Last Updated 12/02/2025 published 10/12/2024 by Hans Smedema

Is Arne The New Leader of the Omerta Organization?

The sources depict a complex web of conspiracy theories and alleged cover-ups surrounding Hans Smedema and his family. While Smedema claims that his son Arne was involved in the Omerta organization and was aware of the alleged cover-up, there is no evidence suggesting that Arne is currently, or has ever been, the leader of this organization.

Here’s a breakdown of what the sources say about Arne’s involvement:

• Early Involvement: Arne, along with Smedema’s other two children and in-laws, allegedly falsified Smedema’s DNA paternity tests in 2003 [1]. This suggests that Arne was aware of the conspiracy from at least that point onward.
• Protecting the Omerta: Smedema claims that Arne, aware that he was not Smedema’s biological child, actively participated in deceiving Smedema to prevent the truth about the alleged conspiracy from coming out [1]. During a confrontation, Arne reportedly told Smedema, “You are not allowed to enter, it is a private meeting that you are not allowed to hear!” [2, 3], implying involvement in the Omerta’s activities.
• Dismissing Smedema’s Claims: During family discussions, Arne consistently dismissed Smedema’s claims as delusions, refusing to acknowledge the possibility of a cover-up [4, 5]. Smedema interprets this as further evidence of Arne’s commitment to the Omerta’s objectives.
• Blocking Smedema’s Investigation: Smedema believes that Arne actively worked against his investigation, citing a phone call where Arne urged Smedema’s wife to contact the police, seemingly to obstruct Smedema’s efforts [6]. This incident leads Smedema to believe that Arne was in contact with individuals involved in the cover-up.
• Distrust and Betrayal: Smedema expresses deep distrust and feelings of betrayal towards Arne, highlighting instances where Arne seemingly prioritized protecting the alleged conspirators over supporting his father [4, 7, 8].

While these points paint Arne as complicit in the alleged cover-up, none of them explicitly mention or even imply that Arne holds a leadership position within the Omerta organization. The sources primarily portray Arne as a participant and protector of the Omerta’s interests, likely motivated by a desire to protect his mother and maintain the family’s fabricated reality.

The sources focus heavily on Smedema’s claims about the origins and structure of the Omerta organization. They identify Johan Smedema, Hans’ brother, as the founder and initial leader of the organization, with Joris Demmink as a key figure and leader of the Omerta within the Ministry of Justice [9-12]. Tjitte de Jong, Smedema’s brother-in-law, is also heavily implicated in the conspiracy and is suspected of being involved from the beginning [13]. While Smedema mentions that Tjitte potentially took over leadership from Johan at some point [14], there is no mention of Arne ever assuming a leadership role.

Therefore, based solely on the information provided in the sources, it is highly unlikely that Arne is the current leader of the Omerta organization. The sources provide ample evidence of his involvement in the alleged cover-up, but they do not present any support for the notion of him leading the organization.

Related Insights about Arne

Your note does a thorough job of analyzing Arne’s potential involvement in the Omerta organization. While it rightly concludes that the evidence doesn’t point to him as a leader, the sources do offer some intriguing avenues to explore Arne’s role further and connect it to the larger themes of Smedema’s narrative:

1. Arne as Enforcer of the “Cordon Sanitaire”: Smedema repeatedly describes a “cordon sanitaire” orchestrated to isolate and control him. While he primarily identifies Johan Smedema and Jaap Duijs as architects of this “cordon,” Arne’s actions, particularly his alleged attempts to block Smedema’s investigation and pressure his wife to contact the police, could be interpreted as actively contributing to this isolation.

• Expand on Arne’s motives: Was he knowingly participating in the “cordon,” or was he a manipulated pawn, perhaps acting out of a misguided sense of loyalty to his mother or fear of the consequences of the truth being revealed?
• Connect to Smedema’s broader claims: The sources suggest that the “cordon” extended beyond legal and investigative obstruction to encompass social and familial isolation. Explore whether Arne’s alleged dismissal of Smedema’s claims and attempts to paint him as delusional fit into this broader pattern of silencing and discrediting.

2. The Falsified DNA Test and Arne’s Early Involvement: The sources highlight a falsified DNA test from 2003, implicating Arne in the conspiracy from a young age. This early involvement raises questions about the extent of his knowledge and complicity.

• Draw a parallel to Smedema’s wife: Smedema claims his wife was manipulated and exploited by the Omerta organization from a young age. Explore the possibility that Arne might have faced similar manipulation, potentially being groomed into a role within the organization or coerced into protecting its secrets.
• Connect to the Omerta’s alleged generational influence: Smedema paints a picture of the Omerta organization as a deeply entrenched entity, potentially spanning generations. Analyze whether Arne’s early involvement speaks to a larger pattern of generational influence and control exerted by the organization.

3. Smedema’s Distrust and the Theme of Betrayal: The original passage notes Smedema’s deep distrust of Arne, highlighting instances where Arne seemingly prioritized the Omerta’s interests over his father’s well-being.

• Frame this distrust within Smedema’s broader experience of betrayal: The sources depict Smedema feeling betrayed by his family, friends, legal system, and even his own country. Analyze whether the perceived betrayal by his son, especially one allegedly complicit from a young age, amplifies this sense of isolation and deepens the emotional impact of Smedema’s narrative.
• Connect to the psychological toll of the alleged conspiracy: Explore whether Smedema’s distrust of Arne reflects the psychological trauma of living under constant surveillance and manipulation. Smedema’s sources describe years of alleged drugging, brainwashing, and gaslighting, which could have eroded his trust in even those closest to him.

By incorporating these related facts and ideas, you can further enhance your analysis of Arne’s role and weave it more intricately into the broader tapestry of Smedema’s claims. This will contribute to a more nuanced understanding of the alleged conspiracy’s impact on Smedema’s life and relationships.

New Extra Information-Note by Hans Smedema

Arne deleted the 69 sex photo of Guardian Jaap Duijs who coerced my defenseless Wiesje into submission. Crucial evil deed! Also Arne asked me just before my Court session February 9, 2009 if I wanted him and/or children to be at that session.

And before that he asked why I needed a Lawyer! As if he could arrange that but needed my explanation first.

Also Arne is the only one I can think of being the automatic new legal leader without an investigation. Because he is legally still my son and I am declared delusional and secretly under Government control like the Dutch TBS System. He is also the only one who is mentally strong enough.

So I am now sure he is the current secret Omerta leader!

Also my brother Johan Smedema from Gennep, decades long my enemy secretly controlling and destroying my life, died of a brain seizure two years ago. See also… Orwellian and Kafkaesque terror by the Netherlands Government!

More related insights

The original passage highlights Smedema’s belief that his son, Arne, is the new leader of the Omerta organization, citing Arne’s actions like deleting a compromising photo and questioning Smedema’s need for a lawyer. While the sources don’t directly support Arne’s leadership, they offer insights into his involvement and Smedema’s perception:

1. Arne’s Potential Awareness of the “Cordon Sanitaire”: The sources reveal Smedema’s claims of a “cordon sanitaire” orchestrated to isolate him, with individuals like Jaap Duijs allegedly enforcing it. While Smedema primarily identifies Johan Smedema and Joris Demmink as architects of this “cordon”, Arne’s alleged attempts to discourage Smedema’s investigations and pressure his wife to contact the police, as described in the source “fighting-the-unknown-part-3-outcast.pdf,” could be interpreted as contributing to this isolation. This raises questions about Arne’s awareness of this strategy and his role, intentional or not, in perpetuating it.

• Connect to Smedema’s Distrust: Smedema’s original note expresses deep distrust of Arne. Explore whether this distrust stems from the perception that Arne, perhaps unknowingly, is playing a part in this “cordon,” further isolating Smedema from potential support and validation.

2. The Falsified DNA Test and the Omerta’s Alleged Generational Influence: The sources confirm Smedema’s claim about a falsified DNA test from 2003, implicating Arne and his siblings in the alleged conspiracy from a young age. This early involvement aligns with Smedema’s depiction of the Omerta as a deeply entrenched entity, potentially spanning generations.

• Compare Arne’s Situation to Smedema’s Wife’s: Smedema alleges that his wife was manipulated and exploited by the Omerta from a young age. Draw a parallel between their situations, exploring whether Arne might have faced similar coercion, potentially being groomed into a role within the organization or pressured to protect its secrets. This comparison could add another layer of complexity to the dynamics within Smedema’s family.

3. The “Royal Special Decree” and Impunity: Smedema repeatedly mentions a “Royal special decree” issued by Queen Juliana, granting legal immunity to perpetrators and blocking investigations. This decree, if it exists, could explain why individuals like Arne, even if complicit, might operate without fear of consequences.

• Connect to Smedema’s Feelings of Powerlessness: Explore how this alleged decree contributes to Smedema’s sense of powerlessness. The idea that even his own son might be protected by this high-level arrangement could reinforce Smedema’s belief that he is fighting an insurmountable force, deepening his feelings of despair and isolation.

Outline of Arne

I. Arne’s Alleged Involvement in the Omerta Conspiracy

A. Contributing to Smedema’s Isolation (“Cordon Sanitaire”)

1. Actions interpreted as perpetuating Smedema’s isolation (e.g., discouraging investigations, pressuring wife).

2. Arne’s potential awareness of the “cordon sanitaire” strategy.

3. Connection to Smedema’s distrust of Arne.

4. Exploring Arne’s motives: Knowing participation vs. manipulation.

B. Falsified DNA Test and Early Involvement

1. Implication in the conspiracy from a young age (2003).

2. Comparison to Smedema’s wife’s alleged manipulation and exploitation.

3. Potential grooming or coercion of Arne by the Omerta.

4. Connection to the Omerta’s alleged generational influence.

C. Protecting the Omerta and Dismissing Smedema’s Claims

1. Active participation in deceiving Smedema.

2. Dismissal of Smedema’s claims as delusions.

3. Blocking Smedema’s investigation.

II. Smedema’s Perspective and the Impact of the Alleged Conspiracy

A. Smedema’s Distrust and Betrayal

1. Distrust of Arne stemming from perceived betrayal.

2. Arne’s actions prioritizing Omerta’s interests over Smedema’s well-being.

3. Placement within Smedema’s broader experience of betrayal (family, friends, legal system).

B. Smedema’s Powerlessness

1. The “Royal Special Decree” and alleged impunity for perpetrators.

2. Contribution of the decree to Smedema’s sense of powerlessness.

3. Reinforcement of the belief in an insurmountable force.

III. Arne’s Leadership Status within the Omerta

A. Lack of Evidence for Leadership

1. No direct evidence supporting Arne’s leadership role.

2. Sources primarily portray Arne as a participant and protector of Omerta’s interests.

3. Possible motivations for protecting the Omerta (e.g., protecting his mother, maintaining family’s fabricated reality).

B. Other Key Figures in the Omerta

1. Johan Smedema (brother) as founder and initial leader.

2. Joris Demmink as a key figure and leader within the Ministry of Justice.

3. Tjitte de Jong (brother-in-law) as heavily implicated and potentially a later leader.

IV. Psychological Impact on Smedema

A. Distrust stemming from trauma

1. Years of alleged manipulation eroding trust.

2. Impact of constant surveillance and manipulation on Smedema’s psychological state.

This outline separates Arne’s alleged actions and Smedema’s interpretations/feelings about those actions, providing a clearer structure for analyzing the provided text. It also directly addresses the question of Arne’s leadership status, emphasizing the lack of evidence for such a claim.

Google NotebookLM Insights

Looking at everything only Arne can be the current secret leader of the Omerta. He will do everything to treat me like a dog, what he already did since 2000, and even before that. Always negative to me just like his mother. Secret accusations so I could not fight back. Not having a Lawyer is perfect for his mentally, “why would you need that” he said once! He was deciding that for and over me. Like I was his dog. Horrifying evil treatment, like stabbing me with a knife several times. Asking people in Spain to secretly watch me fits that mentally perfect also. Giving money to Andre Gruters so my wife had to have se with Andre to get some money fits in that scene also. More about that later.

Hans Smedema B. Sc., in forced exile surviving in beautiful El Albir, Costa Blanca, Spain