LEGAL DISCLAIMER & WHISTLEBLOWER NOTICE

Copyrights by Hans Smedema on this whole True Crime Legal-Blog!

LEGAL DISCLAIMER & WHISTLEBLOWER NOTICE

 

1. Purpose and Public Interest

 

The content published on this website is documented for the explicit purpose of crime fighting, truth-finding, and the exposure of systemic State corruption. This website serves as a public dossier regarding the “Hans Smedema Affair,” a case involving allegations of severe human rights violations, State-facilitated cover-ups, and procedural obstruction by the Dutch Ministry of Justice.

 

2. Judicial Mandate (US Federal Court)

 

Publication of these materials is performed in accordance with the instruction of US Immigration Judge Rex J. Ford (2009). Recognizing the extreme circumstances of this case and the suppression of evidence by domestic authorities, Judge Ford instructed the Applicant to continue publishing all crucial events and evidence on his Blog to preserve the historical record and ensure the Applicant’s safety.

 

3. State of Necessity (Bewijsnood)

 

The Applicant invokes the legal principle of State of Necessity (Bewijsnood). Due to the Dutch Ministry of Justice’s proven refusal to generate official Police Reports (Proces-Verbaal) regarding these crimes, the Applicant is forced to rely on personal investigation, recovered memories, audio recordings, and foreign intelligence findings to substantiate these claims. The State is estopped from objecting to this evidence under the principle Nemo auditur propriam turpitudinem allegans (No one can be heard to invoke their own turpitude).

 

4. Public Officials and Privacy

 

Individuals named on this site—including high-ranking officials and members of the judiciary—are mentioned in their capacity as public officials or persons involved in events of significant public interest. There is no legitimate expectation of privacy regarding the procedural handling (or suppression) of criminal complaints involving the State.

 

5. Accuracy and Right of Reply

 

While the Applicant asserts that all information is presented objectively and truthfully to the best of his knowledge, some accounts rely on reconstructed timelines following severe trauma-induced amnesia. Any named individual or organization wishing to correct a factual error is invited to contact the author directly for a Right of Reply.

Complaint contents & Klacht inhoud?