Tag: Dutch constitution violations

Violations of the Dutch Constitution in the Hans Smedema Affair

Please Share! Fight this 'Perfect' 40+ year (Royal) Crime!

Violations of the Dutch Constitution in the Hans Smedema Affair

Prepare yourself to delve into a horrifying abyss, for the persistent and chilling allegations made by Hans Smedema suggest a profound and systemic assault on the very bedrock of Dutch constitutional principles. While it is absolutely paramount to state, as the sources consistently and repeatedly underscore, that this terrifying narrative is based primarily on Hans Smedema’s allegations, which consistently lack independent verification within the provided documents and are vehemently denied by the Dutch government, his claims, if true, paint a terrifying picture of a fundamental assault on the very Rule of Law.
Smedema, a man in forced exile since 2008, surviving in beautiful El Albir, Spain, relentlessly asserts that his decades-long ordeal of alleged psychological and physical abuse, entwined with a systemic cover-up, has laid bare potential, horrifying violations of the Dutch Constitution. The alleged actions, orchestrated by figures like Joris Demmink and Jaap Duijs who are chillingly portrayed as untouchable, have tragically impacted not only Smedema and his wife, Wies, but also those who dared to investigate or help.

Based on the sources, here are the possible violations of the Dutch Constitution as alleged by Hans Smedema:

1. Violation of Article 1 (Equality before the law): A Chilling Disparity 

This foundational article guarantees equal treatment for all persons in the Netherlands and prohibits discrimination. Smedema’s horrifying narrative suggests a grotesque perversion of this principle. He alleges that he has been systematically persecuted and denied basic legal rights solely for opposing the alleged high-level conspiracy, while alleged perpetrators, particularly Joris Demmink, received vast sums for their defense. Demmink, one of the key figures allegedly involved, reportedly received €150,000 for his legal defense in a related criminal case. This cruel disparity, where a victim is denied state-mandated free legal aid while a powerful accused receives lavish protection, is presented as a glaring, discriminatory act. Furthermore, the terrifying allegation of a secret “Royal Special Decree,” purportedly issued by Queen Juliana around 1972/73, which allegedly granted immunity to those involved and made the case a state secret, profoundly challenges the very notion of equality before the law. If such a decree truly exists and has been upheld by subsequent monarchs, it suggests a system where powerful figures allegedly operate above legal scrutiny, shattering the principle that all are equal.

2. Violation of Article 7 (Freedom of expression): A Silenced Cry 

This article safeguards the fundamental right to express thoughts and opinions freely, including through the press, without prior restraint. Smedema alleges that his desperate attempts to expose the horrifying truth have been met with chilling suppression. He claims that his freedom to express his views and publish his writings was unjustly restricted. The sources indicate that media outlets have allegedly been unwilling to report on his case, transforming his pleas into a terrifying, unheard scream against the alleged conspiracy. If authorities suppressed his publications or prevented him from communicating his allegations, it would constitute a direct violation of this vital freedom.

3. Violation of Article 10 (Right to privacy): An Invasian of the Soul 

This provision protects individuals’ right to privacy. Smedema’s narrative includes terrifying claims of unlawful surveillance and intrusion into his private life. He alleges unauthorized wiretapping and interception of communications, suggesting a pervasive and chilling monitoring by state agencies like the AIVD. Such alleged actions, if not justified by legitimate law enforcement purposes, represent a profound violation of his right to privacy, exposing his every move and word to those he accuses of tormenting him

4. Violation of Article 15 (Due process and fair trial): A Kafkaesque Nightmare 

This article guarantees the right to liberty and security of person, including protection against arbitrary detention and the right to a fair trial within a reasonable time. Smedema’s entire horrifying ordeal is presented as a systematic and devastating denial of these fundamental rights. His complaints to the UNCAT and ECHR, allegedly rejected based on manipulated information, are deeply unsettling examples.

The sources detail a litany of alleged abuses constituting this violation:

•
Systematic Denial of Legal Representation (Since 1972/2000): A central, tormenting theme is the alleged systematic denial of legal representation for Smedema, effectively since 1972 and concretely since 2000. Lawyers in the Netherlands, and even in Spain, were allegedly “forbidden” from taking his case, purportedly due to the alleged conspiracy and the presumed protection for figures like Demmink and Duijs. Minister David van Weel’s response on February 4, 2025, chillingly suggested Smedema “consider contacting a lawyer”, despite Smedema’s desperate, consistent pleas about this very denial, pleas even relayed via the Landsadvocaat Reimer Willem Veldhuis. This is presented as a glaring, discriminatory act perpetuating the obstruction, leaving Smedema isolated and undefended.
•
Ruthless Obstruction of Domestic Investigations and Evidence: Any attempt to use domestic legal channels was allegedly ruthlessly shut down. Police, like detective Haye Bruinsma, were purportedly forbidden by the Ministry of Justice from filing official reports around 2004. Prosecutor Ruud Rosingh was allegedly forced to relocate on January 12, 1991, by the Ministry of Justice after daring to investigate the alleged rape of Smedema’s wife. Alleged orders were given to chillingly halt rape investigations. Head of Police Peter Slot in Leeuwarden allegedly held back data in 2000. The National Ombudsman allegedly refused to investigate the case twice, in 2005 and 2008, stating they were not competent due to the alleged involvement of “The Crown”.
•
Suppression, Destruction, and Manipulation of Evidence: Critical documents are allegedly targeted. The infamous “Frankfurt Dossier,” a purported 30+ page Dutch intelligence file, was allegedly discovered at the 97th General Army Hospital in Frankfurt in 1983 and terrifyingly erased within three days of its discovery. Smedema claims DNA paternity tests were falsified by his children and the Snieders family in 2003 to make his claims appear delusional. A crucial photo showing his wife with Jaap Duijs was allegedly destroyed by Duijs himself. Smedema also alleges that 50 files related to his case were deleted by the Ministry of Justice and the AIVD.
•
Manipulation of International Bodies: The Dutch government allegedly provided false information to the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) in 2005 or 2006, leading to the brutal rejection of Smedema’s complaint for “domestic remedies not exhausted”. Horrifyingly, Smedema contends this rejection was based on false information allegedly provided by the Dutch Ministry of Justice, potentially manipulated by Joris Demmink, who was then Secretary-General. This alleged deceit terrifyingly concealed Hans Smedema’s inability to secure legal representation within the Netherlands, leading the ECHR to incorrectly find a lack of domestic exhaustion – creating a cruel, Kafkaesque trap.

5. Alleged Misuse of Article 120 of the Dutch Constitution: An Impenetrable Shield of Deceit 

While not a direct “violation” in the same vein as the others, Article 120, which prohibits judicial review of parliamentary acts, is presented as being grotesquely perverted and weaponized within Smedema’s case. Smedema alleges that the application of Article 120 in his deeply disturbing case is based on false and manipulated information allegedly provided by the Ministry of Justice since 1972. This transforms Article 120 into an “impenetrable shield for alleged criminal complicity at the highest echelons of the state” and a “grotesque perversion of a constitutional principle”. The law itself is allegedly “being actively weaponized, based on decades of deceit, to perpetuate injustice and protect perpetrators”. This alleged manipulation creates the very “Kafkaesque trap” Smedema describes, where legal avenues are allegedly blocked because they are founded on hidden or manipulated facts, leaving justice brutally denied.
The Collateral Damage: Lives Crushed by an Untouchable System The horrifying psychological and physical abuse alleged by Smedema, and the systemic obstruction, have left a devastating trail of collateral damage, demonstrating the ruthless and international reach of this alleged conspiracy and the terrifying untouchability of figures like Joris Demmink and Jaap Duijs.
•
Hans and Wies Smedema: Allegedly subjected to profound psychological and physical abuse, including torture, drugging, and “secretly forced criminal electroshock torture”. Wies allegedly endured repeated sexual assaults and forced sterilization, leading to memory loss and being manipulated into a “sex slave” with a “double personality”. Smedema himself faces financial ruin, forced exile, and has been relentlessly portrayed as delusional and mentally unstable.
•
Al Rust: This American military intelligence official, a friend of Smedema, allegedly suffered severe repercussions, including wrongful dismissal from Military Intelligence in 1987, false accusation, and imprisonment, after courageously trying to help Smedema and encountering the “Frankfurt Dossier”. His terrifying ordeal, and subsequent win of almost a million US dollars, is viewed by Smedema as independent corroboration of the alleged conspiracy’s ruthlessness. The Dutch Royal House is even alleged to have withheld crucial facts in Rust’s US court case.
•
Investigating Officials: Detective Haye Bruinsma was allegedly forbidden by the Ministry of Justice from filing official reports around 2004. Prosecutor Ruud Rosingh was allegedly forced to relocate on January 12, 1991, by the Ministry of Justice after daring to investigate the alleged rape of Smedema’s wife. Head of Police Peter Slot in Leeuwarden allegedly held back data in 2000. These individuals represent the brave few who allegedly tried to penetrate the wall of silence, only to be crushed or forced out by the immense pressure of the alleged conspiracy.
•
Legal Professionals: Lawyers in the Netherlands, and even in Spain, were allegedly “forbidden” from taking Smedema’s case, leaving him isolated and undefended against the terrifying might of the alleged state-sponsored operation.
•
International Bodies: The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) allegedly rejected Smedema’s complaint in 2005 or 2006 based on false information allegedly provided by the Dutch Ministry of Justice, potentially manipulated by Joris Demmink. This alleged manipulation set a terrifying precedent for future international bodies. Similarly, a complaint filed with the Committee for the Convention against Torture (CAT) on May 15, 2010, was denied on May 25, 2010, allegedly based on the false premise that Smedema could freely access domestic remedies. The alleged UNCAT obstruction for 24 years is viewed as a systematic and deliberate attempt by the Dutch government to silence Smedema. US asylum attempts were allegedly met with deliberate, high-level interference, with King Willem-Alexander himself allegedly blocking Smedema’s US asylum offer in 2017 while serving as a co-pilot on a KLM flight. This chilling act is presented as alleged concrete proof of Royal Family entanglement and abuse of power.

Conclusion

In horrifying conclusion, Hans Smedema’s consistent and detailed allegations, if true, paint a deeply troubling picture of a Dutch state allegedly riddled with systemic corruption and obstruction of justice, where the very principles enshrined in its Constitution are brutally violated to protect powerful, untouchable figures like Joris Demmink and Jaap Duijs. The sheer volume, consistency, and horrifying detail of these allegations, coupled with the alleged systematic refusal of any meaningful investigation, raise profoundly troubling questions about the functioning and accountability of the Dutch justice and governmental systems that, according to the sources, warrant serious examination.

 

Blog Content

Google NotebookLM Plus Insights,

based on the legal-written-statements on this Blog and e-books by victim Author:

Hans Smedema B. Sc., in forced exile since 2008 surviving in beautiful El Albir, Costa Blanca, Spain