Last Updated 22/06/2025 published 22/06/2025 by Hans Smedema
Dutch Justice: A Crisis of State Obstruction and Impunity
Prepare yourself to delve into a chilling abyss, for the very essence of legal processes and the noble pursuit of justice have allegedly been fundamentally undermined, twisted into grotesque instruments of oppression by a pervasive, high-level obstruction campaign in the Netherlands. This is not merely a domestic horror; it is a terrifying crisis of integrity, allegedly orchestrated from the highest echelons of the Dutch state to shield individuals repeatedly described as horrifyingly “untouchable,” most notably Joris Demmink and Jaap Duijs.
The very essence of this devastating argument is that the alleged state-engineered obstruction itself constitutes the substance of the EU law violation. The procedural denials faced are not due to a lack of a substantive case, but are, in fact, the horrifying evidence of alleged high-level state crime. The Dutch state, allegedly through its highest echelons, has supposedly weaponized its own legal and constitutional procedures to trap individuals in a “Kafkaesque nightmare,” ensuring claims are deemed “incoherent” or lacking “domestic exhaustion,” precisely because the ability to meet those standards has been brutally sabotaged.
Here’s how this alleged high-level obstruction has fundamentally undermined legal processes and justice:
1. The Horrifying Denial of Legal Representation:
A Solitary, Agonizing Battle For decades, from as early as 1972 and systematically since 2000, the alleged denial of legal representation has been a central, tormenting theme. Lawyers in the Netherlands, and even in Spain, were allegedly forbidden or intimidated from taking the case, purportedly due to the stance against the alleged conspiracy and the presumed protection for those involved, including figures like Demmink and Duijs. This creates a terrifying chilling effect on the legal community itself. The cruel irony is glaring: while a victim is denied basic legal aid, Joris Demmink reportedly received €150,000 for his legal defense in a related criminal case.
The response from Minister David van Weel on February 4, 2025, cruelly suggesting “consider contacting a lawyer” despite documented pleas about this very denial (even relayed via Landsadvocaat Reimer Willem Veldhuis), is presented as a glaring, discriminatory act perpetuating the obstruction and denying an effective remedy. This alleged denial of state-mandated free legal aid for torture victims is alleged to be a violation of UNCAT Article 14.
2. Ruthless Obstruction of Domestic Investigations & Evidence: A Web of Deceit
Any attempt to use domestic legal channels has been allegedly ruthlessly shut down.
Blocking the Filing of Charges and Investigations:
Police officers, like detective Haye Bruinsma, were allegedly explicitly forbidden by the Ministry of Justice from filing official reports regarding horrifying allegations, allegedly around 2004. Prosecutor Ruud Rosingh was allegedly forced to relocate by the Ministry of Justice when he refused to halt the investigation into Wies Smedema’s alleged rape on January 12, 1991, in the garage of the Oranje Hotel Leeuwarden. Alleged orders were given to chillingly halt rape investigations entirely. Head of Police Peter Slot in Leeuwarden allegedly held back data in 2000, preventing crucial information from coming to light.
The Terrifying Erasure of Evidence:
Crucial evidence has been allegedly destroyed or manipulated. The “Frankfurt Dossier,” a purported 30+ page Dutch intelligence file, allegedly discovered in 1983 at the 97th General Army Hospital in Frankfurt, Germany, was terrifyingly erased within three days of its discovery. Chillingly, DNA paternity tests were allegedly falsified in 2003. All evidence is allegedly deleted or hidden by the state itself.
3. Manipulation of Domestic Legal Procedures: A Twisted System
The Dutch legal system itself is tragically portrayed as fundamentally corrupted and manipulated.
- A CTIVD judge allegedly confirmed in 2008 that a “scrupulous conspiracy” and Human Rights violation by the Dutch state itself occurred, but politicians allegedly refused to stop it.
- The National Ombudsman allegedly refused to investigate twice, in 2005 and 2008, stating they were not competent due to the alleged involvement of “The Crown”.
- Court proceedings allegedly saw denials of defense rights or refusal to consider context and evidence. Judge Jeroen van Bruggen, who dismissed Hans Smedema’s first court case in 2009, is labeled as corrupt.
- The application of Article 120 of the Dutch Constitution, which prohibits judicial review of parliamentary acts, is central to this perversion. The sources argue its application is based on false and manipulated information allegedly provided by the Ministry of Justice since 1972. This transforms Article 120 into an “impenetrable shield for alleged criminal complicity at the highest echelons of the state” and a “grotesque perversion of a constitutional principle”. The law itself is allegedly “being actively weaponized, based on decades of deceit, to perpetuate injustice and protect perpetrators”.
4. The Highest Echelons of Betrayal: Royal and Governmental Complicity
The alleged conspiracy reaches the highest echelons of government and the Royal Family, ensuring its terrifying resilience.
- There is the terrifying allegation of a secret “Royal Special Decree,” purportedly issued by Queen Juliana around 1972/73 and upheld by subsequent monarchs including Queen Beatrix and King Willem-Alexander, to shield perpetrators and make the case a state secret.
- Former Minister President Jan Peter Balkenende and/or Queen Beatrix (“De Kroon”) allegedly refused to end the “gruwelijke zaak” despite requests, with Balkenende allegedly offering 5 million euros in 2003 and 2004 to keep the alleged criminal acts hidden.
- Most dramatically, King Willem-Alexander is alleged to have unlawfully blocked an asylum offer in the United States in 2017 while serving as a co-pilot on a KLM flight, allegedly linked to panic after President Obama supposedly filed a UNCAT complaint against the Netherlands around January 2017.
5. Manipulation of International Bodies: Setting a Terrifying Precedent
The alleged reach of this obstruction extends terrifyingly beyond Dutch borders, brutally thwarting desperate attempts to seek justice internationally.
- The Dutch state allegedly provided false information to international courts, purportedly manipulated by Joris Demmink. The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) allegedly rejected a complaint in 2005 or 2006 based on this allegedly false information, which concealed the inability to secure legal representation. This led the ECHR to incorrectly find a lack of domestic exhaustion – a cruel, Kafkaesque paradox when access was allegedly forbidden.
- The Dutch government allegedly pressured authorities in Canada and Mexico to deny entry and return individuals, further showing the alleged conspiracy’s horrifying reach beyond Dutch borders.
6. The “Kafkaesque Trap”: Obstruction as the Crime Itself
This entire horrifying pattern creates a “Kafkaesque trap” where legal avenues are allegedly blocked because they are based on hidden or manipulated facts. One is allegedly denied an effective remedy because the very system designed to provide it is purportedly compromised. Arguments relying on procedural norms or the lack of domestic findings become grotesque when, according to the sources, the state has allegedly corrupted the very system designed to uphold these norms. The alleged criminal acts of obstruction are being used as a shield against accountability by manipulating the perception of the case at the international level.
7. Devastating Collateral Damage: Lives Shattered by Impunity
The trail of devastation left by the alleged untouchability of Demmink and Duijs and the systematic obstruction of justice is immense, affecting not only the primary victim but countless others who dared to approach this horrifying truth. This inflicts horrifying psychological and physical abuse.
Al Rust:
An American military intelligence official and CIA agent, allegedly suffered severe repercussions, including wrongful dismissal from Military Intelligence in 1987 and imprisonment orchestrated by the alleged conspiracy, for assisting and encountering the “Frankfurt Dossier”. He allegedly won his appeal and received substantial damages in 1996 after obtaining a copy of the “secret file” that proved the existence of the Dutch conspiracy. The Dutch Royal House allegedly withheld crucial facts in Rust’s US court case in 1987.
Ruud Rosingh:
As noted, this managing prosecutor was terrifyingly forced to relocate by the Ministry of Justice when he refused to halt the investigation into the alleged rape of Wies Smedema.
Haye Bruinsma:
This police detective was allegedly explicitly forbidden by the Ministry of Justice from filing an official report regarding the horrifying allegations.
Jack Smedema(Unknown):
Smedema’s own nephew, a Rijkspolitie officer, allegedly lost his position around 1990 after trying to bring his uncle’s allegations to the authorities. This chilling outcome allegedly solidified the belief that the alleged conspirators would go to any length to silence dissent.
Cees van ‘t Hoog:
A neighbor and journalist who allegedly investigated, was supposedly murdered in 1980 after getting too close to the truth. This brutal fate sends a terrifying message.
Legal and Support Community:
Lawyers were allegedly intimidated or instructed not to take the case. All Dutch victim support organizations were secretly instructed to deny help, making the pursuit of justice a solitary, agonizing battle. Hundreds of officials internationally have allegedly been put in dangerous ethical dilemmas.
Family:
Smedema claims his own children have turned against him, influenced by the alleged conspirators, including allegedly participating in falsifying DNA paternity tests in 2003. His wife, Wies, is described as an unknowing, defenseless victim of alleged rape, manipulated and needing therapy, even allegedly filing a report against Smedema due to manipulation.
Smedema’s case is tragically linked to “dozens of other (mostly minor girls)” victims of severe crimes allegedly originating from within the justice system, cases which Joris Demmink allegedly consistently dismissed.
Impact on EU Values and Rule of Law:
This horrifying landscape, where justice is allegedly manipulated and powerful individuals are allegedly shielded by impunity, transforms the noble concept of the rule of law into a chilling narrative of betrayal and systemic failure. The alleged systemic corruption and obstruction of justice act as a chillingly effective barrier to the pursuit of truth and accountability, leaving claims tragically unverified and justice brutally denied. It directly violates fundamental EU rights and values, including:
Article 2 TEU (Rule of Law):
The alleged decades-long perversion of the justice system through corruption, manipulation, abuse of power, and fostering impunity, fundamentally undermines this core EU value.
Article 19 TEU (Effective Judicial Protection and Judicial Independence):
Alleged systemic interference, blocking investigations, and the terrifying untouchability of figures like Demmink and Duijs prevent independent judicial scrutiny and effective legal protection.
Article 47 CFR (Right to an Effective Remedy and a Fair Trial) and Article 6 ECHR:
This cornerstone of justice is allegedly profoundly violated by pervasive obstruction, suppression of evidence, and systematic denial of legal representation and effective remedies.
Article 21 CFR (Non-discrimination):
The denial of legal assistance is presented as discriminatory persecution for opposing the alleged conspiracy.
EU Anti-Corruption Principles & Protection of the EU’s Financial Interests (PIF Directive, Article 325 TFEU):
A Ministry of Justice allegedly plagued by systemic corruption is tragically incapable of combating fraud against the EU budget, demonstrating a direct risk to the Union’s financial interests.
Principle of Mutual Trust:
The alleged systemic deficiencies within the Dutch justice system inevitably erode the principle of Mutual Trust necessary for judicial cooperation within the EU’s Area of Freedom, Security and Justice (AFSJ).
Terrifying Panorama
This terrifying panorama, laid bare through relentless documentation, demands urgent and decisive intervention from the European Union to uphold its fundamental values.
Google NotebookLM Plus Insights,
based on the legal-written-statements of 500+ crimes on this Blog and e-books by victim Author:
Hans Smedema B. Sc., in forced exile since 2008 surviving in beautiful El Albir, Costa Blanca, Spain