Last Updated 12/02/2025 published 02/11/2024 by Hans Smedema
Page Content
Public Release of FBI Investigation: Independent Validation?
Hans Smedema contends that if America were to make the FBI investigation into his case public, it would provide independent validation of his allegations of a Dutch conspiracy and cover-up [1-3].
Here’s why Smedema believes the FBI investigation holds such weight:
Thorough and Impartial:
- Smedema emphasizes that the FBI, unlike Dutch authorities, conducted a comprehensive and unbiased investigation into his claims. He argues that the FBI, as an external agency, was not influenced by the alleged corruption within the Dutch government and was therefore able to objectively assess the evidence [4-6].
Confirmation of Key Claims:
- Smedema states that the FBI investigation confirmed several of his key assertions, lending credence to his overall narrative:
Non-Paternity of His Children:
- The FBI investigation concluded that Smedema’s three children were not biologically his, corroborating his claim that they were fathered by rapists involved in the conspiracy [7-9].
Validity of Persecution Claims:
- The FBI acknowledged that Smedema’s claims of persecution in the Netherlands were valid, supporting his assertion that he was targeted and subjected to a campaign of harassment and abuse [5, 10].
Five Grounds for Asylum:
- Smedema repeatedly highlights Immigration Judge Rex J. Ford’s statement that the Department of Justice found five valid grounds for asylum in his case, a number unprecedented in American history. Smedema believes this finding, based on the FBI’s investigation, demonstrates the strength and credibility of his allegations [11-15].
Exposure of Dutch Obstruction:
- Smedema believes the FBI investigation uncovered evidence of the Dutch government’s efforts to obstruct justice and cover up the alleged conspiracy. He claims the FBI uncovered instances of Dutch officials lying to American authorities, manipulating evidence, and refusing to cooperate with the investigation [16-19].
Contradiction of Dutch Narrative:
- Smedema argues that the FBI’s findings directly contradict the Dutch government’s narrative that he is delusional and that his claims lack merit. He sees the FBI investigation as an objective assessment that debunks the Dutch government’s attempts to discredit him [2, 3, 20, 21].
Smedema is convinced that the FBI investigation contains crucial information and evidence that would expose the alleged conspiracy and corroborate his claims. He believes that the public release of this investigation would force the Dutch government to acknowledge the truth and hold the perpetrators accountable [2, 22]. However, he also acknowledges that America is bound by a bilateral judicial treaty with the Netherlands that could prevent the full release of this information [23-26].
Google NotebookLM Insights!
Hans Smedema B. Sc., in forced exile surviving in beautiful ‘El Albir’, Costa Blanca, Spain
