LEGAL DISCLAIMER, COPYRIGHT & WHISTLEBLOWER NOTICE

1 – Copyright & Licensing: Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)

All text, documents, and media on this website are the intellectual property of Hans Smedema and are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

Attribution (BY): You must credit Hans Smedema as the source when sharing links to this dossier.
NonCommercial (NC): You may not use this material for commercial purposes without a specific written agreement.
NoDerivatives (ND) – STRICTLY ENFORCED: The creation of derivative works based on this content—specifically including documentaries, films, screenplays, books, or dramatic adaptations—is strictly prohibited without express written permission.

Reservation of Media Rights:

The exclusive rights for the production of the feature-length documentary, provisionally titled “The Smedema Case,” are reserved by the author. This documentary is legally defined as a specific form of non-monetary redress (Satisfaction and Guarantees of Non-Repetition) mandated by international human rights law.

As the Project Director, I retain full artistic, budgetary, and editorial control over this court-mandated production. Any unauthorized attempt to produce a film based on the “Hans Smedema Affair” constitutes a violation of copyright and an infringement on this legal remedy.

2 – Purpose and Public Interest

The content published on this website is documented for the explicit purpose of crime fighting, truth-finding, and the exposure of systemic State corruption. This website serves as a public dossier regarding the “Hans Smedema Affair,” a case involving allegations of severe human rights violations, State-facilitated cover-ups, and procedural obstruction by the Dutch Ministry of Justice.

3 – Judicial Mandate (US Federal Court)

Publication of these materials is performed in accordance with the instruction of US Immigration Judge Rex J. Ford (2009). Recognizing the extreme circumstances of this case and the suppression of evidence by domestic authorities, Judge Ford instructed the Applicant to continue publishing all crucial events and evidence on his Blog to preserve the historical record and ensure the Applicant’s safety.

4 – State of Necessity (Bewijsnood)

The Applicant invokes the legal principle of State of Necessity (Bewijsnood). Due to the Dutch Ministry of Justice’s proven refusal to generate official Police Reports (Proces-Verbaal) regarding these crimes, the Applicant is forced to rely on personal investigation, recovered memories, audio recordings, and foreign intelligence findings to substantiate these claims. The State is estopped from objecting to this evidence under the principle Nemo auditur propriam turpitudinem allegans (No one can be heard to invoke their own turpitude).

5 – Public Officials and Privacy

Individuals named on this site—including high-ranking officials and members of the judiciary—are mentioned in their capacity as public officials or persons involved in events of significant public interest. There is no legitimate expectation of privacy regarding the procedural handling (or suppression) of criminal complaints involving the State.

6 – Accuracy and Right of Reply

While the Applicant asserts that all information is presented objectively and truthfully to the best of his knowledge, some accounts rely on reconstructed timelines following severe trauma-induced amnesia. Any named individual or organization wishing to correct a factual error is invited to contact the author directly for a Right of Reply. [email protected]

Production Inquiries:

Qualified U.S.-based producers or partners affiliated with the International Documentary Association (IDA) may contact me directly regarding the authorized production of “The Smedema Case.” [email protected]