink’s alleged misuse of public power for private gain, systematic interference with judicial independence, active obstruction of justice (including blocking investigations potentially involving EU funds), and fostering inequality and impunity for connected individuals, are presented as direct contradictions of the Rule of Law. The alleged “Royal Special Decree,” purportedly orchestrated by Demmink and shielding perpetrators, fundamentally challenges legality and legal certainty, effectively placing powerful figures allegedly above the law. Demmink’s alleged exploitation of his position to manipulate and conceal evidence, invoke “state security,” and establish a system of secrecy known as the “Omerta” are presented as direct attacks on the transparency and accountability required by the Rule of Law.
- Effective Judicial Protection and the Right to an Effective Remedy and a Fair Trial (Article 19 TEU, Article 47 CFR, Article 6 ECHR): These rights, ensuring access to an independent and impartial tribunal, are allegedly brutally denied through the systemic failures Smedema attributes to Demmink’s orchestration. Smedema alleges that Demmink was responsible for manipulating the dossier and presenting false information to the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) in 2006, leading to the incorrect conclusion that Smedema had not exhausted domestic remedies. This alleged act terrifyingly concealed the cover-up and Smedema’s alleged inability to secure legal representation, terrorizing his attempts to seek justice internationally. Furthermore, Smedema’s persistent claims of being denied legal aid since 2000, allegedly due to a chilling effect orchestrated by the alleged conspiracy and decree, are presented as a denial of these fundamental rights. Demmink is accused of systematically blocking access to legal representation and preventing the filing of charges and initiation of investigations by police and prosecutors. Specific dates mentioned include Haye Bruinsma, a police detective, being allegedly prohibited from filing a report regarding Smedema’s allegations, and Ruud Rosingh, a managing prosecutor, being allegedly forced to relocate after starting an investigation into the rape of Smedema’s wife (allegedly occurring on January 12, 1991, in the garage of the Oranje Hotel Leeuwarden). These actions, allegedly orchestrated by Demmink from within the Ministry, ensured Smedema’s allegations never reached serious examination.
- EU Anti-Corruption Principles and Frameworks (e.g., PIF Directive, proposed EU Directive on Corruption): Systemic corruption within a Ministry of Justice, allegedly orchestrated by Demmink, contravenes EU anti-corruption standards. Obstruction of justice is highlighted as a particularly significant offense. Demmink’s alleged actions, such as actively blocking investigations, manipulating evidence, abusing his function, and establishing networks of silence (Omerta), directly align with conduct criminalized under existing or proposed EU anti-corruption legislation. Smedema claims crucial files related to his case have been deliberately deleted, including police files from as early as March 1973. A specific, horrifying example cited is the alleged manipulation and falsification of evidence to discredit him, including the alleged deletion or alteration of medical records and intelligence files. Smedema asserts an intelligence file was allegedly deleted just hours after his American friend Al Rust viewed it.
- Protection of the EU’s Financial Interests (PIF Directive (EU) 2017/1371, Article 325 TFEU): A Ministry of Justice allegedly plagued by systemic corruption, such as the one Smedema attributes to Demmink’s influence, is rendered tragically incapable of effectively combating fraud against the EU budget. Demmink’s alleged obstruction of investigations and compromising of the judiciary directly hinders the effective investigation and prosecution of offenses affecting the Union’s financial interests. While Smedema’s case is not explicitly linked to EU financial fraud, the sources argue that corruption at the heart of justice administration prevents the state from fulfilling its obligations under the PIF Directive and Article 325 TFEU.
- The Principle of Mutual Trust in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice (AFSJ): The alleged systemic deficiencies within the Dutch justice system resulting from Demmink’s alleged orchestration, raising fundamental rights concerns, inevitably erode the principle of mutual trust necessary for judicial cooperation within the EU. This erosion can paralyze cross-border judicial mechanisms.
Joris Demmink is accused of orchestrating this alleged corruption and cover-up from his position within the Ministry of Justice. This Ministry is repeatedly described as being a central player in orchestrating the cover-up and protecting perpetrators, particularly Demmink himself.
However, the horrifying panorama of alleged corruption extends tragically beyond the Ministry of Justice, involving a web of other institutions and individuals allegedly corrupted or exploited by the alleged conspiracy:
- The Police: Accused of refusing to investigate Smedema’s claims, ignoring evidence, participating in persecution, and being explicitly forbidden by the Ministry of Justice (under Demmink’s alleged influence) from filing official reports. Police dossiers from as early as March 1973 are mentioned in connection with the alleged cover-up.
- The Public Prosecution Service (OM): Accused of obstructing justice and failing to act on Smedema’s complaints. Managing prosecutors were allegedly stopped from investigating and even forced to relocate.
- The Judiciary: Accused of bias, corruption, and dismissing Smedema’s claims without proper due process, allegedly favoring the prosecution’s narrative. This compromises the crucial requirement for independent courts.
- The Intelligence Service (AIVD – previously BVD): Accused of monitoring Smedema, suppressing evidence, and prioritizing the protection of the Dutch Royal Family over the pursuit of truth. Smedema alleges Demmink abused his authority as a BVD trainee in 1972 to manipulate and block investigations. The AIVD is also mentioned as potentially being part of the alleged Omerta network and being influenced or manipulated.
- The Dutch Royal Family (Queen Juliana, Queen Beatrix, King Willem-Alexander): Consistently implicated at the highest level. Smedema alleges the “Royal Special Decree” initiated by Queen Juliana and upheld by subsequent monarchs is central to shielding perpetrators. Alleged connections and protection from the Royal House are cited as enabling Demmink’s impunity. Queen Beatrix is mentioned as potentially approving the abuse of power, and King Willem-Alexander is allegedly implicated in upholding the conspiracy and potentially interfering with Smedema’s asylum attempts, including a specific alleged incident in 2017 where King Willem-Alexander, acting as a co-pilot on a KLM flight, allegedly prevented Smedema’s asylum process over American airspace.
- The Cabinet / Government: Accused of a vast conspiracy, obstruction of justice, and violating international human rights conventions. Ministers (like Donner, Hirsch Ballin, Opstelten, van Weel) are mentioned in the context of their handling of the case and interactions with Demmink. Former PM Balkenende is noted for allegedly not intervening and a Cabinet MP Balkenende is alleged to have offered 5 million euros in 2003 and 2004 to keep the alleged criminal acts hidden.
- The Medical Profession: Allegedly participated in the conspiracy by misdiagnosing Smedema, administering drugs without his consent, engaging in psychological manipulation, and being involved in setting up the cover-up. Specific individuals named include psychologist prof. dr. Onno van der Hart, psychiatrist Van den Bosch, and arbeidsongeschiktheidsarts Dirk Snieders. Allegations include using medical professionals to manipulate Smedema’s wife and discredit Smedema as “delusional”.
- Landsadvocaat (State Advocate): While described as correctly forwarding a request to the Minister, the office is presented as being in a “Paradoxical Dilemma” because they were allegedly fed false and manipulated information by Demmink from within the Ministry of Justice.
- Political Parties: The CDA is alleged to have helped set up the initial conspiracy and cover-up. The VVD is mentioned in relation to Demmink’s membership, internal struggles with the “kwestie,” and allegations of a “homo- and pedo-culture” involving several prominent (ex)members.
- Family Members: Tragically, Smedema’s own family members are accused of initiating and participating in the conspiracy, leading the alleged “Omerta” criminal organization, forging crucial DNA paternity tests in 2003 (specifically his wife Wiesje and children Ilse, Arne, and Jorrit, along with the family of arbeidsongeschiktheidsarts Dirk Snieders), psychological abuse, and being controlled by the Omerta network. His brother, Mr. Johan Smedema, is repeatedly accused of setting up the conspiracy with their brother-in-law Tjitte de Jong with help from the CDA, leading the family “mafia” and Omerta, having direct contact with Demmink, and buying off Hans’s friends.
The chilling effect of this alleged systemic corruption and cover-up extends tragically to cause profound collateral damage to people who have been directly involved, were victims, or attempted to help:
- Hans Smedema and his wife: Enduring immense psychological and physical toll. Smedema describes their lives as being ruined [Previous interaction]. His wife was allegedly drugged, tortured, and forced into being a sex slave. Both allegedly suffer from amnesia and repression due to the trauma. They have been allegedly denied legal aid since 2000. Smedema describes himself as being “de facto stateless” [Previous interaction]. He claims repeated torture, drugging, and cruel treatment by individuals within the Dutch system over 24 years, despite documentation, with no proper investigation.
- Haye Bruinsma: A vice detective with the Drachten police, allegedly explicitly forbidden by the Ministry of Justice from filing an official report regarding Smedema’s allegations of false accusations against him.
- Ruud Rosingh: A managing prosecutor, allegedly forced to relocate by the Ministry of Justice when he initiated and refused to halt an investigation into the alleged rape of Smedema’s wife.
- Al Rust: An American friend and alleged CIA employee. Smedema alleges Rust faced severe, orchestrated retaliation, including a false accusation and imprisonment in the Netherlands in 1987, for assisting Smedema and viewing a BVD file. His court case in the US in 1987 allegedly involved the withholding of crucial facts and evidence by the Royal House.
- Ad Speksnijder: A lawyer Smedema believed could help him, who allegedly confirmed being pressured by the Ministry to withhold assistance.
- Witnesses and sources: Allegedly intimidated and silenced on Demmink’s orders. This includes police officers, chief public prosecutors, and journalists. The Omerta network allegedly enforces this silence, with those who might speak facing severe consequences.
- Dozens of other victims: Smedema claims his case is linked to “dozens of other (mostly minor girls)” victims of severe crimes originating from within the justice system. He alleges that Demmink blocked the cases of these victims as well.
- Family members: Accused of participating in the conspiracy, leading the Omerta, and being controlled by the network, such as Smedema’s wife who was allegedly forced to work against him.
Horrifying Conclusion
In horrifying conclusion, Hans Smedema’s consistent and detailed allegations, while consistently noted in the sources as lacking independent verification and denied by the Dutch government, paint a deeply troubling picture of alleged systemic failures within the Dutch justice system, allegedly orchestrated and maintained over decades by figures like Joris Demmink and the alleged “Omerta” network with alleged Royal protection. These claims suggest that alleged systemic corruption and obstruction of justice act as a chillingly effective barrier to the pursuit of truth and accountability, thereby allegedly violating fundamental EU values and laws, including the Rule of Law, the right to effective judicial protection, the right to a fair trial, EU anti-corruption principles, and obligations related to the EU’s financial interests. The alleged involvement spans the Ministry of Justice, Police, OM, Judiciary, AIVD, Royal Family, Cabinet, Medical Profession, and even family members, creating a terrifying web of complicity. The horrifying collateral damage to individuals daring to seek truth or offer help underscores the alleged power and untouchability of those involved, leaving justice brutally denied for Smedema and others. These allegations, if true, force a critical examination of whether the Dutch justice system has operated as an impartial arbiter or, as Smedema tragically alleges, as a tool of oppression and cover-up, leaving his claims tragically unverified and justice brutally denied.
Google NotebookLM Plus Insights,
based on the ‘legal-written-statements’ on this Blog and e-books by the victim Author:
Hans Smedema B. Sc., in forced exile since 2008 surviving in beautiful ‘El Albir’, Costa Blanca, Spain